BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

57 results for “section 68”+ Section 45(5)clear

Sorted by relevance

Delhi4,012Mumbai3,253Bangalore1,140Chennai838Ahmedabad803Kolkata708Karnataka674Jaipur657Hyderabad654Indore370Pune357Chandigarh354Surat273Cochin230Raipur198Rajkot153Visakhapatnam146Cuttack101Telangana100Nagpur94Lucknow88Jabalpur66Amritsar63Calcutta62SC60Guwahati57Allahabad54Jodhpur45Agra36Ranchi34Patna29Varanasi17Dehradun15Rajasthan12Orissa9Kerala5Panaji5Uttarakhand3Andhra Pradesh1Punjab & Haryana1ASHOK BHAN DALVEER BHANDARI1

Key Topics

Section 6839Section 153C39Section 25038Addition to Income36Disallowance22Section 153A21Section 143(3)17Depreciation14Section 14712Section 36

ACCRECENT WAY MARKETING (P) LTD.,GUWAHATI vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-3, GUWAHATI

ITA 358/GTY/2018[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Guwahati09 Jun 2025AY 2010-11

Bench: Shri Manomohan Das & Shri Rakesh Mishra

Section 142(1)Section 143(1)Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 251Section 68

Section 68 in this case is highly irregular and against the provisions of law. The Assessment Order may therefore be struck down as illegal. Ground 3: For that the Learned CIT(A) has failed to appreciate the facts and circumstances of the claim for deduction raised before her in regard to liability of 5,11,68,800/- which

SHRI PRABHUDAYAL BERIWAL,JYOTINAGAR vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, DIBRUGARH

Showing 1–20 of 57 · Page 1 of 3

11
Unexplained Cash Credit11
Section 40A(3)9
ITA 93/GTY/2024[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Guwahati25 Jun 2025AY 2014-15

Bench: SHRI MANOMOHAN DAS, JUDICIAL MEMBER SHRI SANJAY AWASTHI (Accountant Member)

Section 148Section 234ASection 234BSection 234CSection 250Section 68Section 69A

5 of the impugned order. The Ld. CIT(A) has held that the assessee did not furnish sufficient evidence to escape the rigours of section 68 of the Act. 1.2 Further aggrieved, the assessee has filed the present appeal with the following grounds: “1. For that the Additional/Joint/Deputy/Assistant Commissioner of Income tax erred in law and fact

DCIT, CIRCLE-1, DIBRUGARH vs. BAJRANG LAL BAMALWA, DIBRUGARH

In the result, all the appeals of the Revenue are dismissed and that of the Cross Objections of the assessees are allowed

ITA 52/GTY/2023[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Guwahati01 Sept 2023AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav, Vice-(Kz) & Shri Rajesh Kumar

5 HANS RAJ 2012-13 Twenty First Century 4,05,02,867 PB-5 BAMALWA India Ltd. 6 HANS RAJ 2012-13 Twenty First Century 3,94,72,552 PB-6 BAMALWA India Ltd. (H.U.F) 7 USHA BAMALWA 2012-13 Twenty First Century 4,04,76,152 PB-7 India Ltd. 8 MEENAKSHI 2012-13 Twenty First Century

D.C.I.T., CIRCLE-1, DIBRUGARH vs. PRAMOD KUMAR BAMALWA, DIBRUGARH

In the result, all the appeals of the Revenue are dismissed and that of the Cross Objections of the assessees are allowed

ITA 65/GTY/2023[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Guwahati01 Sept 2023AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav, Vice-(Kz) & Shri Rajesh Kumar

5 HANS RAJ 2012-13 Twenty First Century 4,05,02,867 PB-5 BAMALWA India Ltd. 6 HANS RAJ 2012-13 Twenty First Century 3,94,72,552 PB-6 BAMALWA India Ltd. (H.U.F) 7 USHA BAMALWA 2012-13 Twenty First Century 4,04,76,152 PB-7 India Ltd. 8 MEENAKSHI 2012-13 Twenty First Century

D.C.I.T., CIRCLE- 1, DIBRUGARH vs. BHAGWATI DEVII BAMALWA , DIBRUGARH

In the result, all the appeals of the Revenue are dismissed and that of the Cross Objections of the assessees are allowed

ITA 59/GTY/2023[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Guwahati01 Sept 2023AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav, Vice-(Kz) & Shri Rajesh Kumar

5 HANS RAJ 2012-13 Twenty First Century 4,05,02,867 PB-5 BAMALWA India Ltd. 6 HANS RAJ 2012-13 Twenty First Century 3,94,72,552 PB-6 BAMALWA India Ltd. (H.U.F) 7 USHA BAMALWA 2012-13 Twenty First Century 4,04,76,152 PB-7 India Ltd. 8 MEENAKSHI 2012-13 Twenty First Century

D.C.I.T., CIRCLE- 1, DIBRUGARH vs. HANS RAJ BAMALWA, DIBRUGARH

In the result, all the appeals of the Revenue are dismissed and that of the Cross Objections of the assessees are allowed

ITA 55/GTY/2023[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Guwahati01 Sept 2023AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav, Vice-(Kz) & Shri Rajesh Kumar

5 HANS RAJ 2012-13 Twenty First Century 4,05,02,867 PB-5 BAMALWA India Ltd. 6 HANS RAJ 2012-13 Twenty First Century 3,94,72,552 PB-6 BAMALWA India Ltd. (H.U.F) 7 USHA BAMALWA 2012-13 Twenty First Century 4,04,76,152 PB-7 India Ltd. 8 MEENAKSHI 2012-13 Twenty First Century

D.C.I.T., CIRCLE- 1, DIBRUGARH vs. HANS RAJ BAMALWA (HUF), DIBRUGARH

In the result, all the appeals of the Revenue are dismissed and that of the Cross Objections of the assessees are allowed

ITA 56/GTY/2023[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Guwahati01 Sept 2023AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav, Vice-(Kz) & Shri Rajesh Kumar

5 HANS RAJ 2012-13 Twenty First Century 4,05,02,867 PB-5 BAMALWA India Ltd. 6 HANS RAJ 2012-13 Twenty First Century 3,94,72,552 PB-6 BAMALWA India Ltd. (H.U.F) 7 USHA BAMALWA 2012-13 Twenty First Century 4,04,76,152 PB-7 India Ltd. 8 MEENAKSHI 2012-13 Twenty First Century

D.C.I.T., CIRCLE- 1, DIBRUGARH vs. USHA BAMALWA, DIBRUGARH

In the result, all the appeals of the Revenue are dismissed and that of the Cross Objections of the assessees are allowed

ITA 57/GTY/2023[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Guwahati01 Sept 2023AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav, Vice-(Kz) & Shri Rajesh Kumar

5 HANS RAJ 2012-13 Twenty First Century 4,05,02,867 PB-5 BAMALWA India Ltd. 6 HANS RAJ 2012-13 Twenty First Century 3,94,72,552 PB-6 BAMALWA India Ltd. (H.U.F) 7 USHA BAMALWA 2012-13 Twenty First Century 4,04,76,152 PB-7 India Ltd. 8 MEENAKSHI 2012-13 Twenty First Century

DCIT, CIRCLE-1, DIBRUGARH vs. BAJRANG LAL BAMALWA, DIBRUGARH

In the result, all the appeals of the Revenue are dismissed and that of the Cross Objections of the assessees are allowed

ITA 51/GTY/2023[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Guwahati01 Sept 2023AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav, Vice-(Kz) & Shri Rajesh Kumar

5 HANS RAJ 2012-13 Twenty First Century 4,05,02,867 PB-5 BAMALWA India Ltd. 6 HANS RAJ 2012-13 Twenty First Century 3,94,72,552 PB-6 BAMALWA India Ltd. (H.U.F) 7 USHA BAMALWA 2012-13 Twenty First Century 4,04,76,152 PB-7 India Ltd. 8 MEENAKSHI 2012-13 Twenty First Century

D.C.I.T., CIRCLE-1, DIBRUGARH vs. BACHH RAJ BAMALWA, DIBRUGARH

In the result, all the appeals of the Revenue are dismissed and that of the Cross Objections of the assessees are allowed

ITA 54/GTY/2023[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Guwahati01 Sept 2023AY 2015-16

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav, Vice-(Kz) & Shri Rajesh Kumar

5 HANS RAJ 2012-13 Twenty First Century 4,05,02,867 PB-5 BAMALWA India Ltd. 6 HANS RAJ 2012-13 Twenty First Century 3,94,72,552 PB-6 BAMALWA India Ltd. (H.U.F) 7 USHA BAMALWA 2012-13 Twenty First Century 4,04,76,152 PB-7 India Ltd. 8 MEENAKSHI 2012-13 Twenty First Century

D.C.I.T., CIRCLE- 1, DIBRUGARH vs. VISHAL BAMALWA , DIBRUGARH

In the result, all the appeals of the Revenue are dismissed and that of the Cross Objections of the assessees are allowed

ITA 60/GTY/2023[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Guwahati01 Sept 2023AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav, Vice-(Kz) & Shri Rajesh Kumar

5 HANS RAJ 2012-13 Twenty First Century 4,05,02,867 PB-5 BAMALWA India Ltd. 6 HANS RAJ 2012-13 Twenty First Century 3,94,72,552 PB-6 BAMALWA India Ltd. (H.U.F) 7 USHA BAMALWA 2012-13 Twenty First Century 4,04,76,152 PB-7 India Ltd. 8 MEENAKSHI 2012-13 Twenty First Century

D.C.I.T., CIRCLE-1, DIBRUGARH vs. VINAY BAMALWA, DIBRUGARH

In the result, all the appeals of the Revenue are dismissed and that of the Cross Objections of the assessees are allowed

ITA 61/GTY/2023[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Guwahati01 Sept 2023AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav, Vice-(Kz) & Shri Rajesh Kumar

5 HANS RAJ 2012-13 Twenty First Century 4,05,02,867 PB-5 BAMALWA India Ltd. 6 HANS RAJ 2012-13 Twenty First Century 3,94,72,552 PB-6 BAMALWA India Ltd. (H.U.F) 7 USHA BAMALWA 2012-13 Twenty First Century 4,04,76,152 PB-7 India Ltd. 8 MEENAKSHI 2012-13 Twenty First Century

D.C.I.T., CIRCLE-1, DIBRUGARH vs. RAVI BAMALWA, DIBRUGARH

In the result, all the appeals of the Revenue are dismissed and that of the Cross Objections of the assessees are allowed

ITA 62/GTY/2023[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Guwahati01 Sept 2023AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav, Vice-(Kz) & Shri Rajesh Kumar

5 HANS RAJ 2012-13 Twenty First Century 4,05,02,867 PB-5 BAMALWA India Ltd. 6 HANS RAJ 2012-13 Twenty First Century 3,94,72,552 PB-6 BAMALWA India Ltd. (H.U.F) 7 USHA BAMALWA 2012-13 Twenty First Century 4,04,76,152 PB-7 India Ltd. 8 MEENAKSHI 2012-13 Twenty First Century

D.C.I.T., CIRCLE-1, DIBRUGARH vs. MADAN LAL BAMALWA, DIBRUGARH

In the result, all the appeals of the Revenue are dismissed and that of the Cross Objections of the assessees are allowed

ITA 63/GTY/2023[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Guwahati01 Sept 2023AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav, Vice-(Kz) & Shri Rajesh Kumar

5 HANS RAJ 2012-13 Twenty First Century 4,05,02,867 PB-5 BAMALWA India Ltd. 6 HANS RAJ 2012-13 Twenty First Century 3,94,72,552 PB-6 BAMALWA India Ltd. (H.U.F) 7 USHA BAMALWA 2012-13 Twenty First Century 4,04,76,152 PB-7 India Ltd. 8 MEENAKSHI 2012-13 Twenty First Century

D.C.I.T., CIRCLE-1, DIBRUGARH vs. SHEETAL BAMALWA, DIBRUGARH

In the result, all the appeals of the Revenue are dismissed and that of the Cross Objections of the assessees are allowed

ITA 64/GTY/2023[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Guwahati01 Sept 2023AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav, Vice-(Kz) & Shri Rajesh Kumar

5 HANS RAJ 2012-13 Twenty First Century 4,05,02,867 PB-5 BAMALWA India Ltd. 6 HANS RAJ 2012-13 Twenty First Century 3,94,72,552 PB-6 BAMALWA India Ltd. (H.U.F) 7 USHA BAMALWA 2012-13 Twenty First Century 4,04,76,152 PB-7 India Ltd. 8 MEENAKSHI 2012-13 Twenty First Century

D.C.I.T., CIRCLE-1, DIBRUGARH vs. BACHH RAJ BAMALWA, DIBRUGARH

In the result, all the appeals of the Revenue are dismissed and that of the Cross Objections of the assessees are allowed

ITA 53/GTY/2023[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Guwahati01 Sept 2023AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav, Vice-(Kz) & Shri Rajesh Kumar

5 HANS RAJ 2012-13 Twenty First Century 4,05,02,867 PB-5 BAMALWA India Ltd. 6 HANS RAJ 2012-13 Twenty First Century 3,94,72,552 PB-6 BAMALWA India Ltd. (H.U.F) 7 USHA BAMALWA 2012-13 Twenty First Century 4,04,76,152 PB-7 India Ltd. 8 MEENAKSHI 2012-13 Twenty First Century

D.C.I.T., CIRCLE-1, DIBRUGARH vs. VINOD BAMALWA, DIBRUGARH

In the result, all the appeals of the Revenue are dismissed and that of the Cross Objections of the assessees are allowed

ITA 66/GTY/2023[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Guwahati01 Sept 2023AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav, Vice-(Kz) & Shri Rajesh Kumar

5 HANS RAJ 2012-13 Twenty First Century 4,05,02,867 PB-5 BAMALWA India Ltd. 6 HANS RAJ 2012-13 Twenty First Century 3,94,72,552 PB-6 BAMALWA India Ltd. (H.U.F) 7 USHA BAMALWA 2012-13 Twenty First Century 4,04,76,152 PB-7 India Ltd. 8 MEENAKSHI 2012-13 Twenty First Century

D.C.I.T., CIRCLE- 1, DIBRUGARH vs. MEENAKSHI BAMALWA SONI, DIBRUGARH

In the result, all the appeals of the Revenue are dismissed and that of the Cross Objections of the assessees are allowed

ITA 58/GTY/2023[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Guwahati01 Sept 2023AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav, Vice-(Kz) & Shri Rajesh Kumar

5 HANS RAJ 2012-13 Twenty First Century 4,05,02,867 PB-5 BAMALWA India Ltd. 6 HANS RAJ 2012-13 Twenty First Century 3,94,72,552 PB-6 BAMALWA India Ltd. (H.U.F) 7 USHA BAMALWA 2012-13 Twenty First Century 4,04,76,152 PB-7 India Ltd. 8 MEENAKSHI 2012-13 Twenty First Century

DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE- 3, GUWAHATI vs. M/S. SATYAM ISPAT (NORTH EAST) LIMITED, BANDERDEWA

In the result, the appeals filed by the Revenue for AY 2011-

ITA 87/GTY/2017[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Guwahati03 Mar 2023AY 2012-13

Bench: Sri Rajpal Yadav(Kz) & Dr. Manish Borad

Section 132Section 133(6)Section 139Section 143(2)Section 153CSection 250Section 68Section 80I

68 of the Act for alleged bogus share capital and share premium observing as follows: “12.2. I have considered the submissions made before me by the appellant. I have also perused the assessment order and the remand report sent by the Assessing Officer. In his remand report the Assessing Officer has simply stated that the addition was made

DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE- 3, GUWAHATI vs. M/S. SATYAM ISPAT (NORTH EAST) LIMITED, BANDERDEWA

In the result, the appeals filed by the Revenue for AY 2011-

ITA 86/GTY/2017[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Guwahati03 Mar 2023AY 2011-12

Bench: Sri Rajpal Yadav(Kz) & Dr. Manish Borad

Section 132Section 133(6)Section 139Section 143(2)Section 153CSection 250Section 68Section 80I

68 of the Act for alleged bogus share capital and share premium observing as follows: “12.2. I have considered the submissions made before me by the appellant. I have also perused the assessment order and the remand report sent by the Assessing Officer. In his remand report the Assessing Officer has simply stated that the addition was made