ACCRECENT WAY MARKETING (P) LTD.,GUWAHATI vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-3, GUWAHATI

Bench: Shri Manomohan Das & Shri Rakesh Mishra

6 DTR (SC) 308. In this case, the Hon'ble Supreme Court while rejecting the SLP filed by the Department challenging a Delhi High Court order in the matter of Section 68, has clearly expounded the following: "Can the amount of share money be regarded as undisclosed income under s. 68 of IT Act, 1961? We find no merit

INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD 3(3), GUWAHATI vs. PRAG RAJ SINGLA, GUWAHATI

In the result, the appeal filed by the Revenue is dismissed

Bench: Shri A. T. Varkey, Jm &Dr. A.L.Saini, Am आयकरअपीलसं./Ita No.160/Gau/2018 ("नधा"रणवष" / Assessment Year:2013-14)

B. L. Purohit FCA & Shri Subash Purohit, FCA सुनवाईक"तार"ख/ Date of Hearing : 15/05/2019 घोषणाक"तार"ख/Date of Pronouncement : 02/08/2019 आदेश / O R D E R Per Dr. A. L. Saini: The captioned appeal filed by the Revenue, pertaining to assessment year 2013-14, is directed against the order passed by the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeal

ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-1, GUWAHATI vs. M/S. LINKSTAR PROMOTERS (P) LTD, KOLKATA

In the result, both the appeals of the Revenue are dismissed

Bench: Dr. Manish Borad & Shri Sonjoy Sarma

68 of the Act during the course of original assessment proceedings. Subsequently re-assessment proceedings were initiated and reasons were recorded for reopening and the said reasons were only to examine the amount received by the assessee-company towards share capital and share premium. The ld. D.R. failed to rebut this fact that the issues, which have been thoroughly examined

ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-1, GUWAHATI vs. M/S. WINNER DEALTRADE (P) LTD.,, KOLKATA

In the result, both the appeals of the Revenue are dismissed

Bench: Dr. Manish Borad & Shri Sonjoy Sarma

68 of the Act during the course of original assessment proceedings. Subsequently re-assessment proceedings were initiated and reasons were recorded for reopening and the said reasons were only to examine the amount received by the assessee-company towards share capital and share premium. The ld. D.R. failed to rebut this fact that the issues, which have been thoroughly examined

DCIT, CIRCLE-1, DIBRUGARH vs. BAJRANG LAL BAMALWA, DIBRUGARH

In the result, all the appeals of the Revenue are dismissed and that of the Cross Objections of the assessees are allowed

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav, Vice-(Kz) & Shri Rajesh Kumar

68 1 BAJRANG LAL 2012-13 Twenty First Century 4,76,18,448 PB-1 BAMALWA India Ltd. 2 BAJRANG LAL 2013-14 Twenty First Century 3,79,39,430 PB-2 BAMALWA India Ltd. (Clubbed income of Minor Son RohitBamalwa) 3 BACHH RAJ 2012-13 Twenty First Century 9,52,37,280 PB-3 BAMALWA India Ltd. (Self

DCIT, CIRCLE-1, DIBRUGARH vs. BAJRANG LAL BAMALWA, DIBRUGARH

In the result, all the appeals of the Revenue are dismissed and that of the Cross Objections of the assessees are allowed

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav, Vice-(Kz) & Shri Rajesh Kumar

68 1 BAJRANG LAL 2012-13 Twenty First Century 4,76,18,448 PB-1 BAMALWA India Ltd. 2 BAJRANG LAL 2013-14 Twenty First Century 3,79,39,430 PB-2 BAMALWA India Ltd. (Clubbed income of Minor Son RohitBamalwa) 3 BACHH RAJ 2012-13 Twenty First Century 9,52,37,280 PB-3 BAMALWA India Ltd. (Self

D.C.I.T., CIRCLE-1, DIBRUGARH vs. VINOD BAMALWA, DIBRUGARH

In the result, all the appeals of the Revenue are dismissed and that of the Cross Objections of the assessees are allowed

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav, Vice-(Kz) & Shri Rajesh Kumar

68 1 BAJRANG LAL 2012-13 Twenty First Century 4,76,18,448 PB-1 BAMALWA India Ltd. 2 BAJRANG LAL 2013-14 Twenty First Century 3,79,39,430 PB-2 BAMALWA India Ltd. (Clubbed income of Minor Son RohitBamalwa) 3 BACHH RAJ 2012-13 Twenty First Century 9,52,37,280 PB-3 BAMALWA India Ltd. (Self

D.C.I.T., CIRCLE- 1, DIBRUGARH vs. HANS RAJ BAMALWA (HUF), DIBRUGARH

In the result, all the appeals of the Revenue are dismissed and that of the Cross Objections of the assessees are allowed

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav, Vice-(Kz) & Shri Rajesh Kumar

68 1 BAJRANG LAL 2012-13 Twenty First Century 4,76,18,448 PB-1 BAMALWA India Ltd. 2 BAJRANG LAL 2013-14 Twenty First Century 3,79,39,430 PB-2 BAMALWA India Ltd. (Clubbed income of Minor Son RohitBamalwa) 3 BACHH RAJ 2012-13 Twenty First Century 9,52,37,280 PB-3 BAMALWA India Ltd. (Self

D.C.I.T., CIRCLE-1, DIBRUGARH vs. PRAMOD KUMAR BAMALWA, DIBRUGARH

In the result, all the appeals of the Revenue are dismissed and that of the Cross Objections of the assessees are allowed

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav, Vice-(Kz) & Shri Rajesh Kumar

68 1 BAJRANG LAL 2012-13 Twenty First Century 4,76,18,448 PB-1 BAMALWA India Ltd. 2 BAJRANG LAL 2013-14 Twenty First Century 3,79,39,430 PB-2 BAMALWA India Ltd. (Clubbed income of Minor Son RohitBamalwa) 3 BACHH RAJ 2012-13 Twenty First Century 9,52,37,280 PB-3 BAMALWA India Ltd. (Self

D.C.I.T., CIRCLE- 1, DIBRUGARH vs. USHA BAMALWA, DIBRUGARH

In the result, all the appeals of the Revenue are dismissed and that of the Cross Objections of the assessees are allowed

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav, Vice-(Kz) & Shri Rajesh Kumar

68 1 BAJRANG LAL 2012-13 Twenty First Century 4,76,18,448 PB-1 BAMALWA India Ltd. 2 BAJRANG LAL 2013-14 Twenty First Century 3,79,39,430 PB-2 BAMALWA India Ltd. (Clubbed income of Minor Son RohitBamalwa) 3 BACHH RAJ 2012-13 Twenty First Century 9,52,37,280 PB-3 BAMALWA India Ltd. (Self

D.C.I.T., CIRCLE- 1, DIBRUGARH vs. MEENAKSHI BAMALWA SONI, DIBRUGARH

In the result, all the appeals of the Revenue are dismissed and that of the Cross Objections of the assessees are allowed

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav, Vice-(Kz) & Shri Rajesh Kumar

68 1 BAJRANG LAL 2012-13 Twenty First Century 4,76,18,448 PB-1 BAMALWA India Ltd. 2 BAJRANG LAL 2013-14 Twenty First Century 3,79,39,430 PB-2 BAMALWA India Ltd. (Clubbed income of Minor Son RohitBamalwa) 3 BACHH RAJ 2012-13 Twenty First Century 9,52,37,280 PB-3 BAMALWA India Ltd. (Self

D.C.I.T., CIRCLE- 1, DIBRUGARH vs. BHAGWATI DEVII BAMALWA , DIBRUGARH

In the result, all the appeals of the Revenue are dismissed and that of the Cross Objections of the assessees are allowed

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav, Vice-(Kz) & Shri Rajesh Kumar

68 1 BAJRANG LAL 2012-13 Twenty First Century 4,76,18,448 PB-1 BAMALWA India Ltd. 2 BAJRANG LAL 2013-14 Twenty First Century 3,79,39,430 PB-2 BAMALWA India Ltd. (Clubbed income of Minor Son RohitBamalwa) 3 BACHH RAJ 2012-13 Twenty First Century 9,52,37,280 PB-3 BAMALWA India Ltd. (Self

D.C.I.T., CIRCLE- 1, DIBRUGARH vs. VISHAL BAMALWA , DIBRUGARH

In the result, all the appeals of the Revenue are dismissed and that of the Cross Objections of the assessees are allowed

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav, Vice-(Kz) & Shri Rajesh Kumar

68 1 BAJRANG LAL 2012-13 Twenty First Century 4,76,18,448 PB-1 BAMALWA India Ltd. 2 BAJRANG LAL 2013-14 Twenty First Century 3,79,39,430 PB-2 BAMALWA India Ltd. (Clubbed income of Minor Son RohitBamalwa) 3 BACHH RAJ 2012-13 Twenty First Century 9,52,37,280 PB-3 BAMALWA India Ltd. (Self

D.C.I.T., CIRCLE- 1, DIBRUGARH vs. HANS RAJ BAMALWA, DIBRUGARH

In the result, all the appeals of the Revenue are dismissed and that of the Cross Objections of the assessees are allowed

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav, Vice-(Kz) & Shri Rajesh Kumar

68 1 BAJRANG LAL 2012-13 Twenty First Century 4,76,18,448 PB-1 BAMALWA India Ltd. 2 BAJRANG LAL 2013-14 Twenty First Century 3,79,39,430 PB-2 BAMALWA India Ltd. (Clubbed income of Minor Son RohitBamalwa) 3 BACHH RAJ 2012-13 Twenty First Century 9,52,37,280 PB-3 BAMALWA India Ltd. (Self

D.C.I.T., CIRCLE-1, DIBRUGARH vs. SHEETAL BAMALWA, DIBRUGARH

In the result, all the appeals of the Revenue are dismissed and that of the Cross Objections of the assessees are allowed

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav, Vice-(Kz) & Shri Rajesh Kumar

68 1 BAJRANG LAL 2012-13 Twenty First Century 4,76,18,448 PB-1 BAMALWA India Ltd. 2 BAJRANG LAL 2013-14 Twenty First Century 3,79,39,430 PB-2 BAMALWA India Ltd. (Clubbed income of Minor Son RohitBamalwa) 3 BACHH RAJ 2012-13 Twenty First Century 9,52,37,280 PB-3 BAMALWA India Ltd. (Self

D.C.I.T., CIRCLE-1, DIBRUGARH vs. MADAN LAL BAMALWA, DIBRUGARH

In the result, all the appeals of the Revenue are dismissed and that of the Cross Objections of the assessees are allowed

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav, Vice-(Kz) & Shri Rajesh Kumar

68 1 BAJRANG LAL 2012-13 Twenty First Century 4,76,18,448 PB-1 BAMALWA India Ltd. 2 BAJRANG LAL 2013-14 Twenty First Century 3,79,39,430 PB-2 BAMALWA India Ltd. (Clubbed income of Minor Son RohitBamalwa) 3 BACHH RAJ 2012-13 Twenty First Century 9,52,37,280 PB-3 BAMALWA India Ltd. (Self

D.C.I.T., CIRCLE-1, DIBRUGARH vs. BACHH RAJ BAMALWA, DIBRUGARH

In the result, all the appeals of the Revenue are dismissed and that of the Cross Objections of the assessees are allowed

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav, Vice-(Kz) & Shri Rajesh Kumar

68 1 BAJRANG LAL 2012-13 Twenty First Century 4,76,18,448 PB-1 BAMALWA India Ltd. 2 BAJRANG LAL 2013-14 Twenty First Century 3,79,39,430 PB-2 BAMALWA India Ltd. (Clubbed income of Minor Son RohitBamalwa) 3 BACHH RAJ 2012-13 Twenty First Century 9,52,37,280 PB-3 BAMALWA India Ltd. (Self

D.C.I.T., CIRCLE-1, DIBRUGARH vs. RAVI BAMALWA, DIBRUGARH

In the result, all the appeals of the Revenue are dismissed and that of the Cross Objections of the assessees are allowed

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav, Vice-(Kz) & Shri Rajesh Kumar

68 1 BAJRANG LAL 2012-13 Twenty First Century 4,76,18,448 PB-1 BAMALWA India Ltd. 2 BAJRANG LAL 2013-14 Twenty First Century 3,79,39,430 PB-2 BAMALWA India Ltd. (Clubbed income of Minor Son RohitBamalwa) 3 BACHH RAJ 2012-13 Twenty First Century 9,52,37,280 PB-3 BAMALWA India Ltd. (Self

D.C.I.T., CIRCLE-1, DIBRUGARH vs. VINAY BAMALWA, DIBRUGARH

In the result, all the appeals of the Revenue are dismissed and that of the Cross Objections of the assessees are allowed

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav, Vice-(Kz) & Shri Rajesh Kumar

68 1 BAJRANG LAL 2012-13 Twenty First Century 4,76,18,448 PB-1 BAMALWA India Ltd. 2 BAJRANG LAL 2013-14 Twenty First Century 3,79,39,430 PB-2 BAMALWA India Ltd. (Clubbed income of Minor Son RohitBamalwa) 3 BACHH RAJ 2012-13 Twenty First Century 9,52,37,280 PB-3 BAMALWA India Ltd. (Self