Search: disallowance

2 results for “disallowance”+ Section 33clear

Sorted by relevance

Key Topics

Section 80I6 Section 804 Section 139(1)3 Section 1392 Deduction2

Pr. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, SHIMLA vs. HP HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY (HIMUDA)

Appeal is dismissed

ITA/35/2019HC Himachal Pradesh22 Dec 2023

Bench: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE MAMIDANNA SATYA RATNA SRI RAMACHANDRA RAO,HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTSNA REWAL DUA

For Appellant: Ms. Vandana Kuthiala, AdvocateFor Respondent: Mr. Vishal Mohan, Senior Advocate, with

Section 139Section 139(1)Section 143(3)Section 250Section 80Section 80ASection 80I

33,74,215/-. On 31.03.2008, the assessee filed a revised return declaring income of Rs. 11,86,511/- and also claiming deduction of Rs. 2,25,43,724/- under Section 80IB(10) of the Act. 2(ii) The Assessing Officer (AO in short) in his assessment order dated 16.12.2009 under Section 143(3) of the Act declined the deduction claimed

Pr. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, SHIMLA vs. HP HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY (HIMUDA)

Pr. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, SHIMLA vs. HP HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY (HIMUDA)

H.P.STATE CIVIL SUPPLIES CORPORATION vs. ASSTT.COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX