BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

117 results for “section 68”+ Section 21(5)clear

Sorted by relevance

Delhi6,066Mumbai4,917Bangalore1,712Chennai1,204Ahmedabad1,118Kolkata1,060Jaipur993Hyderabad867Karnataka709Pune630Surat557Indore532Chandigarh523Raipur290Cochin284Visakhapatnam242Rajkot237Nagpur183Agra159Cuttack156Lucknow144Amritsar142Telangana125Guwahati117SC89Ranchi78Calcutta71Allahabad64Jodhpur63Patna50Panaji42Dehradun38Jabalpur34Varanasi21Orissa12Rajasthan11Kerala10A.K. SIKRI ROHINTON FALI NARIMAN4Uttarakhand3Gauhati2Punjab & Haryana1Andhra Pradesh1A.K. SIKRI N.V. RAMANA1Tripura1Himachal Pradesh1ASHOK BHAN DALVEER BHANDARI1K.S. RADHAKRISHNAN A.K. SIKRI1ANIL R. DAVE SHIVA KIRTI SINGH1

Key Topics

Addition to Income78Section 6873Section 153A73Section 25056Section 143(3)48Section 153C39Section 153D31Section 80I29Section 14728Disallowance

ACCRECENT WAY MARKETING (P) LTD.,GUWAHATI vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-3, GUWAHATI

ITA 358/GTY/2018[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Guwahati09 Jun 2025AY 2010-11

Bench: Shri Manomohan Das & Shri Rakesh Mishra

Section 142(1)Section 143(1)Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 251Section 68

Section 68 in this case is highly irregular and against the provisions of law. The Assessment Order may therefore be struck down as illegal. Ground 3: For that the Learned CIT(A) has failed to appreciate the facts and circumstances of the claim for deduction raised before her in regard to liability of 5,11,68,800/- which

ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-1, GUWAHATI vs. M/S. WINNER DEALTRADE (P) LTD.,, KOLKATA

Showing 1–20 of 117 · Page 1 of 6

26
Deduction18
Depreciation14

In the result, both the appeals of the Revenue are dismissed

ITA 13/GTY/2021[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Guwahati25 Sept 2023AY 2012-13

Bench: Dr. Manish Borad & Shri Sonjoy Sarma

Section 143(3)Section 68

68 of the Act during the course of original assessment proceedings. Subsequently re-assessment proceedings were initiated and reasons were recorded for reopening and the said reasons were only to examine the amount received by the assessee-company towards share capital and share premium. The ld. D.R. failed to rebut this fact that the issues, which have been thoroughly examined

ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-1, GUWAHATI vs. M/S. LINKSTAR PROMOTERS (P) LTD, KOLKATA

In the result, both the appeals of the Revenue are dismissed

ITA 9/GTY/2021[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Guwahati25 Sept 2023AY 2012-13

Bench: Dr. Manish Borad & Shri Sonjoy Sarma

Section 143(3)Section 68

68 of the Act during the course of original assessment proceedings. Subsequently re-assessment proceedings were initiated and reasons were recorded for reopening and the said reasons were only to examine the amount received by the assessee-company towards share capital and share premium. The ld. D.R. failed to rebut this fact that the issues, which have been thoroughly examined

D.C.I.T., CIRCLE-1, DIBRUGARH vs. BACHH RAJ BAMALWA, DIBRUGARH

In the result, all the appeals of the Revenue are dismissed and that of the Cross Objections of the assessees are allowed

ITA 53/GTY/2023[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Guwahati01 Sept 2023AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav, Vice-(Kz) & Shri Rajesh Kumar

5. As far as the remaining two assessees are concerned, Shri Vishal Bamalwa in his Cross Objection submitted that no authorisation of warrant is available in his case, therefore, no search was carried out upon him and if no search was carried out, then, assessment order under section 153A ought to have been quashed. ITA Nos. 51 to 66/GAU/2023

D.C.I.T., CIRCLE- 1, DIBRUGARH vs. BHAGWATI DEVII BAMALWA , DIBRUGARH

In the result, all the appeals of the Revenue are dismissed and that of the Cross Objections of the assessees are allowed

ITA 59/GTY/2023[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Guwahati01 Sept 2023AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav, Vice-(Kz) & Shri Rajesh Kumar

5. As far as the remaining two assessees are concerned, Shri Vishal Bamalwa in his Cross Objection submitted that no authorisation of warrant is available in his case, therefore, no search was carried out upon him and if no search was carried out, then, assessment order under section 153A ought to have been quashed. ITA Nos. 51 to 66/GAU/2023

D.C.I.T., CIRCLE-1, DIBRUGARH vs. BACHH RAJ BAMALWA, DIBRUGARH

In the result, all the appeals of the Revenue are dismissed and that of the Cross Objections of the assessees are allowed

ITA 54/GTY/2023[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Guwahati01 Sept 2023AY 2015-16

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav, Vice-(Kz) & Shri Rajesh Kumar

5. As far as the remaining two assessees are concerned, Shri Vishal Bamalwa in his Cross Objection submitted that no authorisation of warrant is available in his case, therefore, no search was carried out upon him and if no search was carried out, then, assessment order under section 153A ought to have been quashed. ITA Nos. 51 to 66/GAU/2023

DCIT, CIRCLE-1, DIBRUGARH vs. BAJRANG LAL BAMALWA, DIBRUGARH

In the result, all the appeals of the Revenue are dismissed and that of the Cross Objections of the assessees are allowed

ITA 51/GTY/2023[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Guwahati01 Sept 2023AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav, Vice-(Kz) & Shri Rajesh Kumar

5. As far as the remaining two assessees are concerned, Shri Vishal Bamalwa in his Cross Objection submitted that no authorisation of warrant is available in his case, therefore, no search was carried out upon him and if no search was carried out, then, assessment order under section 153A ought to have been quashed. ITA Nos. 51 to 66/GAU/2023

D.C.I.T., CIRCLE- 1, DIBRUGARH vs. HANS RAJ BAMALWA (HUF), DIBRUGARH

In the result, all the appeals of the Revenue are dismissed and that of the Cross Objections of the assessees are allowed

ITA 56/GTY/2023[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Guwahati01 Sept 2023AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav, Vice-(Kz) & Shri Rajesh Kumar

5. As far as the remaining two assessees are concerned, Shri Vishal Bamalwa in his Cross Objection submitted that no authorisation of warrant is available in his case, therefore, no search was carried out upon him and if no search was carried out, then, assessment order under section 153A ought to have been quashed. ITA Nos. 51 to 66/GAU/2023

DCIT, CIRCLE-1, DIBRUGARH vs. BAJRANG LAL BAMALWA, DIBRUGARH

In the result, all the appeals of the Revenue are dismissed and that of the Cross Objections of the assessees are allowed

ITA 52/GTY/2023[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Guwahati01 Sept 2023AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav, Vice-(Kz) & Shri Rajesh Kumar

5. As far as the remaining two assessees are concerned, Shri Vishal Bamalwa in his Cross Objection submitted that no authorisation of warrant is available in his case, therefore, no search was carried out upon him and if no search was carried out, then, assessment order under section 153A ought to have been quashed. ITA Nos. 51 to 66/GAU/2023

D.C.I.T., CIRCLE- 1, DIBRUGARH vs. MEENAKSHI BAMALWA SONI, DIBRUGARH

In the result, all the appeals of the Revenue are dismissed and that of the Cross Objections of the assessees are allowed

ITA 58/GTY/2023[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Guwahati01 Sept 2023AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav, Vice-(Kz) & Shri Rajesh Kumar

5. As far as the remaining two assessees are concerned, Shri Vishal Bamalwa in his Cross Objection submitted that no authorisation of warrant is available in his case, therefore, no search was carried out upon him and if no search was carried out, then, assessment order under section 153A ought to have been quashed. ITA Nos. 51 to 66/GAU/2023

D.C.I.T., CIRCLE-1, DIBRUGARH vs. SHEETAL BAMALWA, DIBRUGARH

In the result, all the appeals of the Revenue are dismissed and that of the Cross Objections of the assessees are allowed

ITA 64/GTY/2023[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Guwahati01 Sept 2023AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav, Vice-(Kz) & Shri Rajesh Kumar

5. As far as the remaining two assessees are concerned, Shri Vishal Bamalwa in his Cross Objection submitted that no authorisation of warrant is available in his case, therefore, no search was carried out upon him and if no search was carried out, then, assessment order under section 153A ought to have been quashed. ITA Nos. 51 to 66/GAU/2023

D.C.I.T., CIRCLE- 1, DIBRUGARH vs. VISHAL BAMALWA , DIBRUGARH

In the result, all the appeals of the Revenue are dismissed and that of the Cross Objections of the assessees are allowed

ITA 60/GTY/2023[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Guwahati01 Sept 2023AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav, Vice-(Kz) & Shri Rajesh Kumar

5. As far as the remaining two assessees are concerned, Shri Vishal Bamalwa in his Cross Objection submitted that no authorisation of warrant is available in his case, therefore, no search was carried out upon him and if no search was carried out, then, assessment order under section 153A ought to have been quashed. ITA Nos. 51 to 66/GAU/2023

D.C.I.T., CIRCLE-1, DIBRUGARH vs. VINAY BAMALWA, DIBRUGARH

In the result, all the appeals of the Revenue are dismissed and that of the Cross Objections of the assessees are allowed

ITA 61/GTY/2023[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Guwahati01 Sept 2023AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav, Vice-(Kz) & Shri Rajesh Kumar

5. As far as the remaining two assessees are concerned, Shri Vishal Bamalwa in his Cross Objection submitted that no authorisation of warrant is available in his case, therefore, no search was carried out upon him and if no search was carried out, then, assessment order under section 153A ought to have been quashed. ITA Nos. 51 to 66/GAU/2023

D.C.I.T., CIRCLE-1, DIBRUGARH vs. RAVI BAMALWA, DIBRUGARH

In the result, all the appeals of the Revenue are dismissed and that of the Cross Objections of the assessees are allowed

ITA 62/GTY/2023[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Guwahati01 Sept 2023AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav, Vice-(Kz) & Shri Rajesh Kumar

5. As far as the remaining two assessees are concerned, Shri Vishal Bamalwa in his Cross Objection submitted that no authorisation of warrant is available in his case, therefore, no search was carried out upon him and if no search was carried out, then, assessment order under section 153A ought to have been quashed. ITA Nos. 51 to 66/GAU/2023

D.C.I.T., CIRCLE-1, DIBRUGARH vs. MADAN LAL BAMALWA, DIBRUGARH

In the result, all the appeals of the Revenue are dismissed and that of the Cross Objections of the assessees are allowed

ITA 63/GTY/2023[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Guwahati01 Sept 2023AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav, Vice-(Kz) & Shri Rajesh Kumar

5. As far as the remaining two assessees are concerned, Shri Vishal Bamalwa in his Cross Objection submitted that no authorisation of warrant is available in his case, therefore, no search was carried out upon him and if no search was carried out, then, assessment order under section 153A ought to have been quashed. ITA Nos. 51 to 66/GAU/2023

D.C.I.T., CIRCLE- 1, DIBRUGARH vs. HANS RAJ BAMALWA, DIBRUGARH

In the result, all the appeals of the Revenue are dismissed and that of the Cross Objections of the assessees are allowed

ITA 55/GTY/2023[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Guwahati01 Sept 2023AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav, Vice-(Kz) & Shri Rajesh Kumar

5. As far as the remaining two assessees are concerned, Shri Vishal Bamalwa in his Cross Objection submitted that no authorisation of warrant is available in his case, therefore, no search was carried out upon him and if no search was carried out, then, assessment order under section 153A ought to have been quashed. ITA Nos. 51 to 66/GAU/2023

D.C.I.T., CIRCLE-1, DIBRUGARH vs. PRAMOD KUMAR BAMALWA, DIBRUGARH

In the result, all the appeals of the Revenue are dismissed and that of the Cross Objections of the assessees are allowed

ITA 65/GTY/2023[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Guwahati01 Sept 2023AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav, Vice-(Kz) & Shri Rajesh Kumar

5. As far as the remaining two assessees are concerned, Shri Vishal Bamalwa in his Cross Objection submitted that no authorisation of warrant is available in his case, therefore, no search was carried out upon him and if no search was carried out, then, assessment order under section 153A ought to have been quashed. ITA Nos. 51 to 66/GAU/2023

D.C.I.T., CIRCLE-1, DIBRUGARH vs. VINOD BAMALWA, DIBRUGARH

In the result, all the appeals of the Revenue are dismissed and that of the Cross Objections of the assessees are allowed

ITA 66/GTY/2023[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Guwahati01 Sept 2023AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav, Vice-(Kz) & Shri Rajesh Kumar

5. As far as the remaining two assessees are concerned, Shri Vishal Bamalwa in his Cross Objection submitted that no authorisation of warrant is available in his case, therefore, no search was carried out upon him and if no search was carried out, then, assessment order under section 153A ought to have been quashed. ITA Nos. 51 to 66/GAU/2023

D.C.I.T., CIRCLE- 1, DIBRUGARH vs. USHA BAMALWA, DIBRUGARH

In the result, all the appeals of the Revenue are dismissed and that of the Cross Objections of the assessees are allowed

ITA 57/GTY/2023[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Guwahati01 Sept 2023AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav, Vice-(Kz) & Shri Rajesh Kumar

5. As far as the remaining two assessees are concerned, Shri Vishal Bamalwa in his Cross Objection submitted that no authorisation of warrant is available in his case, therefore, no search was carried out upon him and if no search was carried out, then, assessment order under section 153A ought to have been quashed. ITA Nos. 51 to 66/GAU/2023

DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE- 3, GUWAHATI vs. M/S. SATYAM ISPAT (NORTH EAST) LIMITED, BANDERDEWA

In the result, the appeals filed by the Revenue for AY 2011-

ITA 86/GTY/2017[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Guwahati03 Mar 2023AY 2011-12

Bench: Sri Rajpal Yadav(Kz) & Dr. Manish Borad

Section 132Section 133(6)Section 139Section 143(2)Section 153CSection 250Section 68Section 80I

Section 68 of the Act.” 11.3. Hon'ble Supreme Court, thus, held that once the assessee has submitted the documents relating to identity, genuineness of the transaction, and credit-worthiness of the subscribers, then, AO is duty bound to conduct an independent enquiry to verify the same. However, as noted above, ld. AO in this case has not made