BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

34 results for “section 68”+ Section 46Aclear

Sorted by relevance

Delhi782Mumbai484Ahmedabad158Kolkata152Hyderabad132Chennai109Jaipur94Bangalore92Indore87Chandigarh59Pune57Surat57Raipur49Amritsar47Rajkot41Guwahati34Visakhapatnam32Allahabad25Cuttack25Lucknow24Nagpur19Agra16Patna10Dehradun8Ranchi8Jodhpur7Cochin6Jabalpur5Varanasi5Telangana3SC2Calcutta2Gauhati1Karnataka1

Key Topics

Addition to Income34Section 143(3)33Section 80I29Section 25020Section 6820Deduction20Section 14711Section 14810Section 153A10Section 80l

UNTESHWAR SINGH,MEGHALAYA vs. CENTRAL CIRCLE-2, GUWAHATI, AAYAKAR BHAWAN, CHRISTIANBASTI

In the result, all the three appeals filed by the Assessee are partly\nallowed for statistical purposes

ITA 375/GTY/2025[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Guwahati26 Feb 2026AY 2013-14
Section 127Section 142(1)Section 143(2)Section 148Section 250

Section 68 of the IT Act. Thus, the addition\nu/s 68 of Rs.3,50,00,000/- made in the assessment order is hereby\nconfirmed. Ground No. 1 is dismissed accordingly.\n7.3. Decision on Ground(s) of Appeal No(s). 2 :\nThe Appellant contended that estimation of income needs to based on\ncomparables in similar line of business. As discussed

DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE- 3, GUWAHATI vs. M/S. SATYAM ISPAT (NORTH EAST) LIMITED, BANDERDEWA

In the result, the appeals filed by the Revenue for AY 2011-

Showing 1–20 of 34 · Page 1 of 2

10
Reopening of Assessment10
Disallowance8
ITA 87/GTY/2017[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Guwahati03 Mar 2023AY 2012-13

Bench: Sri Rajpal Yadav(Kz) & Dr. Manish Borad

Section 132Section 133(6)Section 139Section 143(2)Section 153CSection 250Section 68Section 80I

68 of the Act by ld. CIT(A) for the following share capital and share premium received by the assessee during the AY 2011-12 & AY 2012-13: For AY 2011-12 Sl. No. Name Share Capital Share Premium 1 Gajanan Dealers Pvt. Ltd. 1.50 Cr 6 Cr 2 Rich Valley Traders Pvt. Ltd. 40 lakh 1.60 Cr 3 Sarovar

DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE- 3, GUWAHATI vs. M/S. SATYAM ISPAT (NORTH EAST) LIMITED, BANDERDEWA

In the result, the appeals filed by the Revenue for AY 2011-

ITA 86/GTY/2017[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Guwahati03 Mar 2023AY 2011-12

Bench: Sri Rajpal Yadav(Kz) & Dr. Manish Borad

Section 132Section 133(6)Section 139Section 143(2)Section 153CSection 250Section 68Section 80I

68 of the Act by ld. CIT(A) for the following share capital and share premium received by the assessee during the AY 2011-12 & AY 2012-13: For AY 2011-12 Sl. No. Name Share Capital Share Premium 1 Gajanan Dealers Pvt. Ltd. 1.50 Cr 6 Cr 2 Rich Valley Traders Pvt. Ltd. 40 lakh 1.60 Cr 3 Sarovar

SHYAMASHREE FINVEST (P) LTD,GUWAHATI vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD7(3), KOLKATA

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee in I

ITA 105/GTY/2020[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Guwahati16 Jan 2023AY 2014-15

Bench: Dr. Manish Borad & Sri Sonjoy Sarma

Section 124Section 143(2)Section 250Section 271Section 68

68 of the Act for unexplained cash credit. Mentioning wrong Section can be an inadvertent mistake at the end of ld. AO and thus, for adjudication purpose, we deem that the substantive addition was made for unexplained investment. Page 5 of 9 I.T.A. Nos.: 105 & 106/GTY/2020 Assessment Year: 2014-15 Shyamashree Finvest Pvt. Ltd. 10. Now, when the matter

SHYAMASHREE FINVEST (P) LTD,GUWAHATI vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD7(3), KOLKATA

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee in I

ITA 106/GTY/2020[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Guwahati16 Jan 2023AY 2014-15

Bench: Dr. Manish Borad & Sri Sonjoy Sarma

Section 124Section 143(2)Section 250Section 271Section 68

68 of the Act for unexplained cash credit. Mentioning wrong Section can be an inadvertent mistake at the end of ld. AO and thus, for adjudication purpose, we deem that the substantive addition was made for unexplained investment. Page 5 of 9 I.T.A. Nos.: 105 & 106/GTY/2020 Assessment Year: 2014-15 Shyamashree Finvest Pvt. Ltd. 10. Now, when the matter

UNTESWAR SINGH,NONGPOH vs. CENTRAL CIRCLE-2, GUWAHATI, GUWAHATI,

In the result, all the three appeals filed by the Assessee are partly allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 376/GTY/2025[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Guwahati26 Feb 2026AY 2017-18

Bench: Shri Sonjoy Sarma & Shri Rakesh Mishra

Section 127Section 142(1)Section 143(2)Section 148Section 250

Section 68 of the IT Act. Thus, the addition u/s 68 of Rs.3,50,00,000/- made in the assessment order is hereby confirmed. Ground No. 1 is dismissed accordingly. 7.3. Decision on Ground(s) of Appeal No(s). 2 : The Appellant contended that estimation of income needs to based on comparables in similar line of business. As discussed

UNTESWAR SINGH,MEGHALAYA vs. CENTRAL CIRCLE-2, GUWAHATI, ASSAM

In the result, all the three appeals filed by the Assessee are partly allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 377/GTY/2025[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Guwahati26 Feb 2026AY 2018-19

Bench: Shri Sonjoy Sarma & Shri Rakesh Mishra

Section 127Section 142(1)Section 143(2)Section 148Section 250

Section 68 of the IT Act. Thus, the addition u/s 68 of Rs.3,50,00,000/- made in the assessment order is hereby confirmed. Ground No. 1 is dismissed accordingly. 7.3. Decision on Ground(s) of Appeal No(s). 2 : The Appellant contended that estimation of income needs to based on comparables in similar line of business. As discussed

RANEE NARAH,GUWAHATI vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-3, GUWAHATI

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 84/GTY/2020[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Guwahati23 Apr 2025AY 2016-17

Bench: Shri Manomohan Das & Shri Rakesh Mishra

Section 143(3)Section 234ASection 234BSection 234CSection 250Section 68Section 69

46A of IT Rules in the facts of the case. 6. For that the learned Assessing Officer is not justified in charging the following interest u/s 234A Rs. 2395096 u/s 234B Rs. 9879771 u/s 234C Rs. 28531 7. For that, any other ground/grounds may kindly be allowed to be urged at the time of hearing” I.T.A. No.: 84/GTY/2020 Assessment Year

JUD CEMENT LIMITED,SHILLONG vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME, CIRCLE - SHILLONG , SHILLONG

Appeals are allowed in view of our foregoing detailed discussions

ITA 39/GTY/2017[2006-07]Status: DisposedITAT Guwahati06 Sept 2019AY 2006-07

Bench: Shri S.S.Godara & Dr. A.L. Saini

Section 143(3)Section 147Section 68Section 80l

68 addition of share capital amounting to ₹1,02,50,000/- made by Assessing Officer vide following detailed discussion:- “5.1 The appellant, apart from relying upon the facts, has raised a legal contention stating that the addition of Rs.1,02,50,000/- made on account of share capital was beyond the scope and ambit of section 147 of Income

M/S. SMS SMELTERS LIMITED,NAHARLAGUN vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE - 3, GUWAHATI

Appeals are allowed in view of our foregoing detailed discussions

ITA 95/GTY/2017[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Guwahati06 Sept 2019AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri S.S.Godara & Dr. A.L. Saini

Section 143(3)Section 147Section 68Section 80l

68 addition of share capital amounting to ₹1,02,50,000/- made by Assessing Officer vide following detailed discussion:- “5.1 The appellant, apart from relying upon the facts, has raised a legal contention stating that the addition of Rs.1,02,50,000/- made on account of share capital was beyond the scope and ambit of section 147 of Income

DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE - 3, GUWAHATI vs. M/S. SMS SMELTERS LIMITED, NAHARLAGUN

Appeals are allowed in view of our foregoing detailed discussions

ITA 76/GTY/2017[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Guwahati06 Sept 2019AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri S.S.Godara & Dr. A.L. Saini

Section 143(3)Section 147Section 68Section 80l

68 addition of share capital amounting to ₹1,02,50,000/- made by Assessing Officer vide following detailed discussion:- “5.1 The appellant, apart from relying upon the facts, has raised a legal contention stating that the addition of Rs.1,02,50,000/- made on account of share capital was beyond the scope and ambit of section 147 of Income

M/S. SMS SMELTERS LIMITED,NAHARLAGUN vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE - 3, GUWAHATI

Appeals are allowed in view of our foregoing detailed discussions

ITA 96/GTY/2017[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Guwahati06 Sept 2019AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri S.S.Godara & Dr. A.L. Saini

Section 143(3)Section 147Section 68Section 80l

68 addition of share capital amounting to ₹1,02,50,000/- made by Assessing Officer vide following detailed discussion:- “5.1 The appellant, apart from relying upon the facts, has raised a legal contention stating that the addition of Rs.1,02,50,000/- made on account of share capital was beyond the scope and ambit of section 147 of Income

DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE - 3, GUWAHATI vs. M/S. SMS SMELTERS LIMITED, NAHARLAGUN

Appeals are allowed in view of our foregoing detailed discussions

ITA 77/GTY/2017[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Guwahati06 Sept 2019AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri S.S.Godara & Dr. A.L. Saini

Section 143(3)Section 147Section 68Section 80l

68 addition of share capital amounting to ₹1,02,50,000/- made by Assessing Officer vide following detailed discussion:- “5.1 The appellant, apart from relying upon the facts, has raised a legal contention stating that the addition of Rs.1,02,50,000/- made on account of share capital was beyond the scope and ambit of section 147 of Income

JUD CEMENT LIMITED,SHILLONG vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME, CIRCLE - SHILLONG , SHILLONG

Appeals are allowed in view of our foregoing detailed discussions

ITA 40/GTY/2017[2008-09]Status: DisposedITAT Guwahati06 Sept 2019AY 2008-09

Bench: Shri S.S.Godara & Dr. A.L. Saini

Section 143(3)Section 147Section 68Section 80l

68 addition of share capital amounting to ₹1,02,50,000/- made by Assessing Officer vide following detailed discussion:- “5.1 The appellant, apart from relying upon the facts, has raised a legal contention stating that the addition of Rs.1,02,50,000/- made on account of share capital was beyond the scope and ambit of section 147 of Income

DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE - 3, GUWAHATI vs. M/S. SMS SMELTERS LIMITED, NAHARLAGUN

Appeals are allowed in view of our foregoing detailed discussions

ITA 69/GTY/2017[2007-08]Status: DisposedITAT Guwahati06 Sept 2019AY 2007-08

Bench: Shri S.S.Godara & Dr. A.L. Saini

Section 143(3)Section 147Section 68Section 80l

68 addition of share capital amounting to ₹1,02,50,000/- made by Assessing Officer vide following detailed discussion:- “5.1 The appellant, apart from relying upon the facts, has raised a legal contention stating that the addition of Rs.1,02,50,000/- made on account of share capital was beyond the scope and ambit of section 147 of Income

DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE - 3, GUWAHATI vs. M/S. SMS SMELTERS LIMITED, NAHARLAGUN

Appeals are allowed in view of our foregoing detailed discussions

ITA 91/GTY/2017[2006-07]Status: DisposedITAT Guwahati06 Sept 2019AY 2006-07

Bench: Shri S.S.Godara & Dr. A.L. Saini

Section 143(3)Section 147Section 68Section 80l

68 addition of share capital amounting to ₹1,02,50,000/- made by Assessing Officer vide following detailed discussion:- “5.1 The appellant, apart from relying upon the facts, has raised a legal contention stating that the addition of Rs.1,02,50,000/- made on account of share capital was beyond the scope and ambit of section 147 of Income

M/S. SMS SMELTERS LIMITED,NAHARLAGUN vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE - 3, GUWAHATI

Appeals are allowed in view of our foregoing detailed discussions

ITA 93/GTY/2017[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Guwahati06 Sept 2019AY 2009-10

Bench: Shri S.S.Godara & Dr. A.L. Saini

Section 143(3)Section 147Section 68Section 80l

68 addition of share capital amounting to ₹1,02,50,000/- made by Assessing Officer vide following detailed discussion:- “5.1 The appellant, apart from relying upon the facts, has raised a legal contention stating that the addition of Rs.1,02,50,000/- made on account of share capital was beyond the scope and ambit of section 147 of Income

M/S. SMS SMELTERS LIMITED,NAHARLAGUN vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE - 3, GUWAHATI

Appeals are allowed in view of our foregoing detailed discussions

ITA 94/GTY/2017[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Guwahati06 Sept 2019AY 2010-11

Bench: Shri S.S.Godara & Dr. A.L. Saini

Section 143(3)Section 147Section 68Section 80l

68 addition of share capital amounting to ₹1,02,50,000/- made by Assessing Officer vide following detailed discussion:- “5.1 The appellant, apart from relying upon the facts, has raised a legal contention stating that the addition of Rs.1,02,50,000/- made on account of share capital was beyond the scope and ambit of section 147 of Income

DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE- 3, GUWAHATI vs. M/S. SATYAM ISPAT (NORTH EAST) LIMITED, BANDERDEWA

Appeals are dismissed

ITA 83/GTY/2017[2006-07]Status: DisposedITAT Guwahati02 Aug 2019AY 2006-07

Bench: Shri S.S.Godara & Dr. A.L. Saini

Section 143(3)Section 153A

46A of the Income Tax Rules 1962 for admission of these documents as additional evidences: (i) Chart showing name and address of the shareholders/applicants, No. of shares applied for/allotted face value of shares, premium paid, mode of payment, PAN No., CIN Nos. of the applicant companies. (ii) Copies of the appellants statements with the following banks showing the receipt

DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE- 3, GUWAHATI vs. M/S. SATYAM ISPAT (NORTH EAST) LIMITED, BANDERDEWA

Appeals are dismissed

ITA 84/GTY/2017[2007-08]Status: DisposedITAT Guwahati02 Aug 2019AY 2007-08

Bench: Shri S.S.Godara & Dr. A.L. Saini

Section 143(3)Section 153A

46A of the Income Tax Rules 1962 for admission of these documents as additional evidences: (i) Chart showing name and address of the shareholders/applicants, No. of shares applied for/allotted face value of shares, premium paid, mode of payment, PAN No., CIN Nos. of the applicant companies. (ii) Copies of the appellants statements with the following banks showing the receipt