BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

3 results for “transfer pricing”+ Section 83clear

Sorted by relevance

Delhi1,402Mumbai1,350Bangalore597Karnataka320Ahmedabad314Kolkata292Chennai279Jaipur240Hyderabad211Surat181Chandigarh173Pune145Cochin143Indore142Calcutta55Rajkot54Visakhapatnam42Lucknow40Cuttack38Raipur36Nagpur34Agra32Telangana25SC23Jodhpur19Amritsar18Dehradun11Varanasi9Rajasthan8Allahabad7Panaji6Kerala5Guwahati3Ranchi2Orissa2Jabalpur2Andhra Pradesh1

Key Topics

Section 6810Section 143(3)4Section 2503Addition to Income3Capital Gains2Natural Justice2

GREENLAM INDUSTRIES LIMITED,TINSUKIA vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-TINSUKIA, TINSUKIA

In the result, appeal filed by the assessee is allowed as per the terms indicated above

ITA 402/GTY/2019[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Guwahati19 Dec 2022AY 2015-16

Bench: Sri Rajpal Yadav(Kz) & Dr. Manish Borad

Section 115JSection 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 244ASection 25Section 250Section 251(1)(a)Section 31(3)(a)

83,979/-. 4. Aggrieved, the assessee preferred appeal before ld. CIT(A) and partly succeeded. 5. Aggrieved, the assessee is now in appeal before this Tribunal. From perusal of the above grounds, we find that ground nos. 2 & 3 were not raised before ld. CIT(A) and they have been raised for the first time before this Tribunal. This being

INDER CHAND SAND,SILCHAR vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-2, SILCHAR

In the result, both the appeals filed by the assessees in ITA

ITA 49/GTY/2020[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Guwahati23 Dec 2022AY 2015-16

Bench: Sri Rajpal Yadav(Kz) & Dr. Manish Borad

Section 143(3)Section 250Section 68

transfer of Shares in M/s. Pine Animations Ltd and shares of M/s. Jackson Investments Ltd of Rs. 50,40,340/- 12. That the Authorities erred in not providing complete details to the assessee before completing the assessment. 13. The appellant denies the liabilities for interest u/s 234A, 234B and 234C of the Act. Further prays that the interest

SAROJ DEVI SAND,SILCHAR vs. INCOEM TAX OFFICER, WARD-3, SILCHAR

In the result, both the appeals filed by the assessees in ITA

ITA 51/GTY/2020[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Guwahati23 Dec 2022AY 2015-16

Bench: Sri Rajpal Yadav(Kz) & Dr. Manish Borad

Section 143(3)Section 250Section 68

transfer of Shares in M/s. Pine Animations Ltd and shares of M/s. Jackson Investments Ltd of Rs. 50,40,340/- 12. That the Authorities erred in not providing complete details to the assessee before completing the assessment. 13. The appellant denies the liabilities for interest u/s 234A, 234B and 234C of the Act. Further prays that the interest