BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

2 results for “disallowance”+ Section 139(9)clear

Sorted by relevance

Delhi2,806Mumbai2,705Bangalore1,179Kolkata1,045Chennai974Jaipur650Pune464Hyderabad453Ahmedabad389Chandigarh309Indore237Raipur211Amritsar189Surat179Visakhapatnam154Nagpur149Cochin142Lucknow119Rajkot98Agra93Karnataka90Cuttack81Guwahati72Allahabad51Jodhpur43Calcutta42Telangana30Patna27SC26Panaji22Dehradun21Varanasi14Ranchi12Jabalpur11Kerala3Punjab & Haryana3Himachal Pradesh2Rajasthan1Tripura1Uttarakhand1Gauhati1A.K. SIKRI ROHINTON FALI NARIMAN1

Key Topics

Section 80I6Section 804Section 139(1)3Section 1392Deduction2

Pr. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, SHIMLA vs. HP HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY (HIMUDA)

Appeal is dismissed

ITA/35/2019HC Himachal Pradesh22 Dec 2023

Bench: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE MAMIDANNA SATYA RATNA SRI RAMACHANDRA RAO,HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTSNA REWAL DUA

For Appellant: Ms. Vandana Kuthiala, AdvocateFor Respondent: Mr. Vishal Mohan, Senior Advocate, with
Section 139Section 139(1)Section 143(3)Section 250Section 80Section 80ASection 80I

disallowed relying upon Section 80AC on the ground that return of income had not been filed 15 within the time limit specified under Section 139(1). The issue before the Delhi High Court pertained to order passed in the assessee’s application under Section 119(2)(6) of the Act seeking extension of time for filing of return. The ground

H.P.STATE CIVIL SUPPLIES CORPORATION vs. ASSTT.COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX

ITA/56/2008HC Himachal Pradesh31 Dec 2024

Bench: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE TARLOK SINGH CHAUHAN,HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SATYEN VAIDYA

Section 260Section 37Section 37(1)

9. The assessee further approached the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT), Chandigarh, who vide impugned order again remained unsuccessful in its challenge against disallowance of the deduction of Rs. 45,00,000/-., hence this appeal. 10. The AO vide assessment order dated 29.3.2005 had held the deduction of Rs. 45,00,000/- claimed by the assessee as inadmissible on following