SHRI BIMAL PAUL,SILCHAR vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-1, SILCHAR

In the result, both the appeals of the assessee are dismissed

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav & Shri Girish Agrawalassessment Year: 2010-11 & Assessment Year: 2011-12

Pricing Officer during the course of assessment/reassessment proceedings. These time limits are either from the end of the financial year in which the notice for initiation of the proceedings was served or from the end of the assessment year to which the proceedings relate. It is proposed to amend the aforesaid sections, i.e., 153 and 153B so as to provide

D.C.I.T., CIRCLE-1, DIBRUGARH vs. BACHH RAJ BAMALWA, DIBRUGARH

In the result, all the appeals of the Revenue are dismissed and that of the Cross Objections of the assessees are allowed

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav, Vice-(Kz) & Shri Rajesh Kumar

transfer, the shares were sent to his demat a/c for credit. HDPL was amalgamated with TFCIL by order of the Hon’ble Calcutta High Court dated 23.10.2010. By virtue of the scheme of amalgamation, the Assessee was allotted on 23.12.2010, 38 shares of TFCIL against 1 share of HDPL and credited to his demat a/c. (ii) The Assessee laid special

D.C.I.T., CIRCLE-1, DIBRUGARH vs. BACHH RAJ BAMALWA, DIBRUGARH

In the result, all the appeals of the Revenue are dismissed and that of the Cross Objections of the assessees are allowed

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav, Vice-(Kz) & Shri Rajesh Kumar

transfer, the shares were sent to his demat a/c for credit. HDPL was amalgamated with TFCIL by order of the Hon’ble Calcutta High Court dated 23.10.2010. By virtue of the scheme of amalgamation, the Assessee was allotted on 23.12.2010, 38 shares of TFCIL against 1 share of HDPL and credited to his demat a/c. (ii) The Assessee laid special

D.C.I.T., CIRCLE- 1, DIBRUGARH vs. HANS RAJ BAMALWA, DIBRUGARH

In the result, all the appeals of the Revenue are dismissed and that of the Cross Objections of the assessees are allowed

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav, Vice-(Kz) & Shri Rajesh Kumar

transfer, the shares were sent to his demat a/c for credit. HDPL was amalgamated with TFCIL by order of the Hon’ble Calcutta High Court dated 23.10.2010. By virtue of the scheme of amalgamation, the Assessee was allotted on 23.12.2010, 38 shares of TFCIL against 1 share of HDPL and credited to his demat a/c. (ii) The Assessee laid special

D.C.I.T., CIRCLE- 1, DIBRUGARH vs. HANS RAJ BAMALWA (HUF), DIBRUGARH

In the result, all the appeals of the Revenue are dismissed and that of the Cross Objections of the assessees are allowed

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav, Vice-(Kz) & Shri Rajesh Kumar

transfer, the shares were sent to his demat a/c for credit. HDPL was amalgamated with TFCIL by order of the Hon’ble Calcutta High Court dated 23.10.2010. By virtue of the scheme of amalgamation, the Assessee was allotted on 23.12.2010, 38 shares of TFCIL against 1 share of HDPL and credited to his demat a/c. (ii) The Assessee laid special

D.C.I.T., CIRCLE- 1, DIBRUGARH vs. USHA BAMALWA, DIBRUGARH

In the result, all the appeals of the Revenue are dismissed and that of the Cross Objections of the assessees are allowed

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav, Vice-(Kz) & Shri Rajesh Kumar

transfer, the shares were sent to his demat a/c for credit. HDPL was amalgamated with TFCIL by order of the Hon’ble Calcutta High Court dated 23.10.2010. By virtue of the scheme of amalgamation, the Assessee was allotted on 23.12.2010, 38 shares of TFCIL against 1 share of HDPL and credited to his demat a/c. (ii) The Assessee laid special

D.C.I.T., CIRCLE- 1, DIBRUGARH vs. MEENAKSHI BAMALWA SONI, DIBRUGARH

In the result, all the appeals of the Revenue are dismissed and that of the Cross Objections of the assessees are allowed

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav, Vice-(Kz) & Shri Rajesh Kumar

transfer, the shares were sent to his demat a/c for credit. HDPL was amalgamated with TFCIL by order of the Hon’ble Calcutta High Court dated 23.10.2010. By virtue of the scheme of amalgamation, the Assessee was allotted on 23.12.2010, 38 shares of TFCIL against 1 share of HDPL and credited to his demat a/c. (ii) The Assessee laid special

D.C.I.T., CIRCLE- 1, DIBRUGARH vs. VISHAL BAMALWA , DIBRUGARH

In the result, all the appeals of the Revenue are dismissed and that of the Cross Objections of the assessees are allowed

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav, Vice-(Kz) & Shri Rajesh Kumar

transfer, the shares were sent to his demat a/c for credit. HDPL was amalgamated with TFCIL by order of the Hon’ble Calcutta High Court dated 23.10.2010. By virtue of the scheme of amalgamation, the Assessee was allotted on 23.12.2010, 38 shares of TFCIL against 1 share of HDPL and credited to his demat a/c. (ii) The Assessee laid special

D.C.I.T., CIRCLE-1, DIBRUGARH vs. VINAY BAMALWA, DIBRUGARH

In the result, all the appeals of the Revenue are dismissed and that of the Cross Objections of the assessees are allowed

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav, Vice-(Kz) & Shri Rajesh Kumar

transfer, the shares were sent to his demat a/c for credit. HDPL was amalgamated with TFCIL by order of the Hon’ble Calcutta High Court dated 23.10.2010. By virtue of the scheme of amalgamation, the Assessee was allotted on 23.12.2010, 38 shares of TFCIL against 1 share of HDPL and credited to his demat a/c. (ii) The Assessee laid special

D.C.I.T., CIRCLE-1, DIBRUGARH vs. RAVI BAMALWA, DIBRUGARH

In the result, all the appeals of the Revenue are dismissed and that of the Cross Objections of the assessees are allowed

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav, Vice-(Kz) & Shri Rajesh Kumar

transfer, the shares were sent to his demat a/c for credit. HDPL was amalgamated with TFCIL by order of the Hon’ble Calcutta High Court dated 23.10.2010. By virtue of the scheme of amalgamation, the Assessee was allotted on 23.12.2010, 38 shares of TFCIL against 1 share of HDPL and credited to his demat a/c. (ii) The Assessee laid special

D.C.I.T., CIRCLE-1, DIBRUGARH vs. MADAN LAL BAMALWA, DIBRUGARH

In the result, all the appeals of the Revenue are dismissed and that of the Cross Objections of the assessees are allowed

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav, Vice-(Kz) & Shri Rajesh Kumar

transfer, the shares were sent to his demat a/c for credit. HDPL was amalgamated with TFCIL by order of the Hon’ble Calcutta High Court dated 23.10.2010. By virtue of the scheme of amalgamation, the Assessee was allotted on 23.12.2010, 38 shares of TFCIL against 1 share of HDPL and credited to his demat a/c. (ii) The Assessee laid special

D.C.I.T., CIRCLE-1, DIBRUGARH vs. SHEETAL BAMALWA, DIBRUGARH

In the result, all the appeals of the Revenue are dismissed and that of the Cross Objections of the assessees are allowed

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav, Vice-(Kz) & Shri Rajesh Kumar

transfer, the shares were sent to his demat a/c for credit. HDPL was amalgamated with TFCIL by order of the Hon’ble Calcutta High Court dated 23.10.2010. By virtue of the scheme of amalgamation, the Assessee was allotted on 23.12.2010, 38 shares of TFCIL against 1 share of HDPL and credited to his demat a/c. (ii) The Assessee laid special

D.C.I.T., CIRCLE-1, DIBRUGARH vs. PRAMOD KUMAR BAMALWA, DIBRUGARH

In the result, all the appeals of the Revenue are dismissed and that of the Cross Objections of the assessees are allowed

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav, Vice-(Kz) & Shri Rajesh Kumar

transfer, the shares were sent to his demat a/c for credit. HDPL was amalgamated with TFCIL by order of the Hon’ble Calcutta High Court dated 23.10.2010. By virtue of the scheme of amalgamation, the Assessee was allotted on 23.12.2010, 38 shares of TFCIL against 1 share of HDPL and credited to his demat a/c. (ii) The Assessee laid special

D.C.I.T., CIRCLE-1, DIBRUGARH vs. VINOD BAMALWA, DIBRUGARH

In the result, all the appeals of the Revenue are dismissed and that of the Cross Objections of the assessees are allowed

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav, Vice-(Kz) & Shri Rajesh Kumar

transfer, the shares were sent to his demat a/c for credit. HDPL was amalgamated with TFCIL by order of the Hon’ble Calcutta High Court dated 23.10.2010. By virtue of the scheme of amalgamation, the Assessee was allotted on 23.12.2010, 38 shares of TFCIL against 1 share of HDPL and credited to his demat a/c. (ii) The Assessee laid special

D.C.I.T., CIRCLE- 1, DIBRUGARH vs. BHAGWATI DEVII BAMALWA , DIBRUGARH

In the result, all the appeals of the Revenue are dismissed and that of the Cross Objections of the assessees are allowed

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav, Vice-(Kz) & Shri Rajesh Kumar

transfer, the shares were sent to his demat a/c for credit. HDPL was amalgamated with TFCIL by order of the Hon’ble Calcutta High Court dated 23.10.2010. By virtue of the scheme of amalgamation, the Assessee was allotted on 23.12.2010, 38 shares of TFCIL against 1 share of HDPL and credited to his demat a/c. (ii) The Assessee laid special

DCIT, CIRCLE-1, DIBRUGARH vs. BAJRANG LAL BAMALWA, DIBRUGARH

In the result, all the appeals of the Revenue are dismissed and that of the Cross Objections of the assessees are allowed

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav, Vice-(Kz) & Shri Rajesh Kumar

transfer, the shares were sent to his demat a/c for credit. HDPL was amalgamated with TFCIL by order of the Hon’ble Calcutta High Court dated 23.10.2010. By virtue of the scheme of amalgamation, the Assessee was allotted on 23.12.2010, 38 shares of TFCIL against 1 share of HDPL and credited to his demat a/c. (ii) The Assessee laid special

DCIT, CIRCLE-1, DIBRUGARH vs. BAJRANG LAL BAMALWA, DIBRUGARH

In the result, all the appeals of the Revenue are dismissed and that of the Cross Objections of the assessees are allowed

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav, Vice-(Kz) & Shri Rajesh Kumar

transfer, the shares were sent to his demat a/c for credit. HDPL was amalgamated with TFCIL by order of the Hon’ble Calcutta High Court dated 23.10.2010. By virtue of the scheme of amalgamation, the Assessee was allotted on 23.12.2010, 38 shares of TFCIL against 1 share of HDPL and credited to his demat a/c. (ii) The Assessee laid special

ACCRECENT WAY MARKETING (P) LTD.,GUWAHATI vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-3, GUWAHATI

Bench: Shri Manomohan Das & Shri Rakesh Mishra

prices of the scripts of very little known companies. 25. While on this issue it would be beneficial to take note of the decision in Yadu Hari Dalmia v. Commissioner of Income Tax, Delhi (Central) (1980) 126 ITR 48 wherein it was held that the whole catena of sections starting from Section 68 have been introduced in the taxing enactment