100 results for “section 68”+ Section 36(2)clear
Sorted by relevance
Key Topics
Showing 1–20 of 100 · Page 1 of 5
In the result IT(SS)A Nos
Bench: Shri Rajesh Kumar, Am & Shri Manomohan Das, Jm
2. (a) For that on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the Ld. CIT(A) ought to have deleted the addition made by the A.O. on account of unsecured loans treating it as unexplained credit of Rs. 4,03,00,000/wrongly invoking the provisions of section 68. (b) For that the Ld. CIT(A) failed