ASSTT.EXCISE TAXATION COMMISSONER vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER (TDS) PALAMPUR

The appeals are disposed of accordingly

Bench: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE MAMIDANNA SATYA RATNA SRI RAMACHANDRA RAO,HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY MOHAN GOEL

7 Company (India) Private Ltd 1, Singapore Airlines Limited Versus Commissioner of Income Tax, Delhi 2 and Hindustan Coca Cola Beverage (P) Ltd. Versus Commissioner of Income Tax3. 15) In all these cases it was held that the recipient of the income on which TDS has not been deducted, even though it was liable to such deduction under the Income

ASSTT.EXCICETAXATION COMMISSIONER NAHAN vs. THE INCOME TAX OFFICER

The appeals are disposed of accordingly

Bench: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE MAMIDANNA SATYA RATNA SRI RAMACHANDRA RAO,HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY MOHAN GOEL

7 Company (India) Private Ltd 1, Singapore Airlines Limited Versus Commissioner of Income Tax, Delhi 2 and Hindustan Coca Cola Beverage (P) Ltd. Versus Commissioner of Income Tax3. 15) In all these cases it was held that the recipient of the income on which TDS has not been deducted, even though it was liable to such deduction under the Income

ASST.EXCISE TAXATION COMMISSIONER vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER(TDS) PALAMPUR

The appeals are disposed of accordingly

Bench: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE MAMIDANNA SATYA RATNA SRI RAMACHANDRA RAO,HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY MOHAN GOEL

7 Company (India) Private Ltd 1, Singapore Airlines Limited Versus Commissioner of Income Tax, Delhi 2 and Hindustan Coca Cola Beverage (P) Ltd. Versus Commissioner of Income Tax3. 15) In all these cases it was held that the recipient of the income on which TDS has not been deducted, even though it was liable to such deduction under the Income

ASSTT.EXCISE TAXATION COMMISSIONER vs. ASSTT.COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX

The appeals are disposed of accordingly

Bench: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE MAMIDANNA SATYA RATNA SRI RAMACHANDRA RAO,HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY MOHAN GOEL

7 Company (India) Private Ltd 1, Singapore Airlines Limited Versus Commissioner of Income Tax, Delhi 2 and Hindustan Coca Cola Beverage (P) Ltd. Versus Commissioner of Income Tax3. 15) In all these cases it was held that the recipient of the income on which TDS has not been deducted, even though it was liable to such deduction under the Income

PR. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX SHIMLA vs. M/S AMBUJA DARLA KASHLOG MANGOO

Bench: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE L. NARAYANA SWAMY,HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTSNA REWAL DUA

TDS were issued in favour of the assessee. However, interest under Section 244-A of the Act was 1 Whether the reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment? - 2 - not paid in respect of some of the refunds, while in the case of some other refunds, interest was paid for a shorter period than what

PR. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, SHIMLA vs. MS SOLAN DISTRICT TRUCK OPERATORS TRANSPORT CO OPERATIVE SOCIETY LTD DARLAGHAT THROUGH PRESIDENT

Bench: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE TARLOK SINGH CHAUHAN,HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTSNA REWAL DUA

TDS were issued in favour of the assessee. However, interest under Section 244-A of the Act was not paid in respect of some of the refunds, while in the case of some other refunds, interest was paid for a shorter period than what was claimed by the assessee. It is averred in the appeal that the interest was refused