D.C.I.T., CIRCLE- 1, DIBRUGARH vs. BHAGWATI DEVII BAMALWA , DIBRUGARH

In the result, all the appeals of the Revenue are dismissed and that of the Cross Objections of the assessees are allowed

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav, Vice-(Kz) & Shri Rajesh Kumar

68 1 BAJRANG LAL 2012-13 Twenty First Century 4,76,18,448 PB-1 BAMALWA India Ltd. 2 BAJRANG LAL 2013-14 Twenty First Century 3,79,39,430 PB-2 BAMALWA India Ltd. (Clubbed income of Minor Son RohitBamalwa) 3 BACHH RAJ 2012-13 Twenty First Century 9,52,37,280 PB-3 BAMALWA India Ltd. (Self

D.C.I.T., CIRCLE-1, DIBRUGARH vs. BACHH RAJ BAMALWA, DIBRUGARH

In the result, all the appeals of the Revenue are dismissed and that of the Cross Objections of the assessees are allowed

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav, Vice-(Kz) & Shri Rajesh Kumar

68 1 BAJRANG LAL 2012-13 Twenty First Century 4,76,18,448 PB-1 BAMALWA India Ltd. 2 BAJRANG LAL 2013-14 Twenty First Century 3,79,39,430 PB-2 BAMALWA India Ltd. (Clubbed income of Minor Son RohitBamalwa) 3 BACHH RAJ 2012-13 Twenty First Century 9,52,37,280 PB-3 BAMALWA India Ltd. (Self

D.C.I.T., CIRCLE- 1, DIBRUGARH vs. HANS RAJ BAMALWA, DIBRUGARH

In the result, all the appeals of the Revenue are dismissed and that of the Cross Objections of the assessees are allowed

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav, Vice-(Kz) & Shri Rajesh Kumar

68 1 BAJRANG LAL 2012-13 Twenty First Century 4,76,18,448 PB-1 BAMALWA India Ltd. 2 BAJRANG LAL 2013-14 Twenty First Century 3,79,39,430 PB-2 BAMALWA India Ltd. (Clubbed income of Minor Son RohitBamalwa) 3 BACHH RAJ 2012-13 Twenty First Century 9,52,37,280 PB-3 BAMALWA India Ltd. (Self

D.C.I.T., CIRCLE- 1, DIBRUGARH vs. HANS RAJ BAMALWA (HUF), DIBRUGARH

In the result, all the appeals of the Revenue are dismissed and that of the Cross Objections of the assessees are allowed

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav, Vice-(Kz) & Shri Rajesh Kumar

68 1 BAJRANG LAL 2012-13 Twenty First Century 4,76,18,448 PB-1 BAMALWA India Ltd. 2 BAJRANG LAL 2013-14 Twenty First Century 3,79,39,430 PB-2 BAMALWA India Ltd. (Clubbed income of Minor Son RohitBamalwa) 3 BACHH RAJ 2012-13 Twenty First Century 9,52,37,280 PB-3 BAMALWA India Ltd. (Self

D.C.I.T., CIRCLE- 1, DIBRUGARH vs. USHA BAMALWA, DIBRUGARH

In the result, all the appeals of the Revenue are dismissed and that of the Cross Objections of the assessees are allowed

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav, Vice-(Kz) & Shri Rajesh Kumar

68 1 BAJRANG LAL 2012-13 Twenty First Century 4,76,18,448 PB-1 BAMALWA India Ltd. 2 BAJRANG LAL 2013-14 Twenty First Century 3,79,39,430 PB-2 BAMALWA India Ltd. (Clubbed income of Minor Son RohitBamalwa) 3 BACHH RAJ 2012-13 Twenty First Century 9,52,37,280 PB-3 BAMALWA India Ltd. (Self

DCIT, CIRCLE-1, DIBRUGARH vs. BAJRANG LAL BAMALWA, DIBRUGARH

In the result, all the appeals of the Revenue are dismissed and that of the Cross Objections of the assessees are allowed

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav, Vice-(Kz) & Shri Rajesh Kumar

68 1 BAJRANG LAL 2012-13 Twenty First Century 4,76,18,448 PB-1 BAMALWA India Ltd. 2 BAJRANG LAL 2013-14 Twenty First Century 3,79,39,430 PB-2 BAMALWA India Ltd. (Clubbed income of Minor Son RohitBamalwa) 3 BACHH RAJ 2012-13 Twenty First Century 9,52,37,280 PB-3 BAMALWA India Ltd. (Self

D.C.I.T., CIRCLE-1, DIBRUGARH vs. BACHH RAJ BAMALWA, DIBRUGARH

In the result, all the appeals of the Revenue are dismissed and that of the Cross Objections of the assessees are allowed

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav, Vice-(Kz) & Shri Rajesh Kumar

68 1 BAJRANG LAL 2012-13 Twenty First Century 4,76,18,448 PB-1 BAMALWA India Ltd. 2 BAJRANG LAL 2013-14 Twenty First Century 3,79,39,430 PB-2 BAMALWA India Ltd. (Clubbed income of Minor Son RohitBamalwa) 3 BACHH RAJ 2012-13 Twenty First Century 9,52,37,280 PB-3 BAMALWA India Ltd. (Self

D.C.I.T., CIRCLE- 1, DIBRUGARH vs. VISHAL BAMALWA , DIBRUGARH

In the result, all the appeals of the Revenue are dismissed and that of the Cross Objections of the assessees are allowed

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav, Vice-(Kz) & Shri Rajesh Kumar

68 1 BAJRANG LAL 2012-13 Twenty First Century 4,76,18,448 PB-1 BAMALWA India Ltd. 2 BAJRANG LAL 2013-14 Twenty First Century 3,79,39,430 PB-2 BAMALWA India Ltd. (Clubbed income of Minor Son RohitBamalwa) 3 BACHH RAJ 2012-13 Twenty First Century 9,52,37,280 PB-3 BAMALWA India Ltd. (Self

D.C.I.T., CIRCLE-1, DIBRUGARH vs. VINAY BAMALWA, DIBRUGARH

In the result, all the appeals of the Revenue are dismissed and that of the Cross Objections of the assessees are allowed

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav, Vice-(Kz) & Shri Rajesh Kumar

68 1 BAJRANG LAL 2012-13 Twenty First Century 4,76,18,448 PB-1 BAMALWA India Ltd. 2 BAJRANG LAL 2013-14 Twenty First Century 3,79,39,430 PB-2 BAMALWA India Ltd. (Clubbed income of Minor Son RohitBamalwa) 3 BACHH RAJ 2012-13 Twenty First Century 9,52,37,280 PB-3 BAMALWA India Ltd. (Self

D.C.I.T., CIRCLE-1, DIBRUGARH vs. RAVI BAMALWA, DIBRUGARH

In the result, all the appeals of the Revenue are dismissed and that of the Cross Objections of the assessees are allowed

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav, Vice-(Kz) & Shri Rajesh Kumar

68 1 BAJRANG LAL 2012-13 Twenty First Century 4,76,18,448 PB-1 BAMALWA India Ltd. 2 BAJRANG LAL 2013-14 Twenty First Century 3,79,39,430 PB-2 BAMALWA India Ltd. (Clubbed income of Minor Son RohitBamalwa) 3 BACHH RAJ 2012-13 Twenty First Century 9,52,37,280 PB-3 BAMALWA India Ltd. (Self

D.C.I.T., CIRCLE-1, DIBRUGARH vs. MADAN LAL BAMALWA, DIBRUGARH

In the result, all the appeals of the Revenue are dismissed and that of the Cross Objections of the assessees are allowed

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav, Vice-(Kz) & Shri Rajesh Kumar

68 1 BAJRANG LAL 2012-13 Twenty First Century 4,76,18,448 PB-1 BAMALWA India Ltd. 2 BAJRANG LAL 2013-14 Twenty First Century 3,79,39,430 PB-2 BAMALWA India Ltd. (Clubbed income of Minor Son RohitBamalwa) 3 BACHH RAJ 2012-13 Twenty First Century 9,52,37,280 PB-3 BAMALWA India Ltd. (Self

D.C.I.T., CIRCLE-1, DIBRUGARH vs. SHEETAL BAMALWA, DIBRUGARH

In the result, all the appeals of the Revenue are dismissed and that of the Cross Objections of the assessees are allowed

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav, Vice-(Kz) & Shri Rajesh Kumar

68 1 BAJRANG LAL 2012-13 Twenty First Century 4,76,18,448 PB-1 BAMALWA India Ltd. 2 BAJRANG LAL 2013-14 Twenty First Century 3,79,39,430 PB-2 BAMALWA India Ltd. (Clubbed income of Minor Son RohitBamalwa) 3 BACHH RAJ 2012-13 Twenty First Century 9,52,37,280 PB-3 BAMALWA India Ltd. (Self

D.C.I.T., CIRCLE-1, DIBRUGARH vs. PRAMOD KUMAR BAMALWA, DIBRUGARH

In the result, all the appeals of the Revenue are dismissed and that of the Cross Objections of the assessees are allowed

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav, Vice-(Kz) & Shri Rajesh Kumar

68 1 BAJRANG LAL 2012-13 Twenty First Century 4,76,18,448 PB-1 BAMALWA India Ltd. 2 BAJRANG LAL 2013-14 Twenty First Century 3,79,39,430 PB-2 BAMALWA India Ltd. (Clubbed income of Minor Son RohitBamalwa) 3 BACHH RAJ 2012-13 Twenty First Century 9,52,37,280 PB-3 BAMALWA India Ltd. (Self

D.C.I.T., CIRCLE-1, DIBRUGARH vs. VINOD BAMALWA, DIBRUGARH

In the result, all the appeals of the Revenue are dismissed and that of the Cross Objections of the assessees are allowed

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav, Vice-(Kz) & Shri Rajesh Kumar

68 1 BAJRANG LAL 2012-13 Twenty First Century 4,76,18,448 PB-1 BAMALWA India Ltd. 2 BAJRANG LAL 2013-14 Twenty First Century 3,79,39,430 PB-2 BAMALWA India Ltd. (Clubbed income of Minor Son RohitBamalwa) 3 BACHH RAJ 2012-13 Twenty First Century 9,52,37,280 PB-3 BAMALWA India Ltd. (Self

MAYURPLY INDUSTRIES PVT LTD.,HOOGHLY, WEST BENGAL vs. ACIT, CIRCLE 3, GUWAHATI, ASSAM

In the result IT(SS)A Nos

Bench: Shri Rajesh Kumar, Am & Shri Manomohan Das, Jm

68 of the Act. The case of the assessee find support from the decision of Hon'ble Apex Court in the case of PCIT Vs Abhisar Buildwell P. Ltd. (supra), wherein the Hon'ble Court has held as under:- “5. We have heard learned counsel for the respective parties at length. The question which is posed for consideration

ACCRECENT WAY MARKETING (P) LTD.,GUWAHATI vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-3, GUWAHATI

Bench: Shri Manomohan Das & Shri Rakesh Mishra

ii) Smt. Jayati Bhattachargee Debnath. The assessee company had shown gross turnover from its business at Rs. 31,59,75,687/- and the object of the company is trading of various FMCG products and insurance products and after meeting various expenditure incidental to its business, the net profit has been disclosed at Rs. 1,06,48,066/- which is worked

KARAN JAIN,MUMBAI vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-1, GUWAHATI

In the result, the all the appeals of the assessees are allowed

Bench: Shri Rajesh Kumar, Am & Shri Manomohan Das, Jm

1) and Section 153D leave no room for doubt that approval with respect to "each assessment year" is to be obtained by the Assessing Officer on the draft assessment order before passing the assessment order under Section 153A." [Emphasis supplied] 12. It is observed that the Court in the case of Sapna Gupta (supra) refused to interdict

RESHMI JAIN,MUMBAI vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-1, GUWAHATI

In the result, the all the appeals of the assessees are allowed

Bench: Shri Rajesh Kumar, Am & Shri Manomohan Das, Jm

1) and Section 153D leave no room for doubt that approval with respect to "each assessment year" is to be obtained by the Assessing Officer on the draft assessment order before passing the assessment order under Section 153A." [Emphasis supplied] 12. It is observed that the Court in the case of Sapna Gupta (supra) refused to interdict