D.C.I.T., CIRCLE- 1, DIBRUGARH vs. BHAGWATI DEVII BAMALWA , DIBRUGARH

In the result, all the appeals of the Revenue are dismissed and that of the Cross Objections of the assessees are allowed

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav, Vice-(Kz) & Shri Rajesh Kumar

section 153A has also compiled in table, which reads as under:- S.N PARTICULARS AY NAME OF THE SCRIP QUANTUM OF PAPER O IN WHICH LTCG EXEMPTION BOOK CLAIMED CLAIMED U/S REFER 10(38) – ENCE ADDITION U/S 68 1 BAJRANG LAL 2012-13 Twenty First Century 4,76,18,448 PB-1 BAMALWA India Ltd. 2 BAJRANG

D.C.I.T., CIRCLE- 1, DIBRUGARH vs. VISHAL BAMALWA , DIBRUGARH

In the result, all the appeals of the Revenue are dismissed and that of the Cross Objections of the assessees are allowed

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav, Vice-(Kz) & Shri Rajesh Kumar

section 153A has also compiled in table, which reads as under:- S.N PARTICULARS AY NAME OF THE SCRIP QUANTUM OF PAPER O IN WHICH LTCG EXEMPTION BOOK CLAIMED CLAIMED U/S REFER 10(38) – ENCE ADDITION U/S 68 1 BAJRANG LAL 2012-13 Twenty First Century 4,76,18,448 PB-1 BAMALWA India Ltd. 2 BAJRANG

D.C.I.T., CIRCLE- 1, DIBRUGARH vs. MEENAKSHI BAMALWA SONI, DIBRUGARH

In the result, all the appeals of the Revenue are dismissed and that of the Cross Objections of the assessees are allowed

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav, Vice-(Kz) & Shri Rajesh Kumar

section 153A has also compiled in table, which reads as under:- S.N PARTICULARS AY NAME OF THE SCRIP QUANTUM OF PAPER O IN WHICH LTCG EXEMPTION BOOK CLAIMED CLAIMED U/S REFER 10(38) – ENCE ADDITION U/S 68 1 BAJRANG LAL 2012-13 Twenty First Century 4,76,18,448 PB-1 BAMALWA India Ltd. 2 BAJRANG

D.C.I.T., CIRCLE-1, DIBRUGARH vs. PRAMOD KUMAR BAMALWA, DIBRUGARH

In the result, all the appeals of the Revenue are dismissed and that of the Cross Objections of the assessees are allowed

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav, Vice-(Kz) & Shri Rajesh Kumar

section 153A has also compiled in table, which reads as under:- S.N PARTICULARS AY NAME OF THE SCRIP QUANTUM OF PAPER O IN WHICH LTCG EXEMPTION BOOK CLAIMED CLAIMED U/S REFER 10(38) – ENCE ADDITION U/S 68 1 BAJRANG LAL 2012-13 Twenty First Century 4,76,18,448 PB-1 BAMALWA India Ltd. 2 BAJRANG

D.C.I.T., CIRCLE- 1, DIBRUGARH vs. HANS RAJ BAMALWA (HUF), DIBRUGARH

In the result, all the appeals of the Revenue are dismissed and that of the Cross Objections of the assessees are allowed

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav, Vice-(Kz) & Shri Rajesh Kumar

section 153A has also compiled in table, which reads as under:- S.N PARTICULARS AY NAME OF THE SCRIP QUANTUM OF PAPER O IN WHICH LTCG EXEMPTION BOOK CLAIMED CLAIMED U/S REFER 10(38) – ENCE ADDITION U/S 68 1 BAJRANG LAL 2012-13 Twenty First Century 4,76,18,448 PB-1 BAMALWA India Ltd. 2 BAJRANG

D.C.I.T., CIRCLE- 1, DIBRUGARH vs. HANS RAJ BAMALWA, DIBRUGARH

In the result, all the appeals of the Revenue are dismissed and that of the Cross Objections of the assessees are allowed

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav, Vice-(Kz) & Shri Rajesh Kumar

section 153A has also compiled in table, which reads as under:- S.N PARTICULARS AY NAME OF THE SCRIP QUANTUM OF PAPER O IN WHICH LTCG EXEMPTION BOOK CLAIMED CLAIMED U/S REFER 10(38) – ENCE ADDITION U/S 68 1 BAJRANG LAL 2012-13 Twenty First Century 4,76,18,448 PB-1 BAMALWA India Ltd. 2 BAJRANG

DCIT, CIRCLE-1, DIBRUGARH vs. BAJRANG LAL BAMALWA, DIBRUGARH

In the result, all the appeals of the Revenue are dismissed and that of the Cross Objections of the assessees are allowed

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav, Vice-(Kz) & Shri Rajesh Kumar

section 153A has also compiled in table, which reads as under:- S.N PARTICULARS AY NAME OF THE SCRIP QUANTUM OF PAPER O IN WHICH LTCG EXEMPTION BOOK CLAIMED CLAIMED U/S REFER 10(38) – ENCE ADDITION U/S 68 1 BAJRANG LAL 2012-13 Twenty First Century 4,76,18,448 PB-1 BAMALWA India Ltd. 2 BAJRANG

DCIT, CIRCLE-1, DIBRUGARH vs. BAJRANG LAL BAMALWA, DIBRUGARH

In the result, all the appeals of the Revenue are dismissed and that of the Cross Objections of the assessees are allowed

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav, Vice-(Kz) & Shri Rajesh Kumar

section 153A has also compiled in table, which reads as under:- S.N PARTICULARS AY NAME OF THE SCRIP QUANTUM OF PAPER O IN WHICH LTCG EXEMPTION BOOK CLAIMED CLAIMED U/S REFER 10(38) – ENCE ADDITION U/S 68 1 BAJRANG LAL 2012-13 Twenty First Century 4,76,18,448 PB-1 BAMALWA India Ltd. 2 BAJRANG

D.C.I.T., CIRCLE-1, DIBRUGARH vs. BACHH RAJ BAMALWA, DIBRUGARH

In the result, all the appeals of the Revenue are dismissed and that of the Cross Objections of the assessees are allowed

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav, Vice-(Kz) & Shri Rajesh Kumar

section 153A has also compiled in table, which reads as under:- S.N PARTICULARS AY NAME OF THE SCRIP QUANTUM OF PAPER O IN WHICH LTCG EXEMPTION BOOK CLAIMED CLAIMED U/S REFER 10(38) – ENCE ADDITION U/S 68 1 BAJRANG LAL 2012-13 Twenty First Century 4,76,18,448 PB-1 BAMALWA India Ltd. 2 BAJRANG

D.C.I.T., CIRCLE-1, DIBRUGARH vs. VINAY BAMALWA, DIBRUGARH

In the result, all the appeals of the Revenue are dismissed and that of the Cross Objections of the assessees are allowed

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav, Vice-(Kz) & Shri Rajesh Kumar

section 153A has also compiled in table, which reads as under:- S.N PARTICULARS AY NAME OF THE SCRIP QUANTUM OF PAPER O IN WHICH LTCG EXEMPTION BOOK CLAIMED CLAIMED U/S REFER 10(38) – ENCE ADDITION U/S 68 1 BAJRANG LAL 2012-13 Twenty First Century 4,76,18,448 PB-1 BAMALWA India Ltd. 2 BAJRANG

D.C.I.T., CIRCLE- 1, DIBRUGARH vs. USHA BAMALWA, DIBRUGARH

In the result, all the appeals of the Revenue are dismissed and that of the Cross Objections of the assessees are allowed

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav, Vice-(Kz) & Shri Rajesh Kumar

section 153A has also compiled in table, which reads as under:- S.N PARTICULARS AY NAME OF THE SCRIP QUANTUM OF PAPER O IN WHICH LTCG EXEMPTION BOOK CLAIMED CLAIMED U/S REFER 10(38) – ENCE ADDITION U/S 68 1 BAJRANG LAL 2012-13 Twenty First Century 4,76,18,448 PB-1 BAMALWA India Ltd. 2 BAJRANG

D.C.I.T., CIRCLE-1, DIBRUGARH vs. SHEETAL BAMALWA, DIBRUGARH

In the result, all the appeals of the Revenue are dismissed and that of the Cross Objections of the assessees are allowed

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav, Vice-(Kz) & Shri Rajesh Kumar

section 153A has also compiled in table, which reads as under:- S.N PARTICULARS AY NAME OF THE SCRIP QUANTUM OF PAPER O IN WHICH LTCG EXEMPTION BOOK CLAIMED CLAIMED U/S REFER 10(38) – ENCE ADDITION U/S 68 1 BAJRANG LAL 2012-13 Twenty First Century 4,76,18,448 PB-1 BAMALWA India Ltd. 2 BAJRANG

D.C.I.T., CIRCLE-1, DIBRUGARH vs. MADAN LAL BAMALWA, DIBRUGARH

In the result, all the appeals of the Revenue are dismissed and that of the Cross Objections of the assessees are allowed

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav, Vice-(Kz) & Shri Rajesh Kumar

section 153A has also compiled in table, which reads as under:- S.N PARTICULARS AY NAME OF THE SCRIP QUANTUM OF PAPER O IN WHICH LTCG EXEMPTION BOOK CLAIMED CLAIMED U/S REFER 10(38) – ENCE ADDITION U/S 68 1 BAJRANG LAL 2012-13 Twenty First Century 4,76,18,448 PB-1 BAMALWA India Ltd. 2 BAJRANG

D.C.I.T., CIRCLE-1, DIBRUGARH vs. RAVI BAMALWA, DIBRUGARH

In the result, all the appeals of the Revenue are dismissed and that of the Cross Objections of the assessees are allowed

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav, Vice-(Kz) & Shri Rajesh Kumar

section 153A has also compiled in table, which reads as under:- S.N PARTICULARS AY NAME OF THE SCRIP QUANTUM OF PAPER O IN WHICH LTCG EXEMPTION BOOK CLAIMED CLAIMED U/S REFER 10(38) – ENCE ADDITION U/S 68 1 BAJRANG LAL 2012-13 Twenty First Century 4,76,18,448 PB-1 BAMALWA India Ltd. 2 BAJRANG

AMIT KUMAR,DELHI vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD 1(1), GUWAHATI, INCOME TAX OFFICER

Bench: SHRI MANOMOHAN DAS, JUDICIAL MEMBER SHRI SANJAY AWASTHI (Accountant Member)

74,364/- being difference in sales as per books and figures reported in GST ignoring the reconciliation submitted with evidences on record. 6. On the facts and circumstances of the case, the Ld CIT(A) has erred in law in upholding the aggregate additions of Rs.2,02,30,39,718/- without complying with mandatory provisions

AMIT KUMAR,DELHI vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD 1(1), GUWAHATI, INCOME TAS OFFICER

Bench: SHRI MANOMOHAN DAS, JUDICIAL MEMBER SHRI SANJAY AWASTHI (Accountant Member)

74,364/- being difference in sales as per books and figures reported in GST ignoring the reconciliation submitted with evidences on record. 6. On the facts and circumstances of the case, the Ld CIT(A) has erred in law in upholding the aggregate additions of Rs.2,02,30,39,718/- without complying with mandatory provisions

S.M. LIME INDUSTRIES,GUWAHATI,ASSAM vs. DCIT/ACIT, CIR-1, GUWAHATI

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is partly allowed for statistical purposes

Bench: Dr.Manish Borad & Shri Manomohan Dasआयकर अपील सं. / Ita No.37/Gty/2024 िनधा"रण वष" / Assessment Year: 2018-19

section 68 of the Act, the alleged loan credits in respect of 11 of them are held as unexplained credits u/s.68 of the Act. 5. Now the assessee is in appeal before the Tribunal challenging the impugned order passed by ld.CIT(A). 6. Before us, referring to detailed paper book containing 222 pages, firstly ld. Counsel for the assessee

INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-ITANAGAR, NORTH LAKHIMPUR vs. M/S. KAMALA HYDRO ELECTRIC POWER COMPANY LIMITED, ITANAGAR

Bench: Shri S.S.Godara & Dr. A.L.Sainiassessment Year :2012-13

section 68 of the Income Tax Ac t, 1961. 5.0. The appellant is a Joint Venture Company between M/s Jindal Power Limited and Government of Arunachal Pradesh [i.e. Hydro Power Development Corporation of Arunachal Pradesh] which has been established to develop and operate Attunli Hydro Electric Power Project. The share capital of the appellant company has been subscribed