BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

6 results for “TDS”+ Deductionclear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai5,976Delhi5,477Bangalore2,647Chennai2,237Kolkata1,851Pune1,070Patna747Ahmedabad688Cochin587Hyderabad580Jaipur444Karnataka443Indore393Chandigarh353Nagpur339Raipur304Surat204Visakhapatnam177Rajkot165Lucknow160Cuttack133Jodhpur108Amritsar104Ranchi85Panaji72Telangana68Agra65Dehradun65Guwahati56Jabalpur41Varanasi26SC25Allahabad24Calcutta21Kerala17Rajasthan6Himachal Pradesh6J&K5Punjab & Haryana5Orissa4Uttarakhand2A.K. SIKRI ROHINTON FALI NARIMAN1Gauhati1

Key Topics

Section 318Section 206C12Section 2(13)6Section 66TDS6Addition to Income6

ASSTT. EXCISE TAXATION COMMISSIONER vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER(TDS)

The appeals are disposed of accordingly

ITA/44/2010HC Himachal Pradesh10 Aug 2023

Bench: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE MAMIDANNA SATYA RATNA SRI RAMACHANDRA RAO,HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY MOHAN GOEL

Section 2(13)Section 206CSection 3Section 6

TDS has not been deducted, even though it was liable to such deduction under the Income Tax Act, had already

ASSTT.EXCISE AND TAXATION COMMISSIONER vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER(TDS) PALAMPUR

The appeals are disposed of accordingly

ITA/56/2009HC Himachal Pradesh
10 Aug 2023

Bench: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE MAMIDANNA SATYA RATNA SRI RAMACHANDRA RAO,HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY MOHAN GOEL

Section 2(13)Section 206CSection 3Section 6

TDS has not been deducted, even though it was liable to such deduction under the Income Tax Act, had already

ASSTT.EXCISE TAXATION COMMISSONER vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER (TDS) PALAMPUR

The appeals are disposed of accordingly

ITA/60/2009HC Himachal Pradesh10 Aug 2023

Bench: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE MAMIDANNA SATYA RATNA SRI RAMACHANDRA RAO,HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY MOHAN GOEL

Section 2(13)Section 206CSection 3Section 6

TDS has not been deducted, even though it was liable to such deduction under the Income Tax Act, had already

ASSTT.EXCICETAXATION COMMISSIONER NAHAN vs. THE INCOME TAX OFFICER

The appeals are disposed of accordingly

ITA/36/2010HC Himachal Pradesh10 Aug 2023

Bench: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE MAMIDANNA SATYA RATNA SRI RAMACHANDRA RAO,HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY MOHAN GOEL

Section 2(13)Section 206CSection 3Section 6

TDS has not been deducted, even though it was liable to such deduction under the Income Tax Act, had already

ASST.EXCISE TAXATION COMMISSIONER vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER(TDS) PALAMPUR

The appeals are disposed of accordingly

ITA/59/2009HC Himachal Pradesh10 Aug 2023

Bench: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE MAMIDANNA SATYA RATNA SRI RAMACHANDRA RAO,HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY MOHAN GOEL

Section 2(13)Section 206CSection 3Section 6

TDS has not been deducted, even though it was liable to such deduction under the Income Tax Act, had already

ASSTT.EXCISE TAXATION COMMISSIONER vs. ASSTT.COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX

The appeals are disposed of accordingly

ITA/14/2011HC Himachal Pradesh10 Aug 2023

Bench: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE MAMIDANNA SATYA RATNA SRI RAMACHANDRA RAO,HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY MOHAN GOEL

Section 2(13)Section 206CSection 3Section 6

TDS has not been deducted, even though it was liable to such deduction under the Income Tax Act, had already