BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

2 results for “disallowance”+ Section 35(1)(iv)clear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai3,104Delhi2,980Bangalore1,304Chennai754Ahmedabad696Kolkata592Jaipur578Pune431Hyderabad368Indore293Chandigarh293Raipur264Surat211Cochin200Rajkot176Visakhapatnam163Karnataka114Cuttack114Amritsar112Nagpur112Lucknow77Guwahati57Calcutta38SC38Telangana36Jodhpur35Allahabad25Patna25Agra22Panaji20Kerala19Ranchi19Varanasi15Dehradun7Jabalpur4Punjab & Haryana4Rajasthan3Himachal Pradesh2A.K. SIKRI ROHINTON FALI NARIMAN1A.K. SIKRI N.V. RAMANA1Orissa1

Key Topics

Section 80I6Section 804Section 139(1)3Section 1392Deduction2

Pr. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, SHIMLA vs. HP HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY (HIMUDA)

Appeal is dismissed

ITA/35/2019HC Himachal Pradesh22 Dec 2023

Bench: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE MAMIDANNA SATYA RATNA SRI RAMACHANDRA RAO,HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTSNA REWAL DUA

For Appellant: Ms. Vandana Kuthiala, AdvocateFor Respondent: Mr. Vishal Mohan, Senior Advocate, with
Section 139Section 139(1)Section 143(3)Section 250Section 80Section 80ASection 80I

35 of 2019 Reserved on : 06.12.2023 Date of decision : 22.12.2023 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Pr. Commissioner of Income Tax, Shimla ..Appellant Versus M/s H.P. Housing & Urban Development Authority ..Respondent (HIMUDA), Nigam Vihar, Shimla ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Coram :- The Hon’ble Mr. Justice M.S. Ramachandra Rao, Chief Justice Ms. Justice Jyotsna Rewal Dua, Judge Whether approved for reporting ?1 Yes _____________________________________________________________ For the Appellant : Ms. Vandana Kuthiala, Advocate

H.P.STATE CIVIL SUPPLIES CORPORATION vs. ASSTT.COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX

ITA/56/2008HC Himachal Pradesh31 Dec 2024

Bench: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE TARLOK SINGH CHAUHAN,HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SATYEN VAIDYA

Section 260Section 37Section 37(1)

iv) of the Act. 34. It will also be gainful to reproduce paragraphs 39 and 40 of the Excide Industries Ltd to support our view that the liability incurred by the assessee did not qualify the requirement of Section 43-B(f) of the Act and hence were rightly disallowed by the revenue. “39. Reverting to the true effect