BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

6 results for “condonation of delay”

Sorted by relevance

Chennai6,162Mumbai5,355Delhi4,820Kolkata3,420Pune2,601Bangalore2,305Ahmedabad1,653Hyderabad1,619Jaipur1,071Patna1,049Cochin772Chandigarh764Nagpur704Cuttack700Surat681Indore622Visakhapatnam504Amritsar478Lucknow462Raipur451Karnataka391Rajkot388Agra340Calcutta258Panaji253Dehradun156Guwahati143Jodhpur119Jabalpur102Ranchi96SC79Telangana77Allahabad68Varanasi44Kerala32Andhra Pradesh21Orissa14Punjab & Haryana12Rajasthan11Himachal Pradesh6A.K. SIKRI ROHINTON FALI NARIMAN2R.M. LODHA ANIL R. DAVE1A.K. SIKRI N.V. RAMANA1Uttarakhand1DIPAK MISRA R.K. AGRAWAL PRAFULLA C. PANT1VIKRAMAJIT SEN SHIVA KIRTI SINGH1Gauhati1

Key Topics

Section 80I6Section 345Section 804Section 139(1)3Section 1392Section 260A2Section 1482Section 12A2Limitation/Time-bar

PR. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX SHIMLA vs. MS SOLAN DISTRICT TRUCK OPERATORS TRANSPORT COOPERATIVE SOCIETY LTD DARLAGHAT THROUGH ITS PRESIDENT

ITA/3/2020HC Himachal Pradesh27 Aug 2020

Bench: This Court. 2. On 29Th March 2019, The State Of Hp Filed The Objections Under Section 34 Of The Arbitration & Conciliation Act, 1996 (After Now Called ‘The Arbitration Act’) Against The Award Of Ld. Arbitrator Announced On 8Th December 2018. Since The Period Of Three Months Expired On 9Th March, Hence The Objections Accompanied An Application Under Section 34 Of The Arbitration Act To Condone The Delay On The Grounds That The Objections Were Filed Within Permissible 30 Days After The Expiry Of The Statutory Period Of Three Months. 1Whether Reporters Of Local Papers May Be Allowed To See The Judgment?

For Appellant: Mr. B.C. Negi, Senior Advocate with Mr. Parvesh Negi
Section 34

condoning the delay reveals that filing was seven days beyond the stipulated period, and the application also sought condonation of delay

SHIVA EDUCATIONAL SOCIETY vs. PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX

Accordingly, the ITA is allowed

2
Exemption2
Addition to Income2
ITA/2/2023
HC Himachal Pradesh
31 Oct 2023

Bench: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE MAMIDANNA SATYA RATNA SRI RAMACHANDRA RAO,HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTSNA REWAL DUA

For Appellant: Mr. Vishal Mohan, Senior Advocate withFor Respondent: Mr.Vinay Kuthalia, Senior Advocate with
Section 254(2)

condonation of delay, if the delay exceeded period of six months from the end of the month in which the order

Pr. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, SHIMLA vs. HP HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY (HIMUDA)

Appeal is dismissed

ITA/35/2019HC Himachal Pradesh22 Dec 2023

Bench: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE MAMIDANNA SATYA RATNA SRI RAMACHANDRA RAO,HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTSNA REWAL DUA

For Appellant: Ms. Vandana Kuthiala, AdvocateFor Respondent: Mr. Vishal Mohan, Senior Advocate, with
Section 139Section 139(1)Section 143(3)Section 250Section 80Section 80ASection 80I

delay in audit. The Court considered the case for condonation of delay as under :- “9. The main issue raised by the assessee

RT Vision Technologies Pvt LTd vs. The Principal Commissioner of Income Tax, Chandigarh

Appeal is disposed of

ITA/1/2025HC Himachal Pradesh28 May 2025

Bench: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE TARLOK SINGH CHAUHAN,HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUSHIL KUKREJA

For Appellant: Mr. Vishal Mohan, Senior AdvocateFor Respondent: Mr. Neeraj Sharma and Mr. Ishaan

condone the delay in filing the appeal and set- aside the orders dated 29.11.2024 and 10.01.2025 (Annexure-A6 Colly.) passed

THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (EXEMPTIONS) vs. THE TIBETIAN CHILDREN VILLAGE

Accordingly the same are dismissed alongwith pending

ITA/29/2019HC Himachal Pradesh22 Aug 2023

Bench: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE MAMIDANNA SATYA RATNA SRI RAMACHANDRA RAO,HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY MOHAN GOEL

For Appellant: Mr. Vinay Kuthiala, Senior Advocate with
Section 12ASection 148Section 260A

condoning the delay, if any, in filing the same, and after making of suitable amendments in the grounds of appeals

THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (EXEMPTIONS) vs. THE TIBETIAN CHILDREN VILLAGE

Accordingly the same are dismissed alongwith pending

ITA/31/2019HC Himachal Pradesh22 Aug 2023

Bench: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE MAMIDANNA SATYA RATNA SRI RAMACHANDRA RAO,HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY MOHAN GOEL

For Appellant: Mr. Vinay Kuthiala, Senior Advocate with
Section 12ASection 148Section 260A

condoning the delay, if any, in filing the same, and after making of suitable amendments in the grounds of appeals