DCIT, CIRCLE-1, DIBRUGARH vs. BAJRANG LAL BAMALWA, DIBRUGARH

In the result, all the appeals of the Revenue are dismissed and that of the Cross Objections of the assessees are allowed

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav, Vice-(Kz) & Shri Rajesh Kumar

section 153A has also compiled in table, which reads as under:- S.N PARTICULARS AY NAME OF THE SCRIP QUANTUM OF PAPER O IN WHICH LTCG EXEMPTION BOOK CLAIMED CLAIMED U/S REFER 10(38) – ENCE ADDITION U/S 68 1 BAJRANG LAL 2012-13 Twenty First Century 4,76,18,448 PB-1 BAMALWA India Ltd. 2 BAJRANG

D.C.I.T., CIRCLE- 1, DIBRUGARH vs. VISHAL BAMALWA , DIBRUGARH

In the result, all the appeals of the Revenue are dismissed and that of the Cross Objections of the assessees are allowed

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav, Vice-(Kz) & Shri Rajesh Kumar

section 153A has also compiled in table, which reads as under:- S.N PARTICULARS AY NAME OF THE SCRIP QUANTUM OF PAPER O IN WHICH LTCG EXEMPTION BOOK CLAIMED CLAIMED U/S REFER 10(38) – ENCE ADDITION U/S 68 1 BAJRANG LAL 2012-13 Twenty First Century 4,76,18,448 PB-1 BAMALWA India Ltd. 2 BAJRANG

D.C.I.T., CIRCLE- 1, DIBRUGARH vs. HANS RAJ BAMALWA (HUF), DIBRUGARH

In the result, all the appeals of the Revenue are dismissed and that of the Cross Objections of the assessees are allowed

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav, Vice-(Kz) & Shri Rajesh Kumar

section 153A has also compiled in table, which reads as under:- S.N PARTICULARS AY NAME OF THE SCRIP QUANTUM OF PAPER O IN WHICH LTCG EXEMPTION BOOK CLAIMED CLAIMED U/S REFER 10(38) – ENCE ADDITION U/S 68 1 BAJRANG LAL 2012-13 Twenty First Century 4,76,18,448 PB-1 BAMALWA India Ltd. 2 BAJRANG

D.C.I.T., CIRCLE- 1, DIBRUGARH vs. USHA BAMALWA, DIBRUGARH

In the result, all the appeals of the Revenue are dismissed and that of the Cross Objections of the assessees are allowed

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav, Vice-(Kz) & Shri Rajesh Kumar

section 153A has also compiled in table, which reads as under:- S.N PARTICULARS AY NAME OF THE SCRIP QUANTUM OF PAPER O IN WHICH LTCG EXEMPTION BOOK CLAIMED CLAIMED U/S REFER 10(38) – ENCE ADDITION U/S 68 1 BAJRANG LAL 2012-13 Twenty First Century 4,76,18,448 PB-1 BAMALWA India Ltd. 2 BAJRANG

D.C.I.T., CIRCLE-1, DIBRUGARH vs. BACHH RAJ BAMALWA, DIBRUGARH

In the result, all the appeals of the Revenue are dismissed and that of the Cross Objections of the assessees are allowed

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav, Vice-(Kz) & Shri Rajesh Kumar

section 153A has also compiled in table, which reads as under:- S.N PARTICULARS AY NAME OF THE SCRIP QUANTUM OF PAPER O IN WHICH LTCG EXEMPTION BOOK CLAIMED CLAIMED U/S REFER 10(38) – ENCE ADDITION U/S 68 1 BAJRANG LAL 2012-13 Twenty First Century 4,76,18,448 PB-1 BAMALWA India Ltd. 2 BAJRANG

DCIT, CIRCLE-1, DIBRUGARH vs. BAJRANG LAL BAMALWA, DIBRUGARH

In the result, all the appeals of the Revenue are dismissed and that of the Cross Objections of the assessees are allowed

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav, Vice-(Kz) & Shri Rajesh Kumar

section 153A has also compiled in table, which reads as under:- S.N PARTICULARS AY NAME OF THE SCRIP QUANTUM OF PAPER O IN WHICH LTCG EXEMPTION BOOK CLAIMED CLAIMED U/S REFER 10(38) – ENCE ADDITION U/S 68 1 BAJRANG LAL 2012-13 Twenty First Century 4,76,18,448 PB-1 BAMALWA India Ltd. 2 BAJRANG

D.C.I.T., CIRCLE- 1, DIBRUGARH vs. HANS RAJ BAMALWA, DIBRUGARH

In the result, all the appeals of the Revenue are dismissed and that of the Cross Objections of the assessees are allowed

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav, Vice-(Kz) & Shri Rajesh Kumar

section 153A has also compiled in table, which reads as under:- S.N PARTICULARS AY NAME OF THE SCRIP QUANTUM OF PAPER O IN WHICH LTCG EXEMPTION BOOK CLAIMED CLAIMED U/S REFER 10(38) – ENCE ADDITION U/S 68 1 BAJRANG LAL 2012-13 Twenty First Century 4,76,18,448 PB-1 BAMALWA India Ltd. 2 BAJRANG

D.C.I.T., CIRCLE-1, DIBRUGARH vs. VINAY BAMALWA, DIBRUGARH

In the result, all the appeals of the Revenue are dismissed and that of the Cross Objections of the assessees are allowed

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav, Vice-(Kz) & Shri Rajesh Kumar

section 153A has also compiled in table, which reads as under:- S.N PARTICULARS AY NAME OF THE SCRIP QUANTUM OF PAPER O IN WHICH LTCG EXEMPTION BOOK CLAIMED CLAIMED U/S REFER 10(38) – ENCE ADDITION U/S 68 1 BAJRANG LAL 2012-13 Twenty First Century 4,76,18,448 PB-1 BAMALWA India Ltd. 2 BAJRANG

D.C.I.T., CIRCLE-1, DIBRUGARH vs. RAVI BAMALWA, DIBRUGARH

In the result, all the appeals of the Revenue are dismissed and that of the Cross Objections of the assessees are allowed

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav, Vice-(Kz) & Shri Rajesh Kumar

section 153A has also compiled in table, which reads as under:- S.N PARTICULARS AY NAME OF THE SCRIP QUANTUM OF PAPER O IN WHICH LTCG EXEMPTION BOOK CLAIMED CLAIMED U/S REFER 10(38) – ENCE ADDITION U/S 68 1 BAJRANG LAL 2012-13 Twenty First Century 4,76,18,448 PB-1 BAMALWA India Ltd. 2 BAJRANG

D.C.I.T., CIRCLE-1, DIBRUGARH vs. MADAN LAL BAMALWA, DIBRUGARH

In the result, all the appeals of the Revenue are dismissed and that of the Cross Objections of the assessees are allowed

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav, Vice-(Kz) & Shri Rajesh Kumar

section 153A has also compiled in table, which reads as under:- S.N PARTICULARS AY NAME OF THE SCRIP QUANTUM OF PAPER O IN WHICH LTCG EXEMPTION BOOK CLAIMED CLAIMED U/S REFER 10(38) – ENCE ADDITION U/S 68 1 BAJRANG LAL 2012-13 Twenty First Century 4,76,18,448 PB-1 BAMALWA India Ltd. 2 BAJRANG

D.C.I.T., CIRCLE-1, DIBRUGARH vs. SHEETAL BAMALWA, DIBRUGARH

In the result, all the appeals of the Revenue are dismissed and that of the Cross Objections of the assessees are allowed

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav, Vice-(Kz) & Shri Rajesh Kumar

section 153A has also compiled in table, which reads as under:- S.N PARTICULARS AY NAME OF THE SCRIP QUANTUM OF PAPER O IN WHICH LTCG EXEMPTION BOOK CLAIMED CLAIMED U/S REFER 10(38) – ENCE ADDITION U/S 68 1 BAJRANG LAL 2012-13 Twenty First Century 4,76,18,448 PB-1 BAMALWA India Ltd. 2 BAJRANG

D.C.I.T., CIRCLE-1, DIBRUGARH vs. PRAMOD KUMAR BAMALWA, DIBRUGARH

In the result, all the appeals of the Revenue are dismissed and that of the Cross Objections of the assessees are allowed

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav, Vice-(Kz) & Shri Rajesh Kumar

section 153A has also compiled in table, which reads as under:- S.N PARTICULARS AY NAME OF THE SCRIP QUANTUM OF PAPER O IN WHICH LTCG EXEMPTION BOOK CLAIMED CLAIMED U/S REFER 10(38) – ENCE ADDITION U/S 68 1 BAJRANG LAL 2012-13 Twenty First Century 4,76,18,448 PB-1 BAMALWA India Ltd. 2 BAJRANG

D.C.I.T., CIRCLE-1, DIBRUGARH vs. VINOD BAMALWA, DIBRUGARH

In the result, all the appeals of the Revenue are dismissed and that of the Cross Objections of the assessees are allowed

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav, Vice-(Kz) & Shri Rajesh Kumar

section 153A has also compiled in table, which reads as under:- S.N PARTICULARS AY NAME OF THE SCRIP QUANTUM OF PAPER O IN WHICH LTCG EXEMPTION BOOK CLAIMED CLAIMED U/S REFER 10(38) – ENCE ADDITION U/S 68 1 BAJRANG LAL 2012-13 Twenty First Century 4,76,18,448 PB-1 BAMALWA India Ltd. 2 BAJRANG

D.C.I.T., CIRCLE- 1, DIBRUGARH vs. MEENAKSHI BAMALWA SONI, DIBRUGARH

In the result, all the appeals of the Revenue are dismissed and that of the Cross Objections of the assessees are allowed

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav, Vice-(Kz) & Shri Rajesh Kumar

section 153A has also compiled in table, which reads as under:- S.N PARTICULARS AY NAME OF THE SCRIP QUANTUM OF PAPER O IN WHICH LTCG EXEMPTION BOOK CLAIMED CLAIMED U/S REFER 10(38) – ENCE ADDITION U/S 68 1 BAJRANG LAL 2012-13 Twenty First Century 4,76,18,448 PB-1 BAMALWA India Ltd. 2 BAJRANG

INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-3(4), GUWAHATI vs. SINU SONTHALIA, GUWAHATI

In the result, the appeal of the revenue is partly allowed

section 41(1) of the Act are attracted. Thus, we confirm the addition of Rs.1,04,24,883/- made in the case of M/s.Anurag Packaging & Rs.93,43,452/- made in the case of M/s. Maa Kamakhya Packaging totaling to Rs.1,97,68

ACCRECENT WAY MARKETING (P) LTD.,GUWAHATI vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-3, GUWAHATI

Bench: Shri Manomohan Das & Shri Rakesh Mishra

Section 68 in this case is highly irregular and against the provisions of law. The Assessment Order may therefore be struck down as illegal. Ground 3: For that the Learned CIT(A) has failed to appreciate the facts and circumstances of the claim for deduction raised before her in regard to liability of 5,11,68,800/- which

MAYURPLY INDUSTRIES PVT LTD.,HOOGHLY, WEST BENGAL vs. ACIT, CIRCLE 3, GUWAHATI, ASSAM

In the result IT(SS)A Nos

Bench: Shri Rajesh Kumar, Am & Shri Manomohan Das, Jm

41(4) of the Income-tax Act as laid down by their Lordship of Delhi High Court in the decisions quoted (supra). Bad debts could not be disallowed on this ground. 12.4 Reason No. (v) has already been referred to above. 12.5 It is, therefore, clear that all relevant material to decide the matter with reference to section

ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1, GUWAHATI vs. ABCI INFRASTRUCTURES PRIVATE LIMITED, KOLKATA

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed, whereas the appeal of the Revenue is dismissed

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav, Vice-(Kz) & Dr. Manish Borad

68,972/-. 4. On appeal, the ld. CIT(Appeals) has observed that the assessee has submitted that it is a ledger account of M/s. Silverpoint Infratech Limited in the books of ABCL Infrastructure Pvt. Limited. The assessee got contracts from three companies, namely Patel Engineering Limited, Mumbai, Coastal Projects Limited, Hyderabad; Horizon Infrastructure Limited. These were sub-contracted on back