INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD 3(3), GUWAHATI vs. PRAG RAJ SINGLA, GUWAHATI
In the result, the appeal filed by the Revenue is dismissed
ITA 160/GTY/2018[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Guwahati02 Aug 2019AY 2013-14
Bench: Shri A. T. Varkey, Jm &Dr. A.L.Saini, Am आयकरअपीलसं./Ita No.160/Gau/2018 ("नधा"रणवष" / Assessment Year:2013-14)
For Appellant: Shri Sandip Sengupta, JCIT DRFor Respondent: Shri B. L. Purohit FCA & Shri Subash Purohit, FCA
Section 133(6)Section 143(3)Section 68
68 is clear. The Legislature has laid down that in the absence of a satisfactory explanation, the unexplained cash credit may be charged
Prag Raj Singla
Assessment Year:2013-14
to income-tax as the income of the assessee of that previous year. In this case the legislative mandate is not in terms of the words ‘shall’ becharged to income