BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

2 results for “TDS”+ Section 3(1)(b)clear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai4,289Delhi4,204Bangalore2,356Chennai1,559Kolkata1,247Pune728Hyderabad628Ahmedabad546Karnataka452Jaipur390Chandigarh317Raipur291Cochin187Indore175Lucknow147Surat127Rajkot105Visakhapatnam104Nagpur94Cuttack76Dehradun76Amritsar59Jodhpur56Patna47Telangana47Jabalpur45Guwahati43Agra40Ranchi37Allahabad36Panaji27SC21Varanasi17Kerala16Calcutta10Rajasthan5Punjab & Haryana4J&K4Orissa3Himachal Pradesh2Uttarakhand2A.K. SIKRI ROHINTON FALI NARIMAN1

Key Topics

Section 2447Section 1432Section 1542TDS2

PR. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX SHIMLA vs. M/S AMBUJA DARLA KASHLOG MANGOO

ITA/23/2019HC Himachal Pradesh25 Nov 2019

Bench: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE L. NARAYANA SWAMY,HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTSNA REWAL DUA

Section 143Section 154Section 244Section 244A(2)

TDS of Rs. 45,73,528 and tax paid after original assessment of Rs. 1,71,00,320. The Department contends that the works “any amount” will not include the interest which accrued to the respondent for not refunding Rs. 45,73,528 for 57 months. We see no merit in this argument. The interest component will partake the character

PR. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, SHIMLA vs. MS SOLAN DISTRICT TRUCK OPERATORS TRANSPORT CO OPERATIVE SOCIETY LTD DARLAGHAT THROUGH PRESIDENT

ITA/5/2020HC Himachal Pradesh10 Sept 2020

Bench: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE TARLOK SINGH CHAUHAN,HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTSNA REWAL DUA

For Appellant: Mr. Vinay Kuthiala, Sr. Advocate
Section 143Section 154Section 244Section 244A

TDS of Rs. 45,73,528 and tax paid after original assessment of Rs. 1,71,00,320. The Department contends that the works “any amount” will not include the interest which accrued to the respondent for not refunding Rs. 45,73,528 for 57 months. We see no merit in this argument. The interest component will partake the character