D.C.I.T., CIRCLE-1, DIBRUGARH vs. BACHH RAJ BAMALWA, DIBRUGARH

In the result, all the appeals of the Revenue are dismissed and that of the Cross Objections of the assessees are allowed

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav, Vice-(Kz) & Shri Rajesh Kumar

75,89,343 PB-14 BAMALWA India Ltd. 15. PRAMOD KUMAR 2013-14 Twenty First Century 3,93,36,039 PB-15 BAMALWA India Ltd. 16. VINOD 2013-14 Twenty First Century 2,39,89,732 PB-16 BAMALWA India Ltd. TOTAL ADDITION 64,48,50,444 10. Keeping in mind the above details, brief facts are that all these

D.C.I.T., CIRCLE-1, DIBRUGARH vs. BACHH RAJ BAMALWA, DIBRUGARH

In the result, all the appeals of the Revenue are dismissed and that of the Cross Objections of the assessees are allowed

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav, Vice-(Kz) & Shri Rajesh Kumar

75,89,343 PB-14 BAMALWA India Ltd. 15. PRAMOD KUMAR 2013-14 Twenty First Century 3,93,36,039 PB-15 BAMALWA India Ltd. 16. VINOD 2013-14 Twenty First Century 2,39,89,732 PB-16 BAMALWA India Ltd. TOTAL ADDITION 64,48,50,444 10. Keeping in mind the above details, brief facts are that all these

D.C.I.T., CIRCLE- 1, DIBRUGARH vs. HANS RAJ BAMALWA, DIBRUGARH

In the result, all the appeals of the Revenue are dismissed and that of the Cross Objections of the assessees are allowed

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav, Vice-(Kz) & Shri Rajesh Kumar

75,89,343 PB-14 BAMALWA India Ltd. 15. PRAMOD KUMAR 2013-14 Twenty First Century 3,93,36,039 PB-15 BAMALWA India Ltd. 16. VINOD 2013-14 Twenty First Century 2,39,89,732 PB-16 BAMALWA India Ltd. TOTAL ADDITION 64,48,50,444 10. Keeping in mind the above details, brief facts are that all these

D.C.I.T., CIRCLE- 1, DIBRUGARH vs. HANS RAJ BAMALWA (HUF), DIBRUGARH

In the result, all the appeals of the Revenue are dismissed and that of the Cross Objections of the assessees are allowed

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav, Vice-(Kz) & Shri Rajesh Kumar

75,89,343 PB-14 BAMALWA India Ltd. 15. PRAMOD KUMAR 2013-14 Twenty First Century 3,93,36,039 PB-15 BAMALWA India Ltd. 16. VINOD 2013-14 Twenty First Century 2,39,89,732 PB-16 BAMALWA India Ltd. TOTAL ADDITION 64,48,50,444 10. Keeping in mind the above details, brief facts are that all these

D.C.I.T., CIRCLE- 1, DIBRUGARH vs. USHA BAMALWA, DIBRUGARH

In the result, all the appeals of the Revenue are dismissed and that of the Cross Objections of the assessees are allowed

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav, Vice-(Kz) & Shri Rajesh Kumar

75,89,343 PB-14 BAMALWA India Ltd. 15. PRAMOD KUMAR 2013-14 Twenty First Century 3,93,36,039 PB-15 BAMALWA India Ltd. 16. VINOD 2013-14 Twenty First Century 2,39,89,732 PB-16 BAMALWA India Ltd. TOTAL ADDITION 64,48,50,444 10. Keeping in mind the above details, brief facts are that all these

D.C.I.T., CIRCLE- 1, DIBRUGARH vs. MEENAKSHI BAMALWA SONI, DIBRUGARH

In the result, all the appeals of the Revenue are dismissed and that of the Cross Objections of the assessees are allowed

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav, Vice-(Kz) & Shri Rajesh Kumar

75,89,343 PB-14 BAMALWA India Ltd. 15. PRAMOD KUMAR 2013-14 Twenty First Century 3,93,36,039 PB-15 BAMALWA India Ltd. 16. VINOD 2013-14 Twenty First Century 2,39,89,732 PB-16 BAMALWA India Ltd. TOTAL ADDITION 64,48,50,444 10. Keeping in mind the above details, brief facts are that all these

D.C.I.T., CIRCLE- 1, DIBRUGARH vs. BHAGWATI DEVII BAMALWA , DIBRUGARH

In the result, all the appeals of the Revenue are dismissed and that of the Cross Objections of the assessees are allowed

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav, Vice-(Kz) & Shri Rajesh Kumar

75,89,343 PB-14 BAMALWA India Ltd. 15. PRAMOD KUMAR 2013-14 Twenty First Century 3,93,36,039 PB-15 BAMALWA India Ltd. 16. VINOD 2013-14 Twenty First Century 2,39,89,732 PB-16 BAMALWA India Ltd. TOTAL ADDITION 64,48,50,444 10. Keeping in mind the above details, brief facts are that all these

D.C.I.T., CIRCLE- 1, DIBRUGARH vs. VISHAL BAMALWA , DIBRUGARH

In the result, all the appeals of the Revenue are dismissed and that of the Cross Objections of the assessees are allowed

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav, Vice-(Kz) & Shri Rajesh Kumar

75,89,343 PB-14 BAMALWA India Ltd. 15. PRAMOD KUMAR 2013-14 Twenty First Century 3,93,36,039 PB-15 BAMALWA India Ltd. 16. VINOD 2013-14 Twenty First Century 2,39,89,732 PB-16 BAMALWA India Ltd. TOTAL ADDITION 64,48,50,444 10. Keeping in mind the above details, brief facts are that all these

D.C.I.T., CIRCLE-1, DIBRUGARH vs. VINAY BAMALWA, DIBRUGARH

In the result, all the appeals of the Revenue are dismissed and that of the Cross Objections of the assessees are allowed

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav, Vice-(Kz) & Shri Rajesh Kumar

75,89,343 PB-14 BAMALWA India Ltd. 15. PRAMOD KUMAR 2013-14 Twenty First Century 3,93,36,039 PB-15 BAMALWA India Ltd. 16. VINOD 2013-14 Twenty First Century 2,39,89,732 PB-16 BAMALWA India Ltd. TOTAL ADDITION 64,48,50,444 10. Keeping in mind the above details, brief facts are that all these

D.C.I.T., CIRCLE-1, DIBRUGARH vs. RAVI BAMALWA, DIBRUGARH

In the result, all the appeals of the Revenue are dismissed and that of the Cross Objections of the assessees are allowed

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav, Vice-(Kz) & Shri Rajesh Kumar

75,89,343 PB-14 BAMALWA India Ltd. 15. PRAMOD KUMAR 2013-14 Twenty First Century 3,93,36,039 PB-15 BAMALWA India Ltd. 16. VINOD 2013-14 Twenty First Century 2,39,89,732 PB-16 BAMALWA India Ltd. TOTAL ADDITION 64,48,50,444 10. Keeping in mind the above details, brief facts are that all these

D.C.I.T., CIRCLE-1, DIBRUGARH vs. MADAN LAL BAMALWA, DIBRUGARH

In the result, all the appeals of the Revenue are dismissed and that of the Cross Objections of the assessees are allowed

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav, Vice-(Kz) & Shri Rajesh Kumar

75,89,343 PB-14 BAMALWA India Ltd. 15. PRAMOD KUMAR 2013-14 Twenty First Century 3,93,36,039 PB-15 BAMALWA India Ltd. 16. VINOD 2013-14 Twenty First Century 2,39,89,732 PB-16 BAMALWA India Ltd. TOTAL ADDITION 64,48,50,444 10. Keeping in mind the above details, brief facts are that all these

D.C.I.T., CIRCLE-1, DIBRUGARH vs. SHEETAL BAMALWA, DIBRUGARH

In the result, all the appeals of the Revenue are dismissed and that of the Cross Objections of the assessees are allowed

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav, Vice-(Kz) & Shri Rajesh Kumar

75,89,343 PB-14 BAMALWA India Ltd. 15. PRAMOD KUMAR 2013-14 Twenty First Century 3,93,36,039 PB-15 BAMALWA India Ltd. 16. VINOD 2013-14 Twenty First Century 2,39,89,732 PB-16 BAMALWA India Ltd. TOTAL ADDITION 64,48,50,444 10. Keeping in mind the above details, brief facts are that all these

D.C.I.T., CIRCLE-1, DIBRUGARH vs. PRAMOD KUMAR BAMALWA, DIBRUGARH

In the result, all the appeals of the Revenue are dismissed and that of the Cross Objections of the assessees are allowed

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav, Vice-(Kz) & Shri Rajesh Kumar

75,89,343 PB-14 BAMALWA India Ltd. 15. PRAMOD KUMAR 2013-14 Twenty First Century 3,93,36,039 PB-15 BAMALWA India Ltd. 16. VINOD 2013-14 Twenty First Century 2,39,89,732 PB-16 BAMALWA India Ltd. TOTAL ADDITION 64,48,50,444 10. Keeping in mind the above details, brief facts are that all these

D.C.I.T., CIRCLE-1, DIBRUGARH vs. VINOD BAMALWA, DIBRUGARH

In the result, all the appeals of the Revenue are dismissed and that of the Cross Objections of the assessees are allowed

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav, Vice-(Kz) & Shri Rajesh Kumar

75,89,343 PB-14 BAMALWA India Ltd. 15. PRAMOD KUMAR 2013-14 Twenty First Century 3,93,36,039 PB-15 BAMALWA India Ltd. 16. VINOD 2013-14 Twenty First Century 2,39,89,732 PB-16 BAMALWA India Ltd. TOTAL ADDITION 64,48,50,444 10. Keeping in mind the above details, brief facts are that all these

INDER CHAND SAND,SILCHAR vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-2, SILCHAR

In the result, both the appeals filed by the assessees in ITA

Bench: Sri Rajpal Yadav(Kz) & Dr. Manish Borad

transfer of Shares in M/s. Pine Animations Ltd and shares of M/s. Jackson Investments Ltd of Rs. 50,40,340/- 12. That the Authorities erred in not providing complete details to the assessee before completing the assessment. 13. The appellant denies the liabilities for interest u/s 234A, 234B and 234C of the Act. Further prays that the interest

SAROJ DEVI SAND,SILCHAR vs. INCOEM TAX OFFICER, WARD-3, SILCHAR

In the result, both the appeals filed by the assessees in ITA

Bench: Sri Rajpal Yadav(Kz) & Dr. Manish Borad

transfer of Shares in M/s. Pine Animations Ltd and shares of M/s. Jackson Investments Ltd of Rs. 50,40,340/- 12. That the Authorities erred in not providing complete details to the assessee before completing the assessment. 13. The appellant denies the liabilities for interest u/s 234A, 234B and 234C of the Act. Further prays that the interest

ACCRECENT WAY MARKETING (P) LTD.,GUWAHATI vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-3, GUWAHATI

Bench: Shri Manomohan Das & Shri Rakesh Mishra

75,687/- and the object of the company is trading of various FMCG products and insurance products and after meeting various expenditure incidental to its business, the net profit has been disclosed at Rs. 1,06,48,066/- which is worked out to 3.36% of the gross receipts. The Ld. AO noted that the assessee company raised share application money

MANOJ ANAND,GUWAHATI vs. ITO W-2(2) GHY, GUWAHATI

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed

Bench: Shri Rajesh Kumar, Am & Shri Manomohan Das, Jm Manoj Anand Ito W-2(2), Ghy Flat 4D, Garima Grand, Aaykar Bhawan, Christian Basti, Departmental Representative B. G.S. Road, Guwahati-781005, Vs. Baruah Road, Guwahati-781007, Assam Assam (Appellant) (Respondent) Pan No. Agbpa9883C

transferred either to Aarda Foundation or the appellant Mr. Manoj Anand on the same day. This also shows the suspicious nature of activity being carried out by M/s Urch Trading Pvt. Ltd. without any business rationale. Considering the above facts of the case and in law, I fully concur with the findings given by the AO in the assessment order