BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

5 results for “disallowance”+ Section 11(1)(d)clear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai13,926Delhi8,219Chennai4,313Bangalore4,132Kolkata2,867Ahmedabad1,620Jaipur1,109Hyderabad884Pune859Indore680Surat587Chandigarh435Cochin405Raipur404Visakhapatnam365Rajkot340Nagpur311Lucknow305Karnataka238Cuttack226Amritsar156Panaji142Agra118SC111Ranchi98Allahabad86Jodhpur83Patna74Guwahati72Telangana67Calcutta58Varanasi45Dehradun40Kerala40Jabalpur29Punjab & Haryana13A.K. SIKRI ROHINTON FALI NARIMAN5Orissa5Rajasthan5Himachal Pradesh5ANIL R. DAVE AMITAVA ROY L. NAGESWARA RAO1RANJAN GOGOI PRAFULLA C. PANT1ASHOK BHAN DALVEER BHANDARI1MADAN B. LOKUR S.A. BOBDE1D.K. JAIN JAGDISH SINGH KHEHAR1H.L. DATTU S.A. BOBDE1A.K. SIKRI N.V. RAMANA1

Key Topics

Section 80I8Section 143(3)4Section 804Deduction4Section 139(1)3Exemption3Section 2602Section 1392Section 542

Pr. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, SHIMLA vs. HP HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY (HIMUDA)

Appeal is dismissed

ITA/35/2019HC Himachal Pradesh22 Dec 2023

Bench: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE MAMIDANNA SATYA RATNA SRI RAMACHANDRA RAO,HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTSNA REWAL DUA

For Appellant: Ms. Vandana Kuthiala, AdvocateFor Respondent: Mr. Vishal Mohan, Senior Advocate, with
Section 139Section 139(1)Section 143(3)Section 250Section 80Section 80ASection 80I

d) the built-up area of the shops and other commercial establishments included in the housing project does not exceed three per cent of the aggregate built- up area of the housing project or five thousand square feet, whichever is higher; (e) not more than one residential unit in the housing project is allotted to any person not being

Section 1432

H.P.STATE CIVIL SUPPLIES CORPORATION vs. ASSTT.COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX

ITA/56/2008HC Himachal Pradesh31 Dec 2024

Bench: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE TARLOK SINGH CHAUHAN,HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SATYEN VAIDYA

Section 260Section 37Section 37(1)

11. While rejecting the appeal of the assessee against the assessment year, disallowing the deduction of Rs. 45,00,000/-, the CIT(A)recorded the following reasons:- a) As; there was no specific provision under Section 36 of the Act relating to contribution to leave encashment fund, the amount of Rs. 45,00,000/- paid into the said fund

PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX vs. M/S HYCRON ELECTRONICS THROUGH ITS PROPRIETOR

ITA/12/2021HC Himachal Pradesh20 Sept 2021

Bench: Hon’Ble Mr. Justice Tarlok Singh Chauhan & Hon’Ble Mr. Justice Satyen Vaidya.

Section 143(3)Section 14ASection 154

D G M E N T 2. By way of instant appeal, the appellant seeks to assail order dated 30.09.2019, passed by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (for short ‘ITAT’), Chandigarh in ITA No. 951/Chd./2019. 2 3. Respondent herein, (for short ‘assessee’), declared Rs.11,75,41,974/- as income in the ITR filed for the A.Y. 2014-2015. Assessment

PR COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX vs. KESHAV DUTT SHREEDHAR

ITA/11/2020HC Himachal Pradesh27 Dec 2021

Bench: Hon’Ble Ms. Justice Sabina & Hon’Ble Mr. Justice Satyen Vaidya Income Tax Appeal No. 11 Of 2020 Between:- Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax, Shimla. ….Appellant (By Sh. Vinay Kuthiala, Senior Advocate With Ms. Vandana Kuthiala, Advocate)

Section 143(3)Section 260Section 54

11 OF 2020 Between:- PR. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, SHIMLA. ….APPELLANT (BY SH. VINAY KUTHIALA, SENIOR ADVOCATE WITH MS. VANDANA KUTHIALA, ADVOCATE) AND SH. KESHAV DUTT SHREEDHAR, LEGALIES, NEAR MARINA HOTEL, THE MALL SHIMLA. ..RESPONDENT (MR. VISHAL MOHAN, ADVOCATE) ________________________________________________________________________ This appeal coming on for orders this day, Hon’ble Mr. Justice Satyen Vaidya, passed the following: J U D

PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX vs. M/S SURYA TEXTECH THROUGH ITS PARTNERS

ITA/18/2021HC Himachal Pradesh05 Oct 2021

Bench: Hon’Ble Mr. Justice Tarlok Singh Chauhan & Hon’Ble Ms. Justice Jyotsna Rewal Dua Income Tax Appeal No.18 Of 2021 Between:- Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax-1, Aaykar Bhawan, Sector 17-E, Chandigarh. ..….Appellant. (By Sh. Vinay Kuthiala, Senior Advocate With Sh. Diwan Singh Negi, Advocate) & M/S Surya Textech, Vill-Rampur Jattan, P.O. Kala Amb, Nahan, Distt. Sirmour, (H.P) Through Its Partners Sh. Vikas Kansal. ......Respondent. This Appeal Coming On For Admission Before Notice This Day, Hon’Ble Mr. Justice Tarlok Singh Chauhan, Delivered The Following:- J U D G M E N T By Way Of Instant Appeal, The Appellant- Department Seeks To Assail The Order Dated 28.05.2020

Section 143Section 147Section 80I

D G M E N T By way of instant appeal, the Appellant- Department seeks to assail the order dated 28.05.2020 2 passed by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Chandigarh, (for short ‘ITAT’) in ITA No. 1222/Chd/2019. 2. The respondent-assessee-firm vide its return of income for the Assessment Year 2012-13 declared income of Rs.7,36,735/- after