D.C.I.T., CIRCLE-1, DIBRUGARH vs. PRAMOD KUMAR BAMALWA, DIBRUGARH

In the result, all the appeals of the Revenue are dismissed and that of the Cross Objections of the assessees are allowed

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav, Vice-(Kz) & Shri Rajesh Kumar

section 153A has also compiled in table, which reads as under:- S.N PARTICULARS AY NAME OF THE SCRIP QUANTUM OF PAPER O IN WHICH LTCG EXEMPTION BOOK CLAIMED CLAIMED U/S REFER 10(38) – ENCE ADDITION U/S 68 1 BAJRANG LAL 2012-13 Twenty First Century 4,76,18,448 PB-1 BAMALWA India Ltd. 2 BAJRANG

D.C.I.T., CIRCLE-1, DIBRUGARH vs. VINOD BAMALWA, DIBRUGARH

In the result, all the appeals of the Revenue are dismissed and that of the Cross Objections of the assessees are allowed

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav, Vice-(Kz) & Shri Rajesh Kumar

section 153A has also compiled in table, which reads as under:- S.N PARTICULARS AY NAME OF THE SCRIP QUANTUM OF PAPER O IN WHICH LTCG EXEMPTION BOOK CLAIMED CLAIMED U/S REFER 10(38) – ENCE ADDITION U/S 68 1 BAJRANG LAL 2012-13 Twenty First Century 4,76,18,448 PB-1 BAMALWA India Ltd. 2 BAJRANG

D.C.I.T., CIRCLE-1, DIBRUGARH vs. MADAN LAL BAMALWA, DIBRUGARH

In the result, all the appeals of the Revenue are dismissed and that of the Cross Objections of the assessees are allowed

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav, Vice-(Kz) & Shri Rajesh Kumar

section 153A has also compiled in table, which reads as under:- S.N PARTICULARS AY NAME OF THE SCRIP QUANTUM OF PAPER O IN WHICH LTCG EXEMPTION BOOK CLAIMED CLAIMED U/S REFER 10(38) – ENCE ADDITION U/S 68 1 BAJRANG LAL 2012-13 Twenty First Century 4,76,18,448 PB-1 BAMALWA India Ltd. 2 BAJRANG

D.C.I.T., CIRCLE- 1, DIBRUGARH vs. BHAGWATI DEVII BAMALWA , DIBRUGARH

In the result, all the appeals of the Revenue are dismissed and that of the Cross Objections of the assessees are allowed

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav, Vice-(Kz) & Shri Rajesh Kumar

section 153A has also compiled in table, which reads as under:- S.N PARTICULARS AY NAME OF THE SCRIP QUANTUM OF PAPER O IN WHICH LTCG EXEMPTION BOOK CLAIMED CLAIMED U/S REFER 10(38) – ENCE ADDITION U/S 68 1 BAJRANG LAL 2012-13 Twenty First Century 4,76,18,448 PB-1 BAMALWA India Ltd. 2 BAJRANG

D.C.I.T., CIRCLE-1, DIBRUGARH vs. SHEETAL BAMALWA, DIBRUGARH

In the result, all the appeals of the Revenue are dismissed and that of the Cross Objections of the assessees are allowed

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav, Vice-(Kz) & Shri Rajesh Kumar

section 153A has also compiled in table, which reads as under:- S.N PARTICULARS AY NAME OF THE SCRIP QUANTUM OF PAPER O IN WHICH LTCG EXEMPTION BOOK CLAIMED CLAIMED U/S REFER 10(38) – ENCE ADDITION U/S 68 1 BAJRANG LAL 2012-13 Twenty First Century 4,76,18,448 PB-1 BAMALWA India Ltd. 2 BAJRANG

D.C.I.T., CIRCLE- 1, DIBRUGARH vs. VISHAL BAMALWA , DIBRUGARH

In the result, all the appeals of the Revenue are dismissed and that of the Cross Objections of the assessees are allowed

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav, Vice-(Kz) & Shri Rajesh Kumar

section 153A has also compiled in table, which reads as under:- S.N PARTICULARS AY NAME OF THE SCRIP QUANTUM OF PAPER O IN WHICH LTCG EXEMPTION BOOK CLAIMED CLAIMED U/S REFER 10(38) – ENCE ADDITION U/S 68 1 BAJRANG LAL 2012-13 Twenty First Century 4,76,18,448 PB-1 BAMALWA India Ltd. 2 BAJRANG

D.C.I.T., CIRCLE- 1, DIBRUGARH vs. MEENAKSHI BAMALWA SONI, DIBRUGARH

In the result, all the appeals of the Revenue are dismissed and that of the Cross Objections of the assessees are allowed

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav, Vice-(Kz) & Shri Rajesh Kumar

section 153A has also compiled in table, which reads as under:- S.N PARTICULARS AY NAME OF THE SCRIP QUANTUM OF PAPER O IN WHICH LTCG EXEMPTION BOOK CLAIMED CLAIMED U/S REFER 10(38) – ENCE ADDITION U/S 68 1 BAJRANG LAL 2012-13 Twenty First Century 4,76,18,448 PB-1 BAMALWA India Ltd. 2 BAJRANG

D.C.I.T., CIRCLE-1, DIBRUGARH vs. BACHH RAJ BAMALWA, DIBRUGARH

In the result, all the appeals of the Revenue are dismissed and that of the Cross Objections of the assessees are allowed

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav, Vice-(Kz) & Shri Rajesh Kumar

section 153A has also compiled in table, which reads as under:- S.N PARTICULARS AY NAME OF THE SCRIP QUANTUM OF PAPER O IN WHICH LTCG EXEMPTION BOOK CLAIMED CLAIMED U/S REFER 10(38) – ENCE ADDITION U/S 68 1 BAJRANG LAL 2012-13 Twenty First Century 4,76,18,448 PB-1 BAMALWA India Ltd. 2 BAJRANG

D.C.I.T., CIRCLE-1, DIBRUGARH vs. BACHH RAJ BAMALWA, DIBRUGARH

In the result, all the appeals of the Revenue are dismissed and that of the Cross Objections of the assessees are allowed

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav, Vice-(Kz) & Shri Rajesh Kumar

section 153A has also compiled in table, which reads as under:- S.N PARTICULARS AY NAME OF THE SCRIP QUANTUM OF PAPER O IN WHICH LTCG EXEMPTION BOOK CLAIMED CLAIMED U/S REFER 10(38) – ENCE ADDITION U/S 68 1 BAJRANG LAL 2012-13 Twenty First Century 4,76,18,448 PB-1 BAMALWA India Ltd. 2 BAJRANG

DCIT, CIRCLE-1, DIBRUGARH vs. BAJRANG LAL BAMALWA, DIBRUGARH

In the result, all the appeals of the Revenue are dismissed and that of the Cross Objections of the assessees are allowed

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav, Vice-(Kz) & Shri Rajesh Kumar

section 153A has also compiled in table, which reads as under:- S.N PARTICULARS AY NAME OF THE SCRIP QUANTUM OF PAPER O IN WHICH LTCG EXEMPTION BOOK CLAIMED CLAIMED U/S REFER 10(38) – ENCE ADDITION U/S 68 1 BAJRANG LAL 2012-13 Twenty First Century 4,76,18,448 PB-1 BAMALWA India Ltd. 2 BAJRANG

D.C.I.T., CIRCLE- 1, DIBRUGARH vs. HANS RAJ BAMALWA, DIBRUGARH

In the result, all the appeals of the Revenue are dismissed and that of the Cross Objections of the assessees are allowed

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav, Vice-(Kz) & Shri Rajesh Kumar

section 153A has also compiled in table, which reads as under:- S.N PARTICULARS AY NAME OF THE SCRIP QUANTUM OF PAPER O IN WHICH LTCG EXEMPTION BOOK CLAIMED CLAIMED U/S REFER 10(38) – ENCE ADDITION U/S 68 1 BAJRANG LAL 2012-13 Twenty First Century 4,76,18,448 PB-1 BAMALWA India Ltd. 2 BAJRANG

D.C.I.T., CIRCLE-1, DIBRUGARH vs. VINAY BAMALWA, DIBRUGARH

In the result, all the appeals of the Revenue are dismissed and that of the Cross Objections of the assessees are allowed

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav, Vice-(Kz) & Shri Rajesh Kumar

section 153A has also compiled in table, which reads as under:- S.N PARTICULARS AY NAME OF THE SCRIP QUANTUM OF PAPER O IN WHICH LTCG EXEMPTION BOOK CLAIMED CLAIMED U/S REFER 10(38) – ENCE ADDITION U/S 68 1 BAJRANG LAL 2012-13 Twenty First Century 4,76,18,448 PB-1 BAMALWA India Ltd. 2 BAJRANG

D.C.I.T., CIRCLE- 1, DIBRUGARH vs. HANS RAJ BAMALWA (HUF), DIBRUGARH

In the result, all the appeals of the Revenue are dismissed and that of the Cross Objections of the assessees are allowed

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav, Vice-(Kz) & Shri Rajesh Kumar

section 153A has also compiled in table, which reads as under:- S.N PARTICULARS AY NAME OF THE SCRIP QUANTUM OF PAPER O IN WHICH LTCG EXEMPTION BOOK CLAIMED CLAIMED U/S REFER 10(38) – ENCE ADDITION U/S 68 1 BAJRANG LAL 2012-13 Twenty First Century 4,76,18,448 PB-1 BAMALWA India Ltd. 2 BAJRANG

DCIT, CIRCLE-1, DIBRUGARH vs. BAJRANG LAL BAMALWA, DIBRUGARH

In the result, all the appeals of the Revenue are dismissed and that of the Cross Objections of the assessees are allowed

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav, Vice-(Kz) & Shri Rajesh Kumar

section 153A has also compiled in table, which reads as under:- S.N PARTICULARS AY NAME OF THE SCRIP QUANTUM OF PAPER O IN WHICH LTCG EXEMPTION BOOK CLAIMED CLAIMED U/S REFER 10(38) – ENCE ADDITION U/S 68 1 BAJRANG LAL 2012-13 Twenty First Century 4,76,18,448 PB-1 BAMALWA India Ltd. 2 BAJRANG

AMIT KUMAR,DELHI vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD 1(1), GUWAHATI, INCOME TAS OFFICER

Bench: SHRI MANOMOHAN DAS, JUDICIAL MEMBER SHRI SANJAY AWASTHI (Accountant Member)

72 taxmann.com 289 (Guj)], the Hon'ble Gujarat High Court has observed that estimating a certain percentage of the bogus claim is against the principles of Sections 68 and 69C of the Act, and if the purchases are bogus, then it is not incumbent upon the Tribunal to restrict the disallowance only to certain percentage of such purchases

AMIT KUMAR,DELHI vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD 1(1), GUWAHATI, INCOME TAX OFFICER

Bench: SHRI MANOMOHAN DAS, JUDICIAL MEMBER SHRI SANJAY AWASTHI (Accountant Member)

72 taxmann.com 289 (Guj)], the Hon'ble Gujarat High Court has observed that estimating a certain percentage of the bogus claim is against the principles of Sections 68 and 69C of the Act, and if the purchases are bogus, then it is not incumbent upon the Tribunal to restrict the disallowance only to certain percentage of such purchases

AGRIM INFRAPROJECT PRIVATE LIMITED,GUWAHATI vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-3, GUWAHATI

In the result, this appeal of the assessee i

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav, Vice-(Kz) & Dr. Manish Borad

68,30,300 2. VISHNU KANT CHOKHANI KAILASH AUTO FINANCE LTD. 1,41,27,050 3. KAVITA CHOKHANI KAILASH AUTO FINANCE LTD. 1,67,82,500 4. KAMLA DEVI CHOKHANI KAILASH AUTO FINANCE LTD. 1,67,12,210 5. BRAHMADUTT CHOKHANI AND KAILASH AUTO FINANCE LTD. 1,66,75,000 SONS (HUF) 6. VISHNU CHOKHANI AND SONS KAILASH AUTO FINANCE

AGRIM INFRAPROJECT PRIVATE LIMITED,GUWAHATI vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-3, GUWAHATI

In the result, this appeal of the assessee i

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav, Vice-(Kz) & Dr. Manish Borad

68,30,300 2. VISHNU KANT CHOKHANI KAILASH AUTO FINANCE LTD. 1,41,27,050 3. KAVITA CHOKHANI KAILASH AUTO FINANCE LTD. 1,67,82,500 4. KAMLA DEVI CHOKHANI KAILASH AUTO FINANCE LTD. 1,67,12,210 5. BRAHMADUTT CHOKHANI AND KAILASH AUTO FINANCE LTD. 1,66,75,000 SONS (HUF) 6. VISHNU CHOKHANI AND SONS KAILASH AUTO FINANCE