M/S. BHARTIA-SMSIL(JV),GUWAHATI vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-3(1), GUWAHATI
In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed
ITA 117/GTY/2019[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Guwahati17 Jun 2020AY 2014-15
Bench: Shri A. T. Varkey, Jm &Dr. A.L.Saini, Am आयकरअपीलसं./Ita No.117/Gau/2019 ("नधा"रणवष" / Assessment Year:2014-15)
For Appellant: Shri Sanjay Modi, FCAFor Respondent: Shri M.K. Dal, Addl. CIT, Sr. Dr
Section 143(3)Section 263Section 3Section 92BSection 92C
transfer takes place. Further, the High Court has missed the key words “not utilized” in sub- section (2) which would show that it is enough that the capital gain made by the assessee should only be “utilized” by him in the assessment year in question for all or any of the purposes aforesaid, that is towards purchase and acquisition