SHRI ABHIJIT RABHA,GUWAHATI vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-BONGAIGAON, BONGAIGAON

In the result, both the appeals filed by the assessee are allowed for statistical purposes

Bench: Sri Rajpal Yadav(Kz) & Dr. Manish Borad

250 of the Income Tax Act, I.T.A. Nos.: 162 & 163/GTY/2019 Assessment Years: 2014-15 & 2015-16 Sri Abhijit Rabha. 1961 (in short the ‘Act’) by ld. Commissioner of Income-tax (Appeals)-2, Guwahati [in short ld. ‘CIT(A)’] dated 30.11.2018. 2. When the case was called for, none appeared on behalf of the assessee. On perusal of the case file

DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE- 3, GUWAHATI vs. M/S. SATYAM ISPAT (NORTH EAST) LIMITED, BANDERDEWA

In the result, the appeals filed by the Revenue for AY 2011-

Bench: Sri Rajpal Yadav(Kz) & Dr. Manish Borad

250 of the Income Tax Act, I.T.A. Nos.: 86 & 87/GTY/2017 Assessment Years: 2011-12 & 2012-13 M/s. Satyam Ispat (North East) Limited. 1961 (in short the “Act”) by ld. Commissioner of Income-tax (Appeals)-2, Guwahati [in short ld. “CIT(A)”] dated 23.02.2017 arising out of the assessment order framed u/s 153C/143(3) of the Act dated

DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE- 3, GUWAHATI vs. M/S. SATYAM ISPAT (NORTH EAST) LIMITED, BANDERDEWA

In the result, the appeals filed by the Revenue for AY 2011-

Bench: Sri Rajpal Yadav(Kz) & Dr. Manish Borad

250 of the Income Tax Act, I.T.A. Nos.: 86 & 87/GTY/2017 Assessment Years: 2011-12 & 2012-13 M/s. Satyam Ispat (North East) Limited. 1961 (in short the “Act”) by ld. Commissioner of Income-tax (Appeals)-2, Guwahati [in short ld. “CIT(A)”] dated 23.02.2017 arising out of the assessment order framed u/s 153C/143(3) of the Act dated

DCIT,CENTRAL CIRCLE-1, GUWAHATI vs. SATISH JALAN, SHILLONG

Appeal of the Revenue is allowed for statistical purposes

Bench: Hon'Ble Itat. 3. There Are Currently More Than 300 Time Barred Assessment & 200 Penalty Cases Are Pending In This Office. Due To Shortage Of Manpower It Was Delayed In The Filing Of Appeal Before Hon'Ble Itat.

250 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (hereafter “the Act”), dated 24.12.2024, passed by the Ld. Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals), NER, Guwahati [hereafter “the Ld. CIT(A)]. 2.1 During the assessment proceedings, the assessee allegedly did not provide any details in response to the notices issued by the Ld. AO, through which details of impugned transactions, such as purpose

SUMITRA DEVI JHURIA,GUWAHATI vs. ITO-2(1) GUWAHATI, GUWAHATI

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is hereby dismissed

Bench: Levying The Special Tax Rates As Prescribed Under Section 115Bbe Of The Act.

250 of the Act dated 13.06.2024 in DIN & Order No. ITBA/NFAC/S/250/2024-25/1065637553(1). Therefore, the contentions made by the appellant with regard to re-opening of assessment u/s 147/148 of the Act and making additions made u/s 68 and 69C of the Act are redundant and infructuous. 4.2.1 Further, the provisions of the section 115BBE of the Act were introduced

AMIT KUMAR,DELHI vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD 1(1), GUWAHATI, INCOME TAX OFFICER

Bench: SHRI MANOMOHAN DAS, JUDICIAL MEMBER SHRI SANJAY AWASTHI (Accountant Member)

250 of Income Tax Act, 1961 (hereafter “the Act”) passed by the Ld. Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals), National Faceless Appeal Centre (NFAC), Delhi [hereafter “the Ld. CIT(A)”], dated 18.01.2024. I.T.A. Nos. 32 & 33/GTY/2024 Amit Kumar 2. In ITA No. 32/Gty/2024 pertaining to AY 2017-18, the Ld. AO passed an order dated 23.03.2022, through which an addition

AMIT KUMAR,DELHI vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD 1(1), GUWAHATI, INCOME TAS OFFICER

Bench: SHRI MANOMOHAN DAS, JUDICIAL MEMBER SHRI SANJAY AWASTHI (Accountant Member)

250 of Income Tax Act, 1961 (hereafter “the Act”) passed by the Ld. Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals), National Faceless Appeal Centre (NFAC), Delhi [hereafter “the Ld. CIT(A)”], dated 18.01.2024. I.T.A. Nos. 32 & 33/GTY/2024 Amit Kumar 2. In ITA No. 32/Gty/2024 pertaining to AY 2017-18, the Ld. AO passed an order dated 23.03.2022, through which an addition

SIVA SUNDARI NARISIKSHASRAM AND ANTE NATAL CLINIC,SILCHAR vs. ITO(EXEMPTION), WARD-2(3), GUWAHATI

Appeal is allowed for statistical purposes

Bench: SHRI MANOMOHAN DAS, JUDICIAL MEMBER SHRI SANJAY AWASTHI (Accountant Member)

68,88,045 + Rs. 1,53,504 = Rs. 6,70,41,549 minus Rs. 6,53,17,279), the Id. CIT(A) ought to have hold that the Id. AO was not justified in determining total income of the assessee at Rs. 6,70,41,549/- in any view of the matter. 5. For that the impugned appellate order having

DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, GUWAHATI vs. SM JDB ESTATE PRIVATE LIMITED, GUWAHATI, ASSAM

In the result, the Revenue’s appeal is dismissed

Bench: the Ld. CIT(A), the assessee filed several additional documents as new evidence for which a remand report was called from the Ld. AO. It is noteworthy that the remand report has been extensively reproduced between pages 84 to 88 of the impugned order. It is also noted with concern that instead of commenting on the new evidence the Ld. AO has merely submitted to make out a case for non-admission of the same before the Ld. CIT(A) and has not commented on the merit of the documents before him.

250 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter “the Act”), passed by the Ld. Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals), Central NER, Guwahati [hereafter the Ld. CIT(A)”] vide order dated 22.07.2024 for AY 2018-19. 1.1 It is seen that this case was selected for limited scrutiny for verifying exports/imports and share capital. During the course of assessment proceedings

D M JEWELLERS,GUWAHATI vs. ADDITIONAL / JOINT / DEPUTY / ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX/INCOME-TAX OFFICER, GUWAHATI

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes only

Bench: Shri Manomohan Das, Hon’Ble & Shri Sanjay Awasthi, Hon’Ble

250 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 Page 1 of 4 ITA NO. 107 / GTY / 2025 D.M. Jewellers -Vs- The ITO, Ward-2 (1), Guwahati AY: 2014-15 (hereinafter referred to as the ‘Act’) and pertains to the Assessment Year 2014-15. The grounds of the assessee are as under:- (i) That the learned Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) erred

RAJARSHI MOTORS PVT. LTD.,AGARTALA vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE- AGARTALA , AGARTALA

In the result, all the grounds of appeal raised by the Revenue in ITA Nos

Bench: Dr.Manish Borad & Shri Manomohan Dasआयकर अपील सं. / Ita Nos.117 To 123/Gty/2018 िनधा"रण वष" / Assessment Years : 2008-09 To 2014-15 Dcit, Rajarshi Motors Pvt. Ltd., Circle Agartala A.A. Road, Chandrapur, Vs. Agartala, Tripura Pan : Aaccr8033P अपीलाथ" / Appellant ""यथ" / Respondent

68............................................................................Rs. 78,967/- Voluntary Disclosure 11. In course of search proceedings, Shri Swapan Kumar paul, Key person of the Swapan Kumar Paul group disclosed voluntarily Rs. 19,55,75,000/- as undisclosed income and submitted details of disclosure u/s. 132(4) as Annexure-2 of disclosure petition submitted on 10-12- 2013. According to his disclosure

RAJARSHI MOTORS PVT. LTD.,AGARTALA vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE- AGARTALA , AGARTALA

In the result, all the grounds of appeal raised by the Revenue in ITA Nos

Bench: Dr.Manish Borad & Shri Manomohan Dasआयकर अपील सं. / Ita Nos.117 To 123/Gty/2018 िनधा"रण वष" / Assessment Years : 2008-09 To 2014-15 Dcit, Rajarshi Motors Pvt. Ltd., Circle Agartala A.A. Road, Chandrapur, Vs. Agartala, Tripura Pan : Aaccr8033P अपीलाथ" / Appellant ""यथ" / Respondent

68............................................................................Rs. 78,967/- Voluntary Disclosure 11. In course of search proceedings, Shri Swapan Kumar paul, Key person of the Swapan Kumar Paul group disclosed voluntarily Rs. 19,55,75,000/- as undisclosed income and submitted details of disclosure u/s. 132(4) as Annexure-2 of disclosure petition submitted on 10-12- 2013. According to his disclosure

DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE- AGARTALA , AGARTALA vs. RAJARSHI MOTORS PVT. LTD., AGARTALA

In the result, all the grounds of appeal raised by the Revenue in ITA Nos

Bench: Dr.Manish Borad & Shri Manomohan Dasआयकर अपील सं. / Ita Nos.117 To 123/Gty/2018 िनधा"रण वष" / Assessment Years : 2008-09 To 2014-15 Dcit, Rajarshi Motors Pvt. Ltd., Circle Agartala A.A. Road, Chandrapur, Vs. Agartala, Tripura Pan : Aaccr8033P अपीलाथ" / Appellant ""यथ" / Respondent

68............................................................................Rs. 78,967/- Voluntary Disclosure 11. In course of search proceedings, Shri Swapan Kumar paul, Key person of the Swapan Kumar Paul group disclosed voluntarily Rs. 19,55,75,000/- as undisclosed income and submitted details of disclosure u/s. 132(4) as Annexure-2 of disclosure petition submitted on 10-12- 2013. According to his disclosure

RAJARSHI MOTORS PVT. LTD.,AGARTALA vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE- AGARTALA , AGARTALA

In the result, all the grounds of appeal raised by the Revenue in ITA Nos

Bench: Dr.Manish Borad & Shri Manomohan Dasआयकर अपील सं. / Ita Nos.117 To 123/Gty/2018 िनधा"रण वष" / Assessment Years : 2008-09 To 2014-15 Dcit, Rajarshi Motors Pvt. Ltd., Circle Agartala A.A. Road, Chandrapur, Vs. Agartala, Tripura Pan : Aaccr8033P अपीलाथ" / Appellant ""यथ" / Respondent

68............................................................................Rs. 78,967/- Voluntary Disclosure 11. In course of search proceedings, Shri Swapan Kumar paul, Key person of the Swapan Kumar Paul group disclosed voluntarily Rs. 19,55,75,000/- as undisclosed income and submitted details of disclosure u/s. 132(4) as Annexure-2 of disclosure petition submitted on 10-12- 2013. According to his disclosure

RAJARSHI MOTORS PVT. LTD.,AGARTALA vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE- AGARTALA , AGARTALA

In the result, all the grounds of appeal raised by the Revenue in ITA Nos

Bench: Dr.Manish Borad & Shri Manomohan Dasआयकर अपील सं. / Ita Nos.117 To 123/Gty/2018 िनधा"रण वष" / Assessment Years : 2008-09 To 2014-15 Dcit, Rajarshi Motors Pvt. Ltd., Circle Agartala A.A. Road, Chandrapur, Vs. Agartala, Tripura Pan : Aaccr8033P अपीलाथ" / Appellant ""यथ" / Respondent

68............................................................................Rs. 78,967/- Voluntary Disclosure 11. In course of search proceedings, Shri Swapan Kumar paul, Key person of the Swapan Kumar Paul group disclosed voluntarily Rs. 19,55,75,000/- as undisclosed income and submitted details of disclosure u/s. 132(4) as Annexure-2 of disclosure petition submitted on 10-12- 2013. According to his disclosure

RAJARSHI MOTORS PVT. LTD.,AGARTALA vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE- AGARTALA , AGARTALA

In the result, all the grounds of appeal raised by the Revenue in ITA Nos

Bench: Dr.Manish Borad & Shri Manomohan Dasआयकर अपील सं. / Ita Nos.117 To 123/Gty/2018 िनधा"रण वष" / Assessment Years : 2008-09 To 2014-15 Dcit, Rajarshi Motors Pvt. Ltd., Circle Agartala A.A. Road, Chandrapur, Vs. Agartala, Tripura Pan : Aaccr8033P अपीलाथ" / Appellant ""यथ" / Respondent

68............................................................................Rs. 78,967/- Voluntary Disclosure 11. In course of search proceedings, Shri Swapan Kumar paul, Key person of the Swapan Kumar Paul group disclosed voluntarily Rs. 19,55,75,000/- as undisclosed income and submitted details of disclosure u/s. 132(4) as Annexure-2 of disclosure petition submitted on 10-12- 2013. According to his disclosure

DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE- AGARTALA , AGARTALA vs. RAJARSHI MOTORS PVT. LTD., AGARTALA

In the result, all the grounds of appeal raised by the Revenue in ITA Nos

Bench: Dr.Manish Borad & Shri Manomohan Dasआयकर अपील सं. / Ita Nos.117 To 123/Gty/2018 िनधा"रण वष" / Assessment Years : 2008-09 To 2014-15 Dcit, Rajarshi Motors Pvt. Ltd., Circle Agartala A.A. Road, Chandrapur, Vs. Agartala, Tripura Pan : Aaccr8033P अपीलाथ" / Appellant ""यथ" / Respondent

68............................................................................Rs. 78,967/- Voluntary Disclosure 11. In course of search proceedings, Shri Swapan Kumar paul, Key person of the Swapan Kumar Paul group disclosed voluntarily Rs. 19,55,75,000/- as undisclosed income and submitted details of disclosure u/s. 132(4) as Annexure-2 of disclosure petition submitted on 10-12- 2013. According to his disclosure

DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE- AGARTALA , AGARTALA vs. RAJARSHI MOTORS PVT. LTD., AGARTALA

In the result, all the grounds of appeal raised by the Revenue in ITA Nos

Bench: Dr.Manish Borad & Shri Manomohan Dasआयकर अपील सं. / Ita Nos.117 To 123/Gty/2018 िनधा"रण वष" / Assessment Years : 2008-09 To 2014-15 Dcit, Rajarshi Motors Pvt. Ltd., Circle Agartala A.A. Road, Chandrapur, Vs. Agartala, Tripura Pan : Aaccr8033P अपीलाथ" / Appellant ""यथ" / Respondent

68............................................................................Rs. 78,967/- Voluntary Disclosure 11. In course of search proceedings, Shri Swapan Kumar paul, Key person of the Swapan Kumar Paul group disclosed voluntarily Rs. 19,55,75,000/- as undisclosed income and submitted details of disclosure u/s. 132(4) as Annexure-2 of disclosure petition submitted on 10-12- 2013. According to his disclosure