3 results for “disallowance”+ Section 10(26)clear
Sorted by relevance
Bench: HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE SABINA,HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUSHIL KUKREJA
10. The decision of the High Court on the first question, having been based on the decision in State Bank of Travancore [1986] 158 ITR 102 (SC) must be held to be 19 incorrect in view of the subsequent judgment of this Court in the case of UCO Bank Vs. CIT [1999] 237 ITR 889.” 17. Learned counsel