BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

2 results for “transfer pricing”+ Section 234Dclear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai136Delhi100Bangalore18Raipur17Ahmedabad17Hyderabad11Cochin6Kolkata4Indore3Surat3Jodhpur2Guwahati2Jaipur2Pune2Ranchi1Visakhapatnam1

Key Topics

Section 143(3)8Section 143(2)4Section 1424Section 153(1)2Limitation/Time-bar2

SHRI BIMAL PAUL,SILCHAR vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-1, SILCHAR

In the result, both the appeals of the assessee are dismissed

ITA 211/GTY/2014[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Guwahati06 Oct 2023AY 2010-11

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav & Shri Girish Agrawalassessment Year: 2010-11 & Assessment Year: 2011-12

For Appellant: N o n eFor Respondent: Shri Arun Bhowmick, JCIT
Section 142Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 153(1)

234D of the Act, are recorded in the body of the assessment order leading to the eventual quantification of the amount payable at Rs.15,16,830/-. This is the same amount that has been recorded in the corresponding Notice of Demand dated March 12, 2013, issued to the appellant by the Assessing Officer vide his office Memo No. AJMPP9568K/W-1/Sil/1879. Hence

SHRI BIMAL PAUL,SILCHAR vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-1, SILCHAR

In the result, both the appeals of the assessee are dismissed

ITA 8/GTY/2016[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Guwahati06 Oct 2023AY 2011-12

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav & Shri Girish Agrawalassessment Year: 2010-11 & Assessment Year: 2011-12

For Appellant: N o n eFor Respondent: Shri Arun Bhowmick, JCIT
Section 142Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 153(1)

234D of the Act, are recorded in the body of the assessment order leading to the eventual quantification of the amount payable at Rs.15,16,830/-. This is the same amount that has been recorded in the corresponding Notice of Demand dated March 12, 2013, issued to the appellant by the Assessing Officer vide his office Memo No. AJMPP9568K/W-1/Sil/1879. Hence