BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

2 results for “disallowance”+ Section 200clear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai1,975Delhi1,781Bangalore774Chennai556Kolkata448Hyderabad272Jaipur257Ahmedabad249Indore203Raipur158Pune149Surat106Chandigarh90Rajkot74Lucknow56Allahabad54Nagpur50Karnataka45Visakhapatnam43Panaji43Cochin40Calcutta39Cuttack35Agra29Jodhpur26Amritsar25Ranchi21Telangana21SC16Patna16Dehradun13Varanasi11Guwahati8Kerala7Jabalpur5Punjab & Haryana4Rajasthan2Orissa2Himachal Pradesh2RANJAN GOGOI PRAFULLA C. PANT1A.K. SIKRI ROHINTON FALI NARIMAN1ASHOK BHAN DALVEER BHANDARI1

Key Topics

Section 809Deduction2

M/s J C International vs. Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax , Circle Parwanoo

The appeal is allowed in the aforesaid

ITA/2/2025HC Himachal Pradesh04 Jun 2025

Bench: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE TARLOK SINGH CHAUHAN,HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUSHIL KUKREJA

Section 80

200/- as aforesaid. 4. The Assessing Officer vide order dated 29.01.2016, held that the condition of substantial expansion under Section ( 2025:HHC:17886 ) 3 80-IC was applicable only for those units that existed and were operational as on 07.01.2003 (being the first date of window period specified in Section 80-IC as also the first date of incentives granted

H.P.STATE CIVIL SUPPLIES CORPORATION vs. ASSTT.COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX

ITA/56/2008HC Himachal Pradesh31 Dec 2024

Bench: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE TARLOK SINGH CHAUHAN,HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SATYEN VAIDYA

Section 260
Section 37
Section 37(1)

disallowing the deduction of Rs. 45,00,000/-, the CIT(A)recorded the following reasons:- a) As; there was no specific provision under Section 36 of the Act relating to contribution to leave encashment fund, the amount of Rs. 45,00,000/- paid into the said fund by the assessee had no statutory recognition. b) There was no ascertained liability