BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

10 results for “section 68”+ Section 43Bclear

Sorted by relevance

Delhi471Mumbai445Kolkata203Ahmedabad134Chennai132Bangalore122Pune68Jaipur68Agra67Hyderabad56Raipur50Visakhapatnam40Cuttack31Lucknow29Cochin22Chandigarh21Indore17Surat16Nagpur11Rajkot10Guwahati10Jodhpur8Allahabad6Varanasi6Jabalpur5SC3Ranchi3Karnataka3Amritsar2Dehradun2Patna1

Key Topics

Section 143(1)59Section 15416Addition to Income10Rectification u/s 1548Section 143(3)4Section 2503Section 36(1)(va)3Section 403Section 43B2Section 153C

BETTER POWER SERVICES PVT. LTD.,GUWAHATI vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD - 1 (2), GUWAHATI

In the result, appeals of the assessees stand dismissed

ITA 60/GTY/2022[2020-21]Status: DisposedITAT Guwahati14 Jun 2023AY 2020-21

Bench: Shri Sanjay Garg & Shri Girish Agrawal

For Appellant: N o n eFor Respondent: Shri N. T. Sherpa, JCIT and Shri P. S
Section 143(1)Section 154

68,973/- since assessee had remitted the employees’ contribution to Provident Fund (PF) beyond the due date. Similar disallowance was made for AY 2020-21 amounting to Rs.10,84,170/-. Aggrieved, the assessee carried the matter before ld. CIT(A) but without any success. Assessee is aggrieved and is in appeal before the Tribunal. 6. On the aforesaid issue relating

PODDAR CAR WORLD (P) LTD.,,GUWAHATI vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-2, GUWAHATI

In the result, appeals of the assessees stand dismissed

2
Disallowance2
ITA 52/GTY/2022[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Guwahati14 Jun 2023AY 2018-19

Bench: Shri Sanjay Garg & Shri Girish Agrawal

For Appellant: N o n eFor Respondent: Shri N. T. Sherpa, JCIT and Shri P. S
Section 143(1)Section 154

68,973/- since assessee had remitted the employees’ contribution to Provident Fund (PF) beyond the due date. Similar disallowance was made for AY 2020-21 amounting to Rs.10,84,170/-. Aggrieved, the assessee carried the matter before ld. CIT(A) but without any success. Assessee is aggrieved and is in appeal before the Tribunal. 6. On the aforesaid issue relating

PODDAR CAR WORLD (P) LTD.,,GUWAHATI vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-2, GUWAHATI

In the result, appeals of the assessees stand dismissed

ITA 53/GTY/2022[2019-20]Status: DisposedITAT Guwahati14 Jun 2023AY 2019-20

Bench: Shri Sanjay Garg & Shri Girish Agrawal

For Appellant: N o n eFor Respondent: Shri N. T. Sherpa, JCIT and Shri P. S
Section 143(1)Section 154

68,973/- since assessee had remitted the employees’ contribution to Provident Fund (PF) beyond the due date. Similar disallowance was made for AY 2020-21 amounting to Rs.10,84,170/-. Aggrieved, the assessee carried the matter before ld. CIT(A) but without any success. Assessee is aggrieved and is in appeal before the Tribunal. 6. On the aforesaid issue relating

PODDAR CAR WORLD (P) LTD.,,GUWAHATI vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-2, GUWAHATI

In the result, appeals of the assessees stand dismissed

ITA 54/GTY/2022[2020-21]Status: DisposedITAT Guwahati14 Jun 2023AY 2020-21

Bench: Shri Sanjay Garg & Shri Girish Agrawal

For Appellant: N o n eFor Respondent: Shri N. T. Sherpa, JCIT and Shri P. S
Section 143(1)Section 154

68,973/- since assessee had remitted the employees’ contribution to Provident Fund (PF) beyond the due date. Similar disallowance was made for AY 2020-21 amounting to Rs.10,84,170/-. Aggrieved, the assessee carried the matter before ld. CIT(A) but without any success. Assessee is aggrieved and is in appeal before the Tribunal. 6. On the aforesaid issue relating

BALRAM SINGHI,GUWAHATI vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-1(1), GUWAHATI

In the result, appeals of the assessees stand dismissed

ITA 55/GTY/2022[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Guwahati14 Jun 2023AY 2018-19

Bench: Shri Sanjay Garg & Shri Girish Agrawal

For Appellant: N o n eFor Respondent: Shri N. T. Sherpa, JCIT and Shri P. S
Section 143(1)Section 154

68,973/- since assessee had remitted the employees’ contribution to Provident Fund (PF) beyond the due date. Similar disallowance was made for AY 2020-21 amounting to Rs.10,84,170/-. Aggrieved, the assessee carried the matter before ld. CIT(A) but without any success. Assessee is aggrieved and is in appeal before the Tribunal. 6. On the aforesaid issue relating

BALRAM SINGHI,GUWAHATI vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-1(1), GUWAHATI

In the result, appeals of the assessees stand dismissed

ITA 56/GTY/2022[2019-20]Status: DisposedITAT Guwahati14 Jun 2023AY 2019-20

Bench: Shri Sanjay Garg & Shri Girish Agrawal

For Appellant: N o n eFor Respondent: Shri N. T. Sherpa, JCIT and Shri P. S
Section 143(1)Section 154

68,973/- since assessee had remitted the employees’ contribution to Provident Fund (PF) beyond the due date. Similar disallowance was made for AY 2020-21 amounting to Rs.10,84,170/-. Aggrieved, the assessee carried the matter before ld. CIT(A) but without any success. Assessee is aggrieved and is in appeal before the Tribunal. 6. On the aforesaid issue relating

BALRAM SINGHI,GUWAHATI vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-1(1), GUWAHATI

In the result, appeals of the assessees stand dismissed

ITA 57/GTY/2022[2020-21]Status: DisposedITAT Guwahati14 Jun 2023AY 2020-21

Bench: Shri Sanjay Garg & Shri Girish Agrawal

For Appellant: N o n eFor Respondent: Shri N. T. Sherpa, JCIT and Shri P. S
Section 143(1)Section 154

68,973/- since assessee had remitted the employees’ contribution to Provident Fund (PF) beyond the due date. Similar disallowance was made for AY 2020-21 amounting to Rs.10,84,170/-. Aggrieved, the assessee carried the matter before ld. CIT(A) but without any success. Assessee is aggrieved and is in appeal before the Tribunal. 6. On the aforesaid issue relating

BETTER POWER SERVICES PVT. LTD.,GUWAHATI vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD - 1 (2), GUWAHATI

In the result, appeals of the assessees stand dismissed

ITA 59/GTY/2022[2019-20]Status: DisposedITAT Guwahati14 Jun 2023AY 2019-20

Bench: Shri Sanjay Garg & Shri Girish Agrawal

For Appellant: N o n eFor Respondent: Shri N. T. Sherpa, JCIT and Shri P. S
Section 143(1)Section 154

68,973/- since assessee had remitted the employees’ contribution to Provident Fund (PF) beyond the due date. Similar disallowance was made for AY 2020-21 amounting to Rs.10,84,170/-. Aggrieved, the assessee carried the matter before ld. CIT(A) but without any success. Assessee is aggrieved and is in appeal before the Tribunal. 6. On the aforesaid issue relating

ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE - 3, GUWAHATI vs. M/S. ANUPAM NIRMAN PVT. LTD., GUWAHATI

In the result, appeal of the revenue is dismissed

ITA 172/GTY/2018[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Guwahati22 Feb 2023AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav, Hon’Ble & Dr. Manish Borad, Hon’Blei.T.A. No. 172/Gty/2018 Assessment Year: 2012-13 Assistant Commissioner Of M/S. Anupam Nirman Private Income Tax, Circle-3, Guwahati Vs Limited 1St Floor, Kabita Mansion Rajgarh Link Road Chandmari Guwahati - 781003 [Pan : Aaica 4965 B] अपीलाथ"/ (Appellant) "" यथ"/ (Respondent) Assessee By : Shri Kishor Jain, Fca Revenue By : Shri N.T. Sherpa, Jcit सुनवाई क" तार"ख/Date Of Hearing : 20/12/2022 घोषणा क" तार"ख /Date Of Pronouncement: 22/02/2023 आदेश/O R D E R Per Dr. Manish Borad: The Present Appeal Is Directed At The Instance Of The Revenue Against The Order Of The Learned Commissioner Of Income Tax (Appeals) – Guwahati-2, Guwahati, (Hereinafter The “Ld. Cit(A)”) Dt. 27/03/2018, Passed U/S 250 Of The Income Tax Act, 1961 (“The Act’), For Assessment Year 2012-13. 2. The Revenue Has Raised The Following Grounds Of Appeal:- “(I) That On The Facts & Circumstances Of The Case As Well As On The Points Of Law, The Ld. Cit(A) Has Erred In Deleting The Addition Of Rs. 1,20,77,310/- On Account Estimation Of The Net Profit @ 7% Of Total Turnover For The Year. (Ii) That On The Facts & Circumstances Of The Case As Well As On The Points Of Law, The Ld. Cit(A) Erred In Deleting The Addition Of Rs. 49,05,724/- On Account Of Disallowance Towards Interest Expense Against Loan Under Section 40(A)(Ia) Of The Income Tax Act, 1961. (Iii) That On The Facts & Circumstances Of The Case As Well As On The Points Of Law, The Ld. Cit(A) Erred In Deleting The Addition Of Rs. 11,26,247/- On

For Appellant: Shri Kishor Jain, FCAFor Respondent: Shri N.T. Sherpa, JCIT
Section 132Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 153CSection 250Section 40Section 43B

43B of the Income Tax Act, 1961. (iv) That on the facts and circumstances of the case as well as on the points of law, the Ld. CIT(A) erred in quashing the assessment order for the year. (v) For these and such other grounds that may be urged at the time of hearings, the Hon'ble ITAT may please

M/S. GANESHBARI TEA CO. (P) LTD.,KOLKATA vs. ACIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE - 2, GUWAHATI

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is treated as partly allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 11/GTY/2023[2019-20]Status: DisposedITAT Guwahati20 Jun 2023AY 2019-20

Bench: Shri Sanjay Garg & Shri Girish Agrawali.T.A. No.11/Gty/2023 Assessment Year: 2019-20 Goneshbari Tea Company Pvt. Ltd. ………....….........…..........….…… Appellant 4/1, Middleton Street, Shakespear Sarani, Kolkata-700071. [Pan: Aabcg7880Q] Vs. Acit, Central Circle-2, Guwahati….………….…..…...…..…..…..... Respondent Appearances By: Shri Sumeet Kumar, Ar, Appeared On Behalf Of The Appellant. Shri Ps Thuingaleng, Acit-Dr, Appeared On Behalf Of The Respondent. Date Of Concluding The Hearing : June 06, 2023 Date Of Pronouncing The Order : June 20, 2023 आदेश / Order संजय गग", "या"यक सद"य "वारा / Per Sanjay Garg: The Present Appeal Has Been Preferred By The Assessee Against The Order Dated 31.10.2022 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax (Appeal), Guwahati [Hereinafter Referred To As ‘Cit(A)’] Passed U/S 250 Of The Income Tax Act (Hereinafter Referred To As The ‘Act’). 2. The Assessee In This Appeal Has Taken The Following Grounds Of Appeal: “1. That The Order Dated 31-10-2022 Passed By The Cit(A) U/S 250 Of The Act Is Bad In Law & Liable To Be Quashed.

Section 143(1)Section 143(3)Section 250Section 36(1)(va)Section 43B

68,446/- u/s 36(1)(va) of the Act on account of delay in deposit of PF/ ESI. 3. That on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the Learned CIT(Appeals) failed to appreciate that the PF/ ESI contributions were duly deposited before the due date of filing of income tax return for the impugned assessment year