SHRI BIMAL PAUL,SILCHAR vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-1, SILCHAR

In the result, both the appeals of the assessee are dismissed

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav & Shri Girish Agrawalassessment Year: 2010-11 & Assessment Year: 2011-12

Pricing Officer during the course of assessment/reassessment proceedings. These time limits are either from the end of the financial year in which the notice for initiation of the proceedings was served or from the end of the assessment year to which the proceedings relate. It is proposed to amend the aforesaid sections, i.e., 153 and 153B so as to provide

DCIT, CIRCLE-1, DIBRUGARH vs. BAJRANG LAL BAMALWA, DIBRUGARH

In the result, all the appeals of the Revenue are dismissed and that of the Cross Objections of the assessees are allowed

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav, Vice-(Kz) & Shri Rajesh Kumar

forwarded by the DIT, Kolkata, which was based upon the search carried out upon some third entity. It is just a theoretical compilation of certain facts, which was never examined analytically by any authority because it is not disclosed by the ld. Assessing Officer, whether any addition was made in the hands of those entry providers/brokers and if made, then

DCIT, CIRCLE-1, DIBRUGARH vs. BAJRANG LAL BAMALWA, DIBRUGARH

In the result, all the appeals of the Revenue are dismissed and that of the Cross Objections of the assessees are allowed

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav, Vice-(Kz) & Shri Rajesh Kumar

forwarded by the DIT, Kolkata, which was based upon the search carried out upon some third entity. It is just a theoretical compilation of certain facts, which was never examined analytically by any authority because it is not disclosed by the ld. Assessing Officer, whether any addition was made in the hands of those entry providers/brokers and if made, then

D.C.I.T., CIRCLE-1, DIBRUGARH vs. BACHH RAJ BAMALWA, DIBRUGARH

In the result, all the appeals of the Revenue are dismissed and that of the Cross Objections of the assessees are allowed

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav, Vice-(Kz) & Shri Rajesh Kumar

forwarded by the DIT, Kolkata, which was based upon the search carried out upon some third entity. It is just a theoretical compilation of certain facts, which was never examined analytically by any authority because it is not disclosed by the ld. Assessing Officer, whether any addition was made in the hands of those entry providers/brokers and if made, then

D.C.I.T., CIRCLE-1, DIBRUGARH vs. BACHH RAJ BAMALWA, DIBRUGARH

In the result, all the appeals of the Revenue are dismissed and that of the Cross Objections of the assessees are allowed

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav, Vice-(Kz) & Shri Rajesh Kumar

forwarded by the DIT, Kolkata, which was based upon the search carried out upon some third entity. It is just a theoretical compilation of certain facts, which was never examined analytically by any authority because it is not disclosed by the ld. Assessing Officer, whether any addition was made in the hands of those entry providers/brokers and if made, then

D.C.I.T., CIRCLE- 1, DIBRUGARH vs. HANS RAJ BAMALWA, DIBRUGARH

In the result, all the appeals of the Revenue are dismissed and that of the Cross Objections of the assessees are allowed

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav, Vice-(Kz) & Shri Rajesh Kumar

forwarded by the DIT, Kolkata, which was based upon the search carried out upon some third entity. It is just a theoretical compilation of certain facts, which was never examined analytically by any authority because it is not disclosed by the ld. Assessing Officer, whether any addition was made in the hands of those entry providers/brokers and if made, then

D.C.I.T., CIRCLE- 1, DIBRUGARH vs. HANS RAJ BAMALWA (HUF), DIBRUGARH

In the result, all the appeals of the Revenue are dismissed and that of the Cross Objections of the assessees are allowed

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav, Vice-(Kz) & Shri Rajesh Kumar

forwarded by the DIT, Kolkata, which was based upon the search carried out upon some third entity. It is just a theoretical compilation of certain facts, which was never examined analytically by any authority because it is not disclosed by the ld. Assessing Officer, whether any addition was made in the hands of those entry providers/brokers and if made, then

D.C.I.T., CIRCLE- 1, DIBRUGARH vs. USHA BAMALWA, DIBRUGARH

In the result, all the appeals of the Revenue are dismissed and that of the Cross Objections of the assessees are allowed

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav, Vice-(Kz) & Shri Rajesh Kumar

forwarded by the DIT, Kolkata, which was based upon the search carried out upon some third entity. It is just a theoretical compilation of certain facts, which was never examined analytically by any authority because it is not disclosed by the ld. Assessing Officer, whether any addition was made in the hands of those entry providers/brokers and if made, then

D.C.I.T., CIRCLE- 1, DIBRUGARH vs. MEENAKSHI BAMALWA SONI, DIBRUGARH

In the result, all the appeals of the Revenue are dismissed and that of the Cross Objections of the assessees are allowed

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav, Vice-(Kz) & Shri Rajesh Kumar

forwarded by the DIT, Kolkata, which was based upon the search carried out upon some third entity. It is just a theoretical compilation of certain facts, which was never examined analytically by any authority because it is not disclosed by the ld. Assessing Officer, whether any addition was made in the hands of those entry providers/brokers and if made, then

D.C.I.T., CIRCLE- 1, DIBRUGARH vs. BHAGWATI DEVII BAMALWA , DIBRUGARH

In the result, all the appeals of the Revenue are dismissed and that of the Cross Objections of the assessees are allowed

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav, Vice-(Kz) & Shri Rajesh Kumar

forwarded by the DIT, Kolkata, which was based upon the search carried out upon some third entity. It is just a theoretical compilation of certain facts, which was never examined analytically by any authority because it is not disclosed by the ld. Assessing Officer, whether any addition was made in the hands of those entry providers/brokers and if made, then

D.C.I.T., CIRCLE- 1, DIBRUGARH vs. VISHAL BAMALWA , DIBRUGARH

In the result, all the appeals of the Revenue are dismissed and that of the Cross Objections of the assessees are allowed

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav, Vice-(Kz) & Shri Rajesh Kumar

forwarded by the DIT, Kolkata, which was based upon the search carried out upon some third entity. It is just a theoretical compilation of certain facts, which was never examined analytically by any authority because it is not disclosed by the ld. Assessing Officer, whether any addition was made in the hands of those entry providers/brokers and if made, then

D.C.I.T., CIRCLE-1, DIBRUGARH vs. VINAY BAMALWA, DIBRUGARH

In the result, all the appeals of the Revenue are dismissed and that of the Cross Objections of the assessees are allowed

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav, Vice-(Kz) & Shri Rajesh Kumar

forwarded by the DIT, Kolkata, which was based upon the search carried out upon some third entity. It is just a theoretical compilation of certain facts, which was never examined analytically by any authority because it is not disclosed by the ld. Assessing Officer, whether any addition was made in the hands of those entry providers/brokers and if made, then

D.C.I.T., CIRCLE-1, DIBRUGARH vs. RAVI BAMALWA, DIBRUGARH

In the result, all the appeals of the Revenue are dismissed and that of the Cross Objections of the assessees are allowed

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav, Vice-(Kz) & Shri Rajesh Kumar

forwarded by the DIT, Kolkata, which was based upon the search carried out upon some third entity. It is just a theoretical compilation of certain facts, which was never examined analytically by any authority because it is not disclosed by the ld. Assessing Officer, whether any addition was made in the hands of those entry providers/brokers and if made, then

D.C.I.T., CIRCLE-1, DIBRUGARH vs. MADAN LAL BAMALWA, DIBRUGARH

In the result, all the appeals of the Revenue are dismissed and that of the Cross Objections of the assessees are allowed

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav, Vice-(Kz) & Shri Rajesh Kumar

forwarded by the DIT, Kolkata, which was based upon the search carried out upon some third entity. It is just a theoretical compilation of certain facts, which was never examined analytically by any authority because it is not disclosed by the ld. Assessing Officer, whether any addition was made in the hands of those entry providers/brokers and if made, then

D.C.I.T., CIRCLE-1, DIBRUGARH vs. SHEETAL BAMALWA, DIBRUGARH

In the result, all the appeals of the Revenue are dismissed and that of the Cross Objections of the assessees are allowed

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav, Vice-(Kz) & Shri Rajesh Kumar

forwarded by the DIT, Kolkata, which was based upon the search carried out upon some third entity. It is just a theoretical compilation of certain facts, which was never examined analytically by any authority because it is not disclosed by the ld. Assessing Officer, whether any addition was made in the hands of those entry providers/brokers and if made, then

D.C.I.T., CIRCLE-1, DIBRUGARH vs. PRAMOD KUMAR BAMALWA, DIBRUGARH

In the result, all the appeals of the Revenue are dismissed and that of the Cross Objections of the assessees are allowed

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav, Vice-(Kz) & Shri Rajesh Kumar

forwarded by the DIT, Kolkata, which was based upon the search carried out upon some third entity. It is just a theoretical compilation of certain facts, which was never examined analytically by any authority because it is not disclosed by the ld. Assessing Officer, whether any addition was made in the hands of those entry providers/brokers and if made, then

D.C.I.T., CIRCLE-1, DIBRUGARH vs. VINOD BAMALWA, DIBRUGARH

In the result, all the appeals of the Revenue are dismissed and that of the Cross Objections of the assessees are allowed

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav, Vice-(Kz) & Shri Rajesh Kumar

forwarded by the DIT, Kolkata, which was based upon the search carried out upon some third entity. It is just a theoretical compilation of certain facts, which was never examined analytically by any authority because it is not disclosed by the ld. Assessing Officer, whether any addition was made in the hands of those entry providers/brokers and if made, then

SHRI KOMAL KUMBHAT,GUWAHATI vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-2(1), GUWAHATI

Bench: Shri Sanjay Gargi.T.A No.136/Gty/2020 Assessment Year: 2014-15 Shri Komal Kumbhat…………...................................................……Appellant 234, G.N.B Road, 2Nd Floor, Opposite Gauhati Club Bus Stand-Above Sarita Restaurant, Guwahati-781003. [Pan: Aedpk8036P] Vs. Ito, Ward-2(1), Guwahati...…...................……........……...…..…..Respondent Appearances By: Shri H. S. Kumbhat, Ar, Appeared On Behalf Of The Appellant. Shri N. T. Sherpa, Jcit-Dr, Appeared On Behalf Of The Respondent. Date Of Concluding The Hearing : March 14, 2023 Date Of Pronouncing The Order : May 25, 2023 आदेश / Order संजय गग", "या"यक सद"य "वारा / Per Sanjay Garg: The Present Appeal Has Been Preferred By The Assessee Against The Order Dated 02.03.2020 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax (Appeals)- Guwahati-1, Guwahati (Hereinafter Referred To As The ‘Cit(A)’) Passed U/S 250 Of The Income Tax Act (Hereinafter Referred To As The ‘Act’). 2. The Assessee In This Appeal Through Various Grounds Of Appeal Has Agitated Two Issues I.E. (I) Addition Made/Confirmed By The Lower Authorities On Long-Term Capital Gains Claimed By The Assessee Of Rs.21,80,417/- Treating The Same As Bogus & Thereby Adding The Same

transferred in the name of the assessee in the Books of Kappac Pharma Ltd. in the month of October 2012 (as claimed) and has been credited in the D-mat account of the assessee only in the month of February, 2014 i.e just one month before its sale in the month of March, 2014. Further that the payment against