BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

9 results for “section 68”+ Section 264clear

Sorted by relevance

Delhi626Mumbai502Karnataka444Bangalore181Kolkata154Jaipur139Chennai125Ahmedabad80Hyderabad56Pune53Calcutta51Indore44Chandigarh43Cochin34Surat33Visakhapatnam23Rajkot21Cuttack20Raipur18SC17Lucknow15Telangana14Nagpur11Allahabad9Guwahati9Dehradun7Agra6Rajasthan6Jodhpur5Varanasi5Patna4Jabalpur4Amritsar4Ranchi2Orissa2Andhra Pradesh1Uttarakhand1

Key Topics

Section 6810Addition to Income9Section 1478Section 143(3)7Section 143(2)6Section 1484Section 153A4Search & Seizure4Section 2503Section 264

BAGDEVI SUPPLIERS (P) LTD,KOLKATA vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-1, SHILLONG

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is partly allowed

ITA 15/GTY/2019[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Guwahati30 Mar 2023AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav, Vice-(Kz) & Dr. Manish Borad

Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 264Section 68

264 empowers the ld. Principal Chief CIT or ld. Principal CIT to exercise revisionary powers on the application of an assessee or on their own motion. In the original assessment order, an addition of Rs.1,86,00,000/- was made under section 68

MANOJ ANAND,GUWAHATI vs. ITO W-2(2) GHY, GUWAHATI

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed

3
Reassessment2
Disallowance2
ITA 273/GTY/2024[2018-19]Status: Disposed
ITAT Guwahati
02 Dec 2025
AY 2018-19

Bench: Shri Rajesh Kumar, Am & Shri Manomohan Das, Jm Manoj Anand Ito W-2(2), Ghy Flat 4D, Garima Grand, Aaykar Bhawan, Christian Basti, Departmental Representative B. G.S. Road, Guwahati-781005, Vs. Baruah Road, Guwahati-781007, Assam Assam (Appellant) (Respondent) Pan No. Agbpa9883C

For Appellant: Shri Miraj D Shah, ARFor Respondent: Shri Sanjay Jha, DR
Section 144BSection 147Section 148Section 68

section 144B of the Act dated 25.03.2023. 3.2. In the appellate proceedings, the ld. CIT (A) also confirmed the order of the ld. AO by dismissing the appeal of the assessee by observing and holding as under:- Manoj Anand; A.Y. 2018-19 “The sole issue involved in the appellant's appeal is that during the relevant previous year

DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE -TINSUKIA , TINSUKIA vs. KRISHNA BORTHAKUR, L/R OF LATE KAMAKHYA BORTHAKUR, TINSUKIA

In the result, the appeal of the Revenue is partly allowed

ITA 456/GTY/2013[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Guwahati21 Dec 2022AY 2010-11

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav, Vice-(Kz) & Dr. Manish Borad

Section 143(2)Section 271(1)(c)Section 68

68 of the Income Tax Act on account of unexplained unsecured loan. 5. Brief facts of the case are that the assessee has filed his return of income on 05.12.2011 declaring total income of Rs.57,31,744/-. The case of the assessee was selected for scrutiny assessment and a notice under section 143(2) was issued and served upon

DIVYAMALA PRAKASH,GUWAHATI vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-1, TEZPUR

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 70/GTY/2020[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Guwahati29 Nov 2023AY 2016-17

Bench: Dr. Manish Borad, Hon’Ble & Shri Sonjoy Sarma, Hon’Bleassessment Year: 2016-17 Divyamala Prakash Ito, Ward-1, Tezpur Flat No. 6A, Syndicate Marble, Six Vs. Mile Radhanagar, Guwahati-784036. Pan: Bpmpp 6934 E (Appellant) (Respondent) Present For: Appellant By : None Respondent By : Shri Arun Bhowmick, Jcit Date Of Hearing : 02.11.2023 Date Of Pronouncement : 29.11.2023 O R D E R Per Sonjoy Sarma, Jm: This Appeal Of The Assessee For The Assessment Year 2016-17 Is Directed Against The Order Dated 14.01.2020 Passed By The Ld. Commissioner Of Income-Tax (Appeals) -1, Guwahati [Hereinafter Referred To As ‘The ‘Ld. Cit(A)’].

For Appellant: NoneFor Respondent: Shri Arun Bhowmick, JCIT
Section 131Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 69A

68. Relevant observations at pages 369 and 370 of this report are reproduced hereunder:- "Merely because summons Issued to some of the creditors could not be served or they failed to attend before the assessing officer, cannot be a ground to treat the loans taken by the assessee from those creditors as non-genuine in view of the principles laid

ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1, GUWAHATI vs. ABCI INFRASTRUCTURES PRIVATE LIMITED, KOLKATA

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed, whereas the appeal of the Revenue is dismissed

ITA 1/GTY/2023[2013-14]Status: HeardITAT Guwahati03 Apr 2023AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav, Vice-(Kz) & Dr. Manish Borad

For Appellant: (1) That on the facts and in the circumstances of the case
Section 143(3)Section 147Section 148Section 153Section 153C

264 of 2016, G.A. No. 1929 of 2016 (Calcutta High Court)]. 16. Coming back to the remaining part of section 153A, it is pertinent to note that expression ‘relevant assessment year’ introduced by Finance Act, 2017 has been defined in Explanation 1 to Section 153A(1). According to this Explanation, the expression ‘relevant assessment years’ means assessment year

ABCI INFRASTRUCTURES PRIVATE LIMITED,KOLKATA vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1, GUWAHATI

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed, whereas the appeal of the Revenue is dismissed

ITA 40/GTY/2022[2013-14]Status: HeardITAT Guwahati03 Apr 2023AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav, Vice-(Kz) & Dr. Manish Borad

For Appellant: (1) That on the facts and in the circumstances of the case
Section 143(3)Section 147Section 148Section 153Section 153C

264 of 2016, G.A. No. 1929 of 2016 (Calcutta High Court)]. 16. Coming back to the remaining part of section 153A, it is pertinent to note that expression ‘relevant assessment year’ introduced by Finance Act, 2017 has been defined in Explanation 1 to Section 153A(1). According to this Explanation, the expression ‘relevant assessment years’ means assessment year

ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-1, GUWAHATI vs. M/S. PAWAN CEMENT COMPANY PRIVATE LIMITED, GUWAHATI

In the result, both the appeals filed by the Revenue for AY

ITA 72/GTY/2020[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Guwahati03 Mar 2023AY 2011-12

Bench: Sri Rajpal Yadav(Kz) & Dr. Manish Borad

Section 132Section 139(1)Section 143(2)Section 153ASection 250Section 68

68 of the Act. We observe that the assessee company is regularly filing income tax returns. For AY 2011-12 return was filed u/s 139(1) of the Act on 27.09.2011. No notice was issued u/s 143(2) of the Act within the statutory time limit. Search was conducted in the case of the assessee company on 31.08.2016. Undisputedly

ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-1, GUWAHATI vs. M/S. PAWAN CEMENT COMPANY PRIVATE LIMITED, GUWAHATI

In the result, both the appeals filed by the Revenue for AY

ITA 73/GTY/2020[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Guwahati03 Mar 2023AY 2013-14

Bench: Sri Rajpal Yadav(Kz) & Dr. Manish Borad

Section 132Section 139(1)Section 143(2)Section 153ASection 250Section 68

68 of the Act. We observe that the assessee company is regularly filing income tax returns. For AY 2011-12 return was filed u/s 139(1) of the Act on 27.09.2011. No notice was issued u/s 143(2) of the Act within the statutory time limit. Search was conducted in the case of the assessee company on 31.08.2016. Undisputedly

M/S. EVEREST INFRA ENERGY LTD.,NAHARLAGUN vs. JOINT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, RANGE - TEZPUR, TEZPUR

In the result, appeal of the assessee is dismissed

ITA 187/GTY/2018[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Guwahati27 Sept 2022AY 2012-13

Bench: Dr. Manish Borad, Hon’Ble & Shri Sonjoy Sarma, Hon’Blei.T.A. No. 187/Gty/2018 Assessment Year: 2012-13 M/S. Everest Infra Energy Limited Joint Commissioner Of Income A- Sector, Vs Tax, Tezpur C/O Everest Engineering House Naharlagun - 791110 Pan : Aabce7178B अपीलाथ"/ (Appellant) "" यथ"/ (Respondent) Assessee By : Shri Purushotam Gaggar, Fca Revenue By : Shri P.S. Thuingaleng, Acit सुनवाई क" तारीख/Date Of Hearing : 26/07/2022 घोषणा क" तारीख /Date Of Pronouncement: 27/09/2022 आदेश/O R D E R Per Dr. Manish Borad, Am : The Present Appeal Is Directed At The Instance Of The Assessee Against The Order Of The Learned Commissioner Of Income Tax (Appeals) - 1, Guwahati (Hereinafter The “Ld. Cit(A)”) Dt. 27/04/2019, Passed U/S 250 Of The Income Tax Act, 1961 (“The Act’), For Assessment Year 2012-13. 2. Brief Facts Of The Case Are That The Assessee Is A Limited Company Engaged In Construction & Installation Work. Loss Of Rs.20,84,81,814/- Declared In The Return Of Income Filed For The Assessment Year 2012-13. After The Case Being Selected For Scrutiny Under Cass & Serving Notice U/S 143(2) & 142(1) Of The Act, Various Details Were Called For & After Considering The Submissions Of The Assessee, The Ld. Assessing Officer Assessed Loss Income At Rs.13,68,94,750/- After Making Certain Disallowances/Additions. The Assessee Challenged The Addition Before The Ld. Cit(A) & Partly Succeeded & Now The Assessee Is In Appeal Before The Tribunal Raising The Sole Issue Challenging The Ld. Cit(A)’S Finding Confirming The Addition

For Appellant: Shri Purushotam Gaggar, FCAFor Respondent: Shri P.S. Thuingaleng, ACIT
Section 143(2)Section 250

68,94,750/- after making certain disallowances/additions. The assessee challenged the addition before the ld. CIT(A) and partly succeeded and now the assessee is in appeal before the Tribunal raising the sole issue challenging the ld. CIT(A)’s finding confirming the addition I.T.A. No. 187/GTY/2018 Assessment Year: 2012-13 M/s. Everest Infra Energy Limited 2 for disallowance