BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

5 results for “disallowance”+ Section 25clear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai9,440Delhi7,822Bangalore2,722Chennai2,465Kolkata2,129Ahmedabad1,144Jaipur890Hyderabad806Pune695Indore487Surat483Raipur390Chandigarh360Rajkot271Lucknow230Amritsar227Karnataka223Nagpur213Cochin202Visakhapatnam179Agra117Cuttack104SC82Guwahati76Allahabad76Panaji76Jodhpur70Telangana68Ranchi66Patna62Calcutta59Dehradun46Varanasi28Jabalpur25Kerala21Rajasthan8Himachal Pradesh5Orissa5Punjab & Haryana4A.K. SIKRI ROHINTON FALI NARIMAN2H.L. DATTU S.A. BOBDE1Andhra Pradesh1Tripura1MADAN B. LOKUR S.A. BOBDE1Bombay1Gauhati1ANIL R. DAVE AMITAVA ROY L. NAGESWARA RAO1

Key Topics

Section 8013Section 80I6Section 43D4Section 139(1)3Deduction3Addition to Income3Section 1392Section 362Section 145

Pr. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, SHIMLA vs. HP HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY (HIMUDA)

Appeal is dismissed

ITA/35/2019HC Himachal Pradesh22 Dec 2023

Bench: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE MAMIDANNA SATYA RATNA SRI RAMACHANDRA RAO,HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTSNA REWAL DUA

For Appellant: Ms. Vandana Kuthiala, AdvocateFor Respondent: Mr. Vishal Mohan, Senior Advocate, with
Section 139Section 139(1)Section 143(3)Section 250Section 80Section 80ASection 80I

25,43,724/- under Section 80IB(10) of the Act. 2(ii) The Assessing Officer (AO in short) in his assessment order dated 16.12.2009 under Section 143(3) of the Act declined the deduction claimed by the assessee under Section 80 IB(10) of the Act in its revised return. This was for the reason that the assessee

2

PR COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX vs. THE KANGRA CENTRAL COOPERATIVE BANK LTD

The appeals are dismissed

ITA/83/2018HC Himachal Pradesh07 Dec 2022

Bench: HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE SABINA,HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUSHIL KUKREJA

Section 145Section 36Section 43D

disallowed under Section 43-B which, as stated above, was inserted with effect from April 1, 1984. It is also relevant to note that the first proviso which came into force with effect from 21 April 1, 1988 was not on the statute book when the assessments were made in the case of Allied Motors (P) Limited (supra). However

PR COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX vs. THE KANGRA CENTRAL COOPERATIVE BANK LTD

The appeals are dismissed

ITA/82/2018HC Himachal Pradesh07 Dec 2022

Bench: HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE SABINA,HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUSHIL KUKREJA

Section 145Section 36Section 43D

disallowed under Section 43-B which, as stated above, was inserted with effect from April 1, 1984. It is also relevant to note that the first proviso which came into force with effect from 21 April 1, 1988 was not on the statute book when the assessments were made in the case of Allied Motors (P) Limited (supra). However

H.P.STATE CIVIL SUPPLIES CORPORATION vs. ASSTT.COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX

ITA/56/2008HC Himachal Pradesh31 Dec 2024

Bench: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE TARLOK SINGH CHAUHAN,HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SATYEN VAIDYA

Section 260Section 37Section 37(1)

disallowing the deduction of Rs. 45,00,000/-, the CIT(A)recorded the following reasons:- a) As; there was no specific provision under Section 36 of the Act relating to contribution to leave encashment fund, the amount of Rs. 45,00,000/- paid into the said fund by the assessee had no statutory recognition. b) There was no ascertained liability

M/s J C International vs. Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax , Circle Parwanoo

The appeal is allowed in the aforesaid

ITA/2/2025HC Himachal Pradesh04 Jun 2025

Bench: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE TARLOK SINGH CHAUHAN,HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUSHIL KUKREJA

Section 80

25% of profit, by taking the relevant Assessment year (i.e. A.Y. 2013-14) as the “9th Assessment year” instead of “4th Assessment year” for the existing unit set-up in the previous year relevant to A.Y. 2005- 06, thereby the Assessing Officer made disallowance of deduction under Section