BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

2 results for “condonation of delay”+ Section 12A(1)clear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai338Pune312Ahmedabad225Delhi223Kolkata160Jaipur159Chennai154Bangalore142Hyderabad103Surat55Indore53Lucknow51Chandigarh47Cuttack39Calcutta37Rajkot36Nagpur35Visakhapatnam33Amritsar31Cochin29Karnataka24Raipur15Jodhpur15Patna13Panaji10Allahabad7Guwahati6Agra6Jabalpur5Ranchi3Dehradun3Himachal Pradesh2Varanasi2SC2Andhra Pradesh1Telangana1A.K. SIKRI ROHINTON FALI NARIMAN1

Key Topics

Section 260A2Section 1482Section 12A2Exemption2Addition to Income2

THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (EXEMPTIONS) vs. THE TIBETIAN CHILDREN VILLAGE

Accordingly the same are dismissed alongwith pending

ITA/29/2019HC Himachal Pradesh22 Aug 2023

Bench: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE MAMIDANNA SATYA RATNA SRI RAMACHANDRA RAO,HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY MOHAN GOEL

For Appellant: Mr. Vinay Kuthiala, Senior Advocate with
Section 12ASection 148Section 260A

1. Whether on facts and in the circumstances of the case and in law, the Hon’ble ITAT is justified in treating the notice 4 under Section 148 as invalid on the ground that the notice was based only on change of opinion and there was no escapement of income? 2. Whether on facts and in the circumstances

THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (EXEMPTIONS) vs. THE TIBETIAN CHILDREN VILLAGE

Accordingly the same are dismissed alongwith pending

ITA/31/2019HC Himachal Pradesh22 Aug 2023

Bench: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE MAMIDANNA SATYA RATNA SRI RAMACHANDRA RAO,HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY MOHAN GOEL

For Appellant: Mr. Vinay Kuthiala, Senior Advocate with
Section 12ASection 148Section 260A

1. Whether on facts and in the circumstances of the case and in law, the Hon’ble ITAT is justified in treating the notice 4 under Section 148 as invalid on the ground that the notice was based only on change of opinion and there was no escapement of income? 2. Whether on facts and in the circumstances