BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

2 results for “capital gains”+ Section 5clear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai8,308Delhi6,214Chennai2,557Bangalore2,552Kolkata1,945Ahmedabad1,151Jaipur800Hyderabad761Pune678Karnataka495Indore435Chandigarh368Surat295Cochin243Nagpur212Raipur190Rajkot175Visakhapatnam173Lucknow155Calcutta112Telangana107Amritsar100SC100Patna92Cuttack88Panaji74Dehradun73Agra72Guwahati61Jodhpur55Ranchi52Jabalpur43Allahabad24Kerala23Varanasi11Rajasthan11Punjab & Haryana10Orissa9A.K. SIKRI ROHINTON FALI NARIMAN2Himachal Pradesh2Gauhati2Andhra Pradesh2ANIL R. DAVE SHIVA KIRTI SINGH1ASHOK BHAN DALVEER BHANDARI1MADAN B. LOKUR S.A. BOBDE1A.K. SIKRI N.V. RAMANA1K.S. RADHAKRISHNAN A.K. SIKRI1D.K. JAIN JAGDISH SINGH KHEHAR1

Key Topics

Section 1544Section 143(3)4Section 542Capital Gains2Long Term Capital Gains2

PR COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX vs. KESHAV DUTT SHREEDHAR

ITA/11/2020HC Himachal Pradesh27 Dec 2021

Bench: Hon’Ble Ms. Justice Sabina & Hon’Ble Mr. Justice Satyen Vaidya Income Tax Appeal No. 11 Of 2020 Between:- Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax, Shimla. ….Appellant (By Sh. Vinay Kuthiala, Senior Advocate With Ms. Vandana Kuthiala, Advocate)

Section 143(3)Section 260Section 54

Section 143(3)/147 of the Act was completed on 26.11.2014. The exemption claimed by the respondent was disallowed and total income was assessed at Rs.2,05,36,949/-. The Assessing Officer held that the assessee had neither invested sale proceeds of the asset in new residential house nor he had deposited the capital gains to the capital gain account

PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX vs. M/S H.P. AGRO INDUSTRIAL CORPORATION LTD THROUGH ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR

In the result, the appeal filed by the Revenue

ITA/6/2020
HC Himachal Pradesh
17 Nov 2022

Bench: HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE SABINA,HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUSHIL KUKREJA

For Appellant: Ms. Vandana Kuthiala, AdvocateFor Respondent: Mr. Vishal Mohan, Advocate
Section 143(3)Section 154

Capital Gains of Rs.12710334 has been set off against the b/f depreciation. The appellant has however wrongly computed the c/f of unabsorbed losses and unabsorbed depreciation in Sch CFL and UD by reducing this amount in Sch CFL from the brought forward losses as against the correct sch UD pertaining to carry forward of unabsorbed depreciation. Copy is annexed with