SHRI ABDUL HAMID,TINSUKIA vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-3, TINSUKIA
In the result, both the appeals of the assessees( ITA No
ITA 46/GTY/2019[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Guwahati17 Jul 2020AY 2014-15
Bench: Shri A. T. Varkey, Jm &Dr. A.L.Saini, Am आयकरअपीलसं./Ita Nos.46 /Gau/2019 ("नधा"रणवष" / Assessment Year:2014-15)
For Appellant: Shri Sanjay Modi, FCAFor Respondent: Shri Rockcin Saikia, JCIT, Sr. DR
Section 115BSection 143(3)Section 263
9
Shri Abdul Hamid & Shri Abdul Hannan
ITA Nos.46 & 47/Gau/2019
Assessment Year:2014-15
(Bang)]. Therefore, so far this first ground is concerned, the ld PCIT was not right in exercising the jurisdiction under section 263 of the Act.
14. Next ground on which ld PCIT has exercised jurisdiction under section 263 of the Act was that