DCIT, CIRCLE-1, DIBRUGARH vs. BAJRANG LAL BAMALWA, DIBRUGARH

In the result, all the appeals of the Revenue are dismissed and that of the Cross Objections of the assessees are allowed

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav, Vice-(Kz) & Shri Rajesh Kumar

section 153A has also compiled in table, which reads as under:- S.N PARTICULARS AY NAME OF THE SCRIP QUANTUM OF PAPER O IN WHICH LTCG EXEMPTION BOOK CLAIMED CLAIMED U/S REFER 10(38) – ENCE ADDITION U/S 68 1 BAJRANG LAL 2012-13 Twenty First Century 4,76,18,448 PB-1 BAMALWA India Ltd. 2 BAJRANG

D.C.I.T., CIRCLE- 1, DIBRUGARH vs. USHA BAMALWA, DIBRUGARH

In the result, all the appeals of the Revenue are dismissed and that of the Cross Objections of the assessees are allowed

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav, Vice-(Kz) & Shri Rajesh Kumar

section 153A has also compiled in table, which reads as under:- S.N PARTICULARS AY NAME OF THE SCRIP QUANTUM OF PAPER O IN WHICH LTCG EXEMPTION BOOK CLAIMED CLAIMED U/S REFER 10(38) – ENCE ADDITION U/S 68 1 BAJRANG LAL 2012-13 Twenty First Century 4,76,18,448 PB-1 BAMALWA India Ltd. 2 BAJRANG

D.C.I.T., CIRCLE-1, DIBRUGARH vs. BACHH RAJ BAMALWA, DIBRUGARH

In the result, all the appeals of the Revenue are dismissed and that of the Cross Objections of the assessees are allowed

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav, Vice-(Kz) & Shri Rajesh Kumar

section 153A has also compiled in table, which reads as under:- S.N PARTICULARS AY NAME OF THE SCRIP QUANTUM OF PAPER O IN WHICH LTCG EXEMPTION BOOK CLAIMED CLAIMED U/S REFER 10(38) – ENCE ADDITION U/S 68 1 BAJRANG LAL 2012-13 Twenty First Century 4,76,18,448 PB-1 BAMALWA India Ltd. 2 BAJRANG

D.C.I.T., CIRCLE-1, DIBRUGARH vs. BACHH RAJ BAMALWA, DIBRUGARH

In the result, all the appeals of the Revenue are dismissed and that of the Cross Objections of the assessees are allowed

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav, Vice-(Kz) & Shri Rajesh Kumar

section 153A has also compiled in table, which reads as under:- S.N PARTICULARS AY NAME OF THE SCRIP QUANTUM OF PAPER O IN WHICH LTCG EXEMPTION BOOK CLAIMED CLAIMED U/S REFER 10(38) – ENCE ADDITION U/S 68 1 BAJRANG LAL 2012-13 Twenty First Century 4,76,18,448 PB-1 BAMALWA India Ltd. 2 BAJRANG

D.C.I.T., CIRCLE- 1, DIBRUGARH vs. HANS RAJ BAMALWA, DIBRUGARH

In the result, all the appeals of the Revenue are dismissed and that of the Cross Objections of the assessees are allowed

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav, Vice-(Kz) & Shri Rajesh Kumar

section 153A has also compiled in table, which reads as under:- S.N PARTICULARS AY NAME OF THE SCRIP QUANTUM OF PAPER O IN WHICH LTCG EXEMPTION BOOK CLAIMED CLAIMED U/S REFER 10(38) – ENCE ADDITION U/S 68 1 BAJRANG LAL 2012-13 Twenty First Century 4,76,18,448 PB-1 BAMALWA India Ltd. 2 BAJRANG

D.C.I.T., CIRCLE- 1, DIBRUGARH vs. HANS RAJ BAMALWA (HUF), DIBRUGARH

In the result, all the appeals of the Revenue are dismissed and that of the Cross Objections of the assessees are allowed

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav, Vice-(Kz) & Shri Rajesh Kumar

section 153A has also compiled in table, which reads as under:- S.N PARTICULARS AY NAME OF THE SCRIP QUANTUM OF PAPER O IN WHICH LTCG EXEMPTION BOOK CLAIMED CLAIMED U/S REFER 10(38) – ENCE ADDITION U/S 68 1 BAJRANG LAL 2012-13 Twenty First Century 4,76,18,448 PB-1 BAMALWA India Ltd. 2 BAJRANG

DCIT, CIRCLE-1, DIBRUGARH vs. BAJRANG LAL BAMALWA, DIBRUGARH

In the result, all the appeals of the Revenue are dismissed and that of the Cross Objections of the assessees are allowed

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav, Vice-(Kz) & Shri Rajesh Kumar

section 153A has also compiled in table, which reads as under:- S.N PARTICULARS AY NAME OF THE SCRIP QUANTUM OF PAPER O IN WHICH LTCG EXEMPTION BOOK CLAIMED CLAIMED U/S REFER 10(38) – ENCE ADDITION U/S 68 1 BAJRANG LAL 2012-13 Twenty First Century 4,76,18,448 PB-1 BAMALWA India Ltd. 2 BAJRANG

D.C.I.T., CIRCLE- 1, DIBRUGARH vs. MEENAKSHI BAMALWA SONI, DIBRUGARH

In the result, all the appeals of the Revenue are dismissed and that of the Cross Objections of the assessees are allowed

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav, Vice-(Kz) & Shri Rajesh Kumar

section 153A has also compiled in table, which reads as under:- S.N PARTICULARS AY NAME OF THE SCRIP QUANTUM OF PAPER O IN WHICH LTCG EXEMPTION BOOK CLAIMED CLAIMED U/S REFER 10(38) – ENCE ADDITION U/S 68 1 BAJRANG LAL 2012-13 Twenty First Century 4,76,18,448 PB-1 BAMALWA India Ltd. 2 BAJRANG

D.C.I.T., CIRCLE- 1, DIBRUGARH vs. BHAGWATI DEVII BAMALWA , DIBRUGARH

In the result, all the appeals of the Revenue are dismissed and that of the Cross Objections of the assessees are allowed

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav, Vice-(Kz) & Shri Rajesh Kumar

section 153A has also compiled in table, which reads as under:- S.N PARTICULARS AY NAME OF THE SCRIP QUANTUM OF PAPER O IN WHICH LTCG EXEMPTION BOOK CLAIMED CLAIMED U/S REFER 10(38) – ENCE ADDITION U/S 68 1 BAJRANG LAL 2012-13 Twenty First Century 4,76,18,448 PB-1 BAMALWA India Ltd. 2 BAJRANG

D.C.I.T., CIRCLE- 1, DIBRUGARH vs. VISHAL BAMALWA , DIBRUGARH

In the result, all the appeals of the Revenue are dismissed and that of the Cross Objections of the assessees are allowed

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav, Vice-(Kz) & Shri Rajesh Kumar

section 153A has also compiled in table, which reads as under:- S.N PARTICULARS AY NAME OF THE SCRIP QUANTUM OF PAPER O IN WHICH LTCG EXEMPTION BOOK CLAIMED CLAIMED U/S REFER 10(38) – ENCE ADDITION U/S 68 1 BAJRANG LAL 2012-13 Twenty First Century 4,76,18,448 PB-1 BAMALWA India Ltd. 2 BAJRANG

D.C.I.T., CIRCLE-1, DIBRUGARH vs. VINAY BAMALWA, DIBRUGARH

In the result, all the appeals of the Revenue are dismissed and that of the Cross Objections of the assessees are allowed

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav, Vice-(Kz) & Shri Rajesh Kumar

section 153A has also compiled in table, which reads as under:- S.N PARTICULARS AY NAME OF THE SCRIP QUANTUM OF PAPER O IN WHICH LTCG EXEMPTION BOOK CLAIMED CLAIMED U/S REFER 10(38) – ENCE ADDITION U/S 68 1 BAJRANG LAL 2012-13 Twenty First Century 4,76,18,448 PB-1 BAMALWA India Ltd. 2 BAJRANG

D.C.I.T., CIRCLE-1, DIBRUGARH vs. RAVI BAMALWA, DIBRUGARH

In the result, all the appeals of the Revenue are dismissed and that of the Cross Objections of the assessees are allowed

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav, Vice-(Kz) & Shri Rajesh Kumar

section 153A has also compiled in table, which reads as under:- S.N PARTICULARS AY NAME OF THE SCRIP QUANTUM OF PAPER O IN WHICH LTCG EXEMPTION BOOK CLAIMED CLAIMED U/S REFER 10(38) – ENCE ADDITION U/S 68 1 BAJRANG LAL 2012-13 Twenty First Century 4,76,18,448 PB-1 BAMALWA India Ltd. 2 BAJRANG

D.C.I.T., CIRCLE-1, DIBRUGARH vs. MADAN LAL BAMALWA, DIBRUGARH

In the result, all the appeals of the Revenue are dismissed and that of the Cross Objections of the assessees are allowed

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav, Vice-(Kz) & Shri Rajesh Kumar

section 153A has also compiled in table, which reads as under:- S.N PARTICULARS AY NAME OF THE SCRIP QUANTUM OF PAPER O IN WHICH LTCG EXEMPTION BOOK CLAIMED CLAIMED U/S REFER 10(38) – ENCE ADDITION U/S 68 1 BAJRANG LAL 2012-13 Twenty First Century 4,76,18,448 PB-1 BAMALWA India Ltd. 2 BAJRANG

D.C.I.T., CIRCLE-1, DIBRUGARH vs. SHEETAL BAMALWA, DIBRUGARH

In the result, all the appeals of the Revenue are dismissed and that of the Cross Objections of the assessees are allowed

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav, Vice-(Kz) & Shri Rajesh Kumar

section 153A has also compiled in table, which reads as under:- S.N PARTICULARS AY NAME OF THE SCRIP QUANTUM OF PAPER O IN WHICH LTCG EXEMPTION BOOK CLAIMED CLAIMED U/S REFER 10(38) – ENCE ADDITION U/S 68 1 BAJRANG LAL 2012-13 Twenty First Century 4,76,18,448 PB-1 BAMALWA India Ltd. 2 BAJRANG

MAYURPLY INDUSTRIES PVT LTD.,HOOGHLY, WEST BENGAL vs. ACIT, CIRCLE 3, GUWAHATI, ASSAM

In the result IT(SS)A Nos

Bench: Shri Rajesh Kumar, Am & Shri Manomohan Das, Jm

36(1)(vii), in my opinion, above requirement in this case was fully satisfied. The assessee had written off debts in the year under consideration. The assessee also filed evidence in the shape of copies of action taken against the debts in proceedings before learned CIT (Appeals). The claim of the assessee that to this day, not a single penny

ACCRECENT WAY MARKETING (P) LTD.,GUWAHATI vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-3, GUWAHATI

Bench: Shri Manomohan Das & Shri Rakesh Mishra

68,800/- which was erroneously offered as Income by the appellant company and was thoroughly unjustified in disallowing the claim raised before her. 4. For that the appellant urges leave to raise any further/ additional ground at the time of hearing of the appeal.” 3. Brief facts of the case are that the assessee company had e-filed the return

RESHMI JAIN,MUMBAI vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-1, GUWAHATI

In the result, the all the appeals of the assessees are allowed

Bench: Shri Rajesh Kumar, Am & Shri Manomohan Das, Jm

1) and Section 153D leave no room for doubt that approval with respect to "each assessment year" is to be obtained by the Assessing Officer on the draft assessment order before passing the assessment order under Section 153A." [Emphasis supplied] 12. It is observed that the Court in the case of Sapna Gupta (supra) refused to interdict

KARAN JAIN,MUMBAI vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-1, GUWAHATI

In the result, the all the appeals of the assessees are allowed

Bench: Shri Rajesh Kumar, Am & Shri Manomohan Das, Jm

1) and Section 153D leave no room for doubt that approval with respect to "each assessment year" is to be obtained by the Assessing Officer on the draft assessment order before passing the assessment order under Section 153A." [Emphasis supplied] 12. It is observed that the Court in the case of Sapna Gupta (supra) refused to interdict