BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

1 result for “disallowance”+ Section 32clear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai6,852Delhi6,234Bangalore2,075Chennai1,975Kolkata1,592Ahmedabad878Hyderabad686Jaipur572Pune500Indore400Chandigarh314Raipur268Surat268Rajkot250Karnataka244Amritsar189Nagpur159Cochin153Visakhapatnam138Lucknow123Cuttack91Guwahati81Agra81Allahabad64SC64Ranchi64Telangana60Panaji60Jodhpur57Calcutta54Patna53Dehradun34Kerala28Varanasi25Jabalpur7Orissa6Punjab & Haryana6Rajasthan3A.K. SIKRI ROHINTON FALI NARIMAN2ANIL R. DAVE AMITAVA ROY L. NAGESWARA RAO1J&K1Himachal Pradesh1H.L. DATTU S.A. BOBDE1ASHOK BHAN DALVEER BHANDARI1Tripura1Uttarakhand1MADAN B. LOKUR S.A. BOBDE1

H.P.STATE CIVIL SUPPLIES CORPORATION vs. ASSTT.COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX

ITA/56/2008HC Himachal Pradesh31 Dec 2024

Bench: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE TARLOK SINGH CHAUHAN,HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SATYEN VAIDYA

Section 260Section 37Section 37(1)

disallowing the deduction of Rs. 45,00,000/-, the CIT(A)recorded the following reasons:- a) As; there was no specific provision under Section 36 of the Act relating to contribution to leave encashment fund, the amount of Rs. 45,00,000/- paid into the said fund by the assessee had no statutory recognition. b) There was no ascertained liability