Search: section 68 | BharatTax

Search ITAT High Courts Supreme Court Phrases AI Research History

Filters

Sort by

Assessment Year

Order Date From

Order Date To

Judge Name

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

Search Judgments
Browse by Bench
Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

49 results for “section 68”+ Section 76clear

Sorted by relevance

Delhi2,964 Mumbai2,254 Bangalore784 Chennai649 Karnataka623 Ahmedabad604 Kolkata504 Jaipur440 Hyderabad417 Indore314 Surat290 Cochin281 Chandigarh272 Pune249 Visakhapatnam112 Raipur110 Rajkot94 Cuttack91 Telangana81 Lucknow75 Calcutta67 Amritsar57 Allahabad52 Guwahati49 Nagpur47 SC47 Jodhpur38 Ranchi28 Agra25 Dehradun22 Patna13 Rajasthan11 Varanasi8 Orissa7 Jabalpur4 Panaji4 Gauhati1 ASHOK BHAN DALVEER BHANDARI1 Kerala1 Andhra Pradesh1

Key Topics

Section 6864 Addition to Income33 Section 14830 Section 143(3)29 Section 25019 Section 153A18 Section 14710 Section 80l10 Disallowance10 Deduction

D.C.I.T., CIRCLE-1, DIBRUGARH vs. VINOD BAMALWA, DIBRUGARH

In the result, all the appeals of the Revenue are dismissed and that of the Cross Objections of the assessees are allowed

ITA 66/GTY/2023[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Guwahati01 Sept 2023AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav, Vice-(Kz) & Shri Rajesh Kumar

76,18,448/- (i.e., the impugned addition in each case) under section 68 of the Income Tax Act on account

D.C.I.T., CIRCLE-1, DIBRUGARH vs. MADAN LAL BAMALWA, DIBRUGARH

In the result, all the appeals of the Revenue are dismissed and that of the Cross Objections of the assessees are allowed

ITA 63/GTY/2023[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Guwahati01 Sept 2023AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav, Vice-(Kz) & Shri Rajesh Kumar

76,18,448/- (i.e., the impugned addition in each case) under section 68 of the Income Tax Act on account

Showing 1–20 of 49 · Page 1 of 3

10

Reopening of Assessment10

D.C.I.T., CIRCLE- 1, DIBRUGARH vs. VISHAL BAMALWA , DIBRUGARH

In the result, all the appeals of the Revenue are dismissed and that of the Cross Objections of the assessees are allowed

ITA 60/GTY/2023[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Guwahati01 Sept 2023AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav, Vice-(Kz) & Shri Rajesh Kumar

76,18,448/- (i.e., the impugned addition in each case) under section 68 of the Income Tax Act on account

D.C.I.T., CIRCLE-1, DIBRUGARH vs. SHEETAL BAMALWA, DIBRUGARH

In the result, all the appeals of the Revenue are dismissed and that of the Cross Objections of the assessees are allowed

ITA 64/GTY/2023[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Guwahati01 Sept 2023AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav, Vice-(Kz) & Shri Rajesh Kumar

76,18,448/- (i.e., the impugned addition in each case) under section 68 of the Income Tax Act on account

D.C.I.T., CIRCLE-1, DIBRUGARH vs. VINAY BAMALWA, DIBRUGARH

In the result, all the appeals of the Revenue are dismissed and that of the Cross Objections of the assessees are allowed

ITA 61/GTY/2023[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Guwahati01 Sept 2023AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav, Vice-(Kz) & Shri Rajesh Kumar

76,18,448/- (i.e., the impugned addition in each case) under section 68 of the Income Tax Act on account

D.C.I.T., CIRCLE- 1, DIBRUGARH vs. USHA BAMALWA, DIBRUGARH

In the result, all the appeals of the Revenue are dismissed and that of the Cross Objections of the assessees are allowed

ITA 57/GTY/2023[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Guwahati01 Sept 2023AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav, Vice-(Kz) & Shri Rajesh Kumar

76,18,448/- (i.e., the impugned addition in each case) under section 68 of the Income Tax Act on account

DCIT, CIRCLE-1, DIBRUGARH vs. BAJRANG LAL BAMALWA, DIBRUGARH

In the result, all the appeals of the Revenue are dismissed and that of the Cross Objections of the assessees are allowed

ITA 51/GTY/2023[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Guwahati01 Sept 2023AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav, Vice-(Kz) & Shri Rajesh Kumar

76,18,448/- (i.e., the impugned addition in each case) under section 68 of the Income Tax Act on account

D.C.I.T., CIRCLE- 1, DIBRUGARH vs. HANS RAJ BAMALWA (HUF), DIBRUGARH

In the result, all the appeals of the Revenue are dismissed and that of the Cross Objections of the assessees are allowed

ITA 56/GTY/2023[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Guwahati01 Sept 2023AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav, Vice-(Kz) & Shri Rajesh Kumar

76,18,448/- (i.e., the impugned addition in each case) under section 68 of the Income Tax Act on account

DCIT, CIRCLE-1, DIBRUGARH vs. BAJRANG LAL BAMALWA, DIBRUGARH

In the result, all the appeals of the Revenue are dismissed and that of the Cross Objections of the assessees are allowed

ITA 52/GTY/2023[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Guwahati01 Sept 2023AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav, Vice-(Kz) & Shri Rajesh Kumar

76,18,448/- (i.e., the impugned addition in each case) under section 68 of the Income Tax Act on account

D.C.I.T., CIRCLE- 1, DIBRUGARH vs. MEENAKSHI BAMALWA SONI, DIBRUGARH

In the result, all the appeals of the Revenue are dismissed and that of the Cross Objections of the assessees are allowed

ITA 58/GTY/2023[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Guwahati01 Sept 2023AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav, Vice-(Kz) & Shri Rajesh Kumar

76,18,448/- (i.e., the impugned addition in each case) under section 68 of the Income Tax Act on account

D.C.I.T., CIRCLE-1, DIBRUGARH vs. BACHH RAJ BAMALWA, DIBRUGARH

In the result, all the appeals of the Revenue are dismissed and that of the Cross Objections of the assessees are allowed

ITA 53/GTY/2023[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Guwahati01 Sept 2023AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav, Vice-(Kz) & Shri Rajesh Kumar

76,18,448/- (i.e., the impugned addition in each case) under section 68 of the Income Tax Act on account

D.C.I.T., CIRCLE-1, DIBRUGARH vs. PRAMOD KUMAR BAMALWA, DIBRUGARH

In the result, all the appeals of the Revenue are dismissed and that of the Cross Objections of the assessees are allowed

ITA 65/GTY/2023[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Guwahati01 Sept 2023AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav, Vice-(Kz) & Shri Rajesh Kumar

76,18,448/- (i.e., the impugned addition in each case) under section 68 of the Income Tax Act on account

D.C.I.T., CIRCLE-1, DIBRUGARH vs. BACHH RAJ BAMALWA, DIBRUGARH

In the result, all the appeals of the Revenue are dismissed and that of the Cross Objections of the assessees are allowed

ITA 54/GTY/2023[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Guwahati01 Sept 2023AY 2015-16

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav, Vice-(Kz) & Shri Rajesh Kumar

76,18,448/- (i.e., the impugned addition in each case) under section 68 of the Income Tax Act on account

D.C.I.T., CIRCLE- 1, DIBRUGARH vs. BHAGWATI DEVII BAMALWA , DIBRUGARH

In the result, all the appeals of the Revenue are dismissed and that of the Cross Objections of the assessees are allowed

ITA 59/GTY/2023[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Guwahati01 Sept 2023AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav, Vice-(Kz) & Shri Rajesh Kumar

76,18,448/- (i.e., the impugned addition in each case) under section 68 of the Income Tax Act on account

D.C.I.T., CIRCLE- 1, DIBRUGARH vs. HANS RAJ BAMALWA, DIBRUGARH

In the result, all the appeals of the Revenue are dismissed and that of the Cross Objections of the assessees are allowed

ITA 55/GTY/2023[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Guwahati01 Sept 2023AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav, Vice-(Kz) & Shri Rajesh Kumar

76,18,448/- (i.e., the impugned addition in each case) under section 68 of the Income Tax Act on account

D.C.I.T., CIRCLE-1, DIBRUGARH vs. RAVI BAMALWA, DIBRUGARH

In the result, all the appeals of the Revenue are dismissed and that of the Cross Objections of the assessees are allowed

ITA 62/GTY/2023[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Guwahati01 Sept 2023AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav, Vice-(Kz) & Shri Rajesh Kumar

76,18,448/- (i.e., the impugned addition in each case) under section 68 of the Income Tax Act on account

MS. ALLIED TRADE LINKS,GUWAHATI vs. ACIT CIR-2, GUWAHATI, GUWAHATI

In the result the appeal is allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 150/GTY/2023[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Guwahati11 Jun 2025AY 2017-18

Bench: Shri Manomohan Das & Shri Rakesh Mishra

Section 143(3)Section 250Section 69A

section 69A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 as unexplained money. The same may kindly be deleted. 2. That the appellant craves leave to submit any other ground/s on or before the hearing.” 3. Brief facts of the case are that the return showing total income at Rs.67,63,330/- was filed on 24.10.2017, which was taken up under

ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-1, DIBRUGARH, DIBRUGARH vs. SANTOSH BAMALWA, DIBRUGARH

In the result, appeal of the revenue is dismissed and the cross- objection filed by the assessee is allowed

ITA 104/GTY/2023[2012-13]Status: HeardITAT Guwahati13 Dec 2023AY 2012-13

Bench: Dr. Manish Borad, Hon’Ble & Shri Sonjoy Sarma, Hon’Blei.T.A. No. 104/Gty/2023 Assessment Year: 2012-13 Assistant Commissioner Of Income Smt. Santosh Bamalwa Tax, Circle-1, Dibrugarh Vs Ground Floor Mahalaya Road C/O A.K. Varma Dibrugarh - 786001 [Pan: Aedpb9900P] अपीलाथ"/ (Appellant) "" यथ"/ (Respondent) C.O. No. 34/Gty/2023 Assessment Year: 2012-13 Smt. Santosh Bamalwa Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax, Circle-1, Dibrugarh Vs Ground Floor Mahalaya Road C/O A.K. Varma Dibrugarh - 786001 [Pan: Aedpb9900P] अपीलाथ"/ (Appellant) "" यथ"/ (Respondent) Assessee By : Shri S.K. Tulsiyan, Advocate Revenue By : Shri Arun Bhowmick, Jcit, D/R सुनवाई क" तारीख/Date Of Hearing : 01/11/2023 घोषणा क" तारीख /Date Of Pronouncement: 13/12/2023 आदेश/O R D E R Per Dr. Manish Borad: The Present Appeal Filed By The Revenue & The Cross-Objection Filed By The Assessee Are Directed Against The Order Of The Learned Commissioner Of Income Tax (Appeals), Central, North-East Region, Guwahati (Hereinafter The “Ld. Cit(A)”) Dt. 14/07/2023, Passed U/S

For Appellant: Shri S.K. Tulsiyan, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri Arun Bhowmick, JCIT, D/R

Section 132Section 143(2)Section 153ASection 68

76,18,448/- under section 68 of the Income Tax Act on account of unexplained cash credits received. 3. Whether

DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE - 3, GUWAHATI vs. M/S. SMS SMELTERS LIMITED, NAHARLAGUN

Appeals are allowed in view of our foregoing detailed discussions

ITA 91/GTY/2017[2006-07]Status: DisposedITAT Guwahati06 Sept 2019AY 2006-07

Bench: Shri S.S.Godara & Dr. A.L. Saini

Section 143(3)Section 147Section 68Section 80l

76 and 77/Gau/2017 for assessment year(s) 2006-07, 2007-08, 2012-13 & 2013-14; respectively in first assessee’s case. 4. Coming to assessment year 2006-07, we find that CIT(A) has deleted sec. 68 addition of share capital amounting to ₹1,02,50,000/- made by Assessing Officer vide following detailed discussion:- “5.1 The appellant, apart from

M/S. SMS SMELTERS LIMITED,NAHARLAGUN vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE - 3, GUWAHATI

Appeals are allowed in view of our foregoing detailed discussions

ITA 93/GTY/2017[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Guwahati06 Sept 2019AY 2009-10

Bench: Shri S.S.Godara & Dr. A.L. Saini

Section 143(3)Section 147Section 68Section 80l

76 and 77/Gau/2017 for assessment year(s) 2006-07, 2007-08, 2012-13 & 2013-14; respectively in first assessee’s case. 4. Coming to assessment year 2006-07, we find that CIT(A) has deleted sec. 68 addition of share capital amounting to ₹1,02,50,000/- made by Assessing Officer vide following detailed discussion:- “5.1 The appellant, apart from