BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

6 results for “TDS”+ Section 206C(7)clear

Sorted by relevance

Bangalore239Pune205Delhi182Chennai152Mumbai60Kolkata46Raipur44Ahmedabad26Cochin26Karnataka26Jabalpur23Jodhpur20Jaipur19Rajkot18Nagpur15Indore13Surat12Panaji10Dehradun8Lucknow8Hyderabad6Himachal Pradesh6Cuttack6Chandigarh6Amritsar5Guwahati4Visakhapatnam3Telangana2Varanasi2Calcutta1SC1Rajasthan1

Key Topics

Section 318Section 206C12Section 2(13)6Section 66TDS6Addition to Income6

ASSTT. EXCISE TAXATION COMMISSIONER vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER(TDS)

The appeals are disposed of accordingly

ITA/44/2010HC Himachal Pradesh10 Aug 2023

Bench: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE MAMIDANNA SATYA RATNA SRI RAMACHANDRA RAO,HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY MOHAN GOEL

Section 2(13)Section 206CSection 3Section 6

7 Company (India) Private Ltd 1, Singapore Airlines Limited Versus Commissioner of Income Tax, Delhi 2 and Hindustan Coca Cola Beverage (P) Ltd. Versus Commissioner of Income Tax3. 15) In all these cases it was held that the recipient of the income on which TDS has not been deducted, even though it was liable to such deduction under the Income

ASSTT.EXCISE AND TAXATION COMMISSIONER vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER(TDS) PALAMPUR

The appeals are disposed of accordingly

ITA/56/2009HC Himachal Pradesh10 Aug 2023

Bench: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE MAMIDANNA SATYA RATNA SRI RAMACHANDRA RAO,HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY MOHAN GOEL

Section 2(13)Section 206CSection 3Section 6

7 Company (India) Private Ltd 1, Singapore Airlines Limited Versus Commissioner of Income Tax, Delhi 2 and Hindustan Coca Cola Beverage (P) Ltd. Versus Commissioner of Income Tax3. 15) In all these cases it was held that the recipient of the income on which TDS has not been deducted, even though it was liable to such deduction under the Income

ASSTT.EXCISE TAXATION COMMISSONER vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER (TDS) PALAMPUR

The appeals are disposed of accordingly

ITA/60/2009HC Himachal Pradesh10 Aug 2023

Bench: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE MAMIDANNA SATYA RATNA SRI RAMACHANDRA RAO,HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY MOHAN GOEL

Section 2(13)Section 206CSection 3Section 6

7 Company (India) Private Ltd 1, Singapore Airlines Limited Versus Commissioner of Income Tax, Delhi 2 and Hindustan Coca Cola Beverage (P) Ltd. Versus Commissioner of Income Tax3. 15) In all these cases it was held that the recipient of the income on which TDS has not been deducted, even though it was liable to such deduction under the Income

ASSTT.EXCICETAXATION COMMISSIONER NAHAN vs. THE INCOME TAX OFFICER

The appeals are disposed of accordingly

ITA/36/2010HC Himachal Pradesh10 Aug 2023

Bench: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE MAMIDANNA SATYA RATNA SRI RAMACHANDRA RAO,HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY MOHAN GOEL

Section 2(13)Section 206CSection 3Section 6

7 Company (India) Private Ltd 1, Singapore Airlines Limited Versus Commissioner of Income Tax, Delhi 2 and Hindustan Coca Cola Beverage (P) Ltd. Versus Commissioner of Income Tax3. 15) In all these cases it was held that the recipient of the income on which TDS has not been deducted, even though it was liable to such deduction under the Income

ASST.EXCISE TAXATION COMMISSIONER vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER(TDS) PALAMPUR

The appeals are disposed of accordingly

ITA/59/2009HC Himachal Pradesh10 Aug 2023

Bench: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE MAMIDANNA SATYA RATNA SRI RAMACHANDRA RAO,HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY MOHAN GOEL

Section 2(13)Section 206CSection 3Section 6

7 Company (India) Private Ltd 1, Singapore Airlines Limited Versus Commissioner of Income Tax, Delhi 2 and Hindustan Coca Cola Beverage (P) Ltd. Versus Commissioner of Income Tax3. 15) In all these cases it was held that the recipient of the income on which TDS has not been deducted, even though it was liable to such deduction under the Income

ASSTT.EXCISE TAXATION COMMISSIONER vs. ASSTT.COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX

The appeals are disposed of accordingly

ITA/14/2011HC Himachal Pradesh10 Aug 2023

Bench: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE MAMIDANNA SATYA RATNA SRI RAMACHANDRA RAO,HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY MOHAN GOEL

Section 2(13)Section 206CSection 3Section 6

7 Company (India) Private Ltd 1, Singapore Airlines Limited Versus Commissioner of Income Tax, Delhi 2 and Hindustan Coca Cola Beverage (P) Ltd. Versus Commissioner of Income Tax3. 15) In all these cases it was held that the recipient of the income on which TDS has not been deducted, even though it was liable to such deduction under the Income