BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

2 results for “section 68”+ Section 292clear

Sorted by relevance

Delhi569Mumbai460Karnataka442Bangalore205Kolkata129Jaipur103Chennai91Ahmedabad84Hyderabad84Pune74Surat58Indore48Chandigarh43Rajkot42Panaji31Cochin31Cuttack29Raipur25Visakhapatnam24Amritsar19Nagpur18Calcutta17Lucknow13Patna12Telangana11Ranchi9Agra8Allahabad4Rajasthan3SC2Guwahati2Gauhati2Jodhpur1Andhra Pradesh1Orissa1

Key Topics

Section 153A6Section 132(4)6Section 2502Section 1322Addition to Income2Undisclosed Income2

ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-1, GUWAHATI vs. ROHIT JAIN, SHILLONG

In the result, the appeals filed by the Revenue are dismissed

ITA 338/GTY/2019[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Guwahati05 Jul 2023AY 2016-17

Bench: Sri Rajpal Yadav(Kz) & Dr. Manish Borad

Section 132Section 132(4)Section 153ASection 250

68 of the Income Tax Act. 1961 in the instant case and therefore, action inviting the mischief thereof does not arise and the Ld. Commissioner (Appeals) in reversing such flawed approach considering the facts and circumstances of the case in their totality was absolutely correct in his findings which were in consonance with the inalienable position

ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-1, GUWAHATI vs. ROHIT JAIN, SHILLONG

In the result, the appeals filed by the Revenue are dismissed

ITA 339/GTY/2019[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Guwahati05 Jul 2023AY 2017-18

Bench: Sri Rajpal Yadav(Kz) & Dr. Manish Borad

Section 132Section 132(4)Section 153ASection 250

68 of the Income Tax Act. 1961 in the instant case and therefore, action inviting the mischief thereof does not arise and the Ld. Commissioner (Appeals) in reversing such flawed approach considering the facts and circumstances of the case in their totality was absolutely correct in his findings which were in consonance with the inalienable position