ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-1, GUWAHATI vs. M/S. WINNER DEALTRADE (P) LTD.,, KOLKATA

In the result, both the appeals of the Revenue are dismissed

Bench: Dr. Manish Borad & Shri Sonjoy Sarma

3) of the Act subsequent to filing of their return of income for A.Y. 2012-13. It is not in dispute that thorough examination of all the share applicants have been carried out by the ld. Assessing Officer during the course of original assessment proceedings. Notices under section 133(6) of the Act were sent to all the share

ACCRECENT WAY MARKETING (P) LTD.,GUWAHATI vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-3, GUWAHATI

Bench: Shri Manomohan Das & Shri Rakesh Mishra

Section 68 in this case is highly irregular and against the provisions of law. The Assessment Order may therefore be struck down as illegal. Ground 3: For that the Learned CIT(A) has failed to appreciate the facts and circumstances of the claim for deduction raised before her in regard to liability of 5,11,68,800/- which

ABCI INFRASTRUCTURES PRIVATE LIMITED,KOLKATA vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1, GUWAHATI

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed, whereas the appeal of the Revenue is dismissed

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav, Vice-(Kz) & Dr. Manish Borad

20,75,870/-. The case of the assessee was selected for scrutiny assessment under CASS and a notice under section 143(2) was issued and served upon the assessee. The ld. Assessing Officer has passed the assessment order on 30.03.2016 under section 143(3) of the Income Tax Act. The ld. Assessing Officer had determined the income

ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1, GUWAHATI vs. ABCI INFRASTRUCTURES PRIVATE LIMITED, KOLKATA

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed, whereas the appeal of the Revenue is dismissed

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav, Vice-(Kz) & Dr. Manish Borad

20,75,870/-. The case of the assessee was selected for scrutiny assessment under CASS and a notice under section 143(2) was issued and served upon the assessee. The ld. Assessing Officer has passed the assessment order on 30.03.2016 under section 143(3) of the Income Tax Act. The ld. Assessing Officer had determined the income

AGRIM INFRAPROJECT PRIVATE LIMITED,GUWAHATI vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-3, GUWAHATI

In the result, this appeal of the assessee i

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav, Vice-(Kz) & Dr. Manish Borad

68 of I.T. Act, 1961 without appreciating the fact of the case mentioned in Form No. 35 itself. 3. In ITA No. 224/GAU/2019, the assessee has raised the following ground :- Assessment Years: 2012-2013, 2015-16, 2012-13 Agrim Infraproject Private Limited “That the ld. CIT(Appeals) was not justified while confirming addition of Rs.2,07,20,125/- without properly

AGRIM INFRAPROJECT PRIVATE LIMITED,GUWAHATI vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-3, GUWAHATI

In the result, this appeal of the assessee i

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav, Vice-(Kz) & Dr. Manish Borad

68 of I.T. Act, 1961 without appreciating the fact of the case mentioned in Form No. 35 itself. 3. In ITA No. 224/GAU/2019, the assessee has raised the following ground :- Assessment Years: 2012-2013, 2015-16, 2012-13 Agrim Infraproject Private Limited “That the ld. CIT(Appeals) was not justified while confirming addition of Rs.2,07,20,125/- without properly

AGRIM INFRAPROJECT PRIVATE LIMITED,GUWAHATI vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-3, GUWAHATI

In the result, this appeal of the assessee i

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav, Vice-(Kz) & Dr. Manish Borad

68 of I.T. Act, 1961 without appreciating the fact of the case mentioned in Form No. 35 itself. 3. In ITA No. 224/GAU/2019, the assessee has raised the following ground :- Assessment Years: 2012-2013, 2015-16, 2012-13 Agrim Infraproject Private Limited “That the ld. CIT(Appeals) was not justified while confirming addition of Rs.2,07,20,125/- without properly

DCIT, CIRCLE-1, DIBRUGARH vs. BAJRANG LAL BAMALWA, DIBRUGARH

In the result, all the appeals of the Revenue are dismissed and that of the Cross Objections of the assessees are allowed

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav, Vice-(Kz) & Shri Rajesh Kumar

68 1 BAJRANG LAL 2012-13 Twenty First Century 4,76,18,448 PB-1 BAMALWA India Ltd. 2 BAJRANG LAL 2013-14 Twenty First Century 3,79,39,430 PB-2 BAMALWA India Ltd. (Clubbed income of Minor Son RohitBamalwa) 3 BACHH RAJ 2012-13 Twenty First Century 9,52,37,280 PB-3 BAMALWA India Ltd. (Self

D.C.I.T., CIRCLE- 1, DIBRUGARH vs. USHA BAMALWA, DIBRUGARH

In the result, all the appeals of the Revenue are dismissed and that of the Cross Objections of the assessees are allowed

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav, Vice-(Kz) & Shri Rajesh Kumar

68 1 BAJRANG LAL 2012-13 Twenty First Century 4,76,18,448 PB-1 BAMALWA India Ltd. 2 BAJRANG LAL 2013-14 Twenty First Century 3,79,39,430 PB-2 BAMALWA India Ltd. (Clubbed income of Minor Son RohitBamalwa) 3 BACHH RAJ 2012-13 Twenty First Century 9,52,37,280 PB-3 BAMALWA India Ltd. (Self

DCIT, CIRCLE-1, DIBRUGARH vs. BAJRANG LAL BAMALWA, DIBRUGARH

In the result, all the appeals of the Revenue are dismissed and that of the Cross Objections of the assessees are allowed

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav, Vice-(Kz) & Shri Rajesh Kumar

68 1 BAJRANG LAL 2012-13 Twenty First Century 4,76,18,448 PB-1 BAMALWA India Ltd. 2 BAJRANG LAL 2013-14 Twenty First Century 3,79,39,430 PB-2 BAMALWA India Ltd. (Clubbed income of Minor Son RohitBamalwa) 3 BACHH RAJ 2012-13 Twenty First Century 9,52,37,280 PB-3 BAMALWA India Ltd. (Self

D.C.I.T., CIRCLE- 1, DIBRUGARH vs. MEENAKSHI BAMALWA SONI, DIBRUGARH

In the result, all the appeals of the Revenue are dismissed and that of the Cross Objections of the assessees are allowed

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav, Vice-(Kz) & Shri Rajesh Kumar

68 1 BAJRANG LAL 2012-13 Twenty First Century 4,76,18,448 PB-1 BAMALWA India Ltd. 2 BAJRANG LAL 2013-14 Twenty First Century 3,79,39,430 PB-2 BAMALWA India Ltd. (Clubbed income of Minor Son RohitBamalwa) 3 BACHH RAJ 2012-13 Twenty First Century 9,52,37,280 PB-3 BAMALWA India Ltd. (Self

D.C.I.T., CIRCLE- 1, DIBRUGARH vs. BHAGWATI DEVII BAMALWA , DIBRUGARH

In the result, all the appeals of the Revenue are dismissed and that of the Cross Objections of the assessees are allowed

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav, Vice-(Kz) & Shri Rajesh Kumar

68 1 BAJRANG LAL 2012-13 Twenty First Century 4,76,18,448 PB-1 BAMALWA India Ltd. 2 BAJRANG LAL 2013-14 Twenty First Century 3,79,39,430 PB-2 BAMALWA India Ltd. (Clubbed income of Minor Son RohitBamalwa) 3 BACHH RAJ 2012-13 Twenty First Century 9,52,37,280 PB-3 BAMALWA India Ltd. (Self

D.C.I.T., CIRCLE- 1, DIBRUGARH vs. VISHAL BAMALWA , DIBRUGARH

In the result, all the appeals of the Revenue are dismissed and that of the Cross Objections of the assessees are allowed

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav, Vice-(Kz) & Shri Rajesh Kumar

68 1 BAJRANG LAL 2012-13 Twenty First Century 4,76,18,448 PB-1 BAMALWA India Ltd. 2 BAJRANG LAL 2013-14 Twenty First Century 3,79,39,430 PB-2 BAMALWA India Ltd. (Clubbed income of Minor Son RohitBamalwa) 3 BACHH RAJ 2012-13 Twenty First Century 9,52,37,280 PB-3 BAMALWA India Ltd. (Self

D.C.I.T., CIRCLE- 1, DIBRUGARH vs. HANS RAJ BAMALWA (HUF), DIBRUGARH

In the result, all the appeals of the Revenue are dismissed and that of the Cross Objections of the assessees are allowed

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav, Vice-(Kz) & Shri Rajesh Kumar

68 1 BAJRANG LAL 2012-13 Twenty First Century 4,76,18,448 PB-1 BAMALWA India Ltd. 2 BAJRANG LAL 2013-14 Twenty First Century 3,79,39,430 PB-2 BAMALWA India Ltd. (Clubbed income of Minor Son RohitBamalwa) 3 BACHH RAJ 2012-13 Twenty First Century 9,52,37,280 PB-3 BAMALWA India Ltd. (Self

D.C.I.T., CIRCLE-1, DIBRUGARH vs. PRAMOD KUMAR BAMALWA, DIBRUGARH

In the result, all the appeals of the Revenue are dismissed and that of the Cross Objections of the assessees are allowed

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav, Vice-(Kz) & Shri Rajesh Kumar

68 1 BAJRANG LAL 2012-13 Twenty First Century 4,76,18,448 PB-1 BAMALWA India Ltd. 2 BAJRANG LAL 2013-14 Twenty First Century 3,79,39,430 PB-2 BAMALWA India Ltd. (Clubbed income of Minor Son RohitBamalwa) 3 BACHH RAJ 2012-13 Twenty First Century 9,52,37,280 PB-3 BAMALWA India Ltd. (Self

D.C.I.T., CIRCLE- 1, DIBRUGARH vs. HANS RAJ BAMALWA, DIBRUGARH

In the result, all the appeals of the Revenue are dismissed and that of the Cross Objections of the assessees are allowed

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav, Vice-(Kz) & Shri Rajesh Kumar

68 1 BAJRANG LAL 2012-13 Twenty First Century 4,76,18,448 PB-1 BAMALWA India Ltd. 2 BAJRANG LAL 2013-14 Twenty First Century 3,79,39,430 PB-2 BAMALWA India Ltd. (Clubbed income of Minor Son RohitBamalwa) 3 BACHH RAJ 2012-13 Twenty First Century 9,52,37,280 PB-3 BAMALWA India Ltd. (Self

D.C.I.T., CIRCLE-1, DIBRUGARH vs. SHEETAL BAMALWA, DIBRUGARH

In the result, all the appeals of the Revenue are dismissed and that of the Cross Objections of the assessees are allowed

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav, Vice-(Kz) & Shri Rajesh Kumar

68 1 BAJRANG LAL 2012-13 Twenty First Century 4,76,18,448 PB-1 BAMALWA India Ltd. 2 BAJRANG LAL 2013-14 Twenty First Century 3,79,39,430 PB-2 BAMALWA India Ltd. (Clubbed income of Minor Son RohitBamalwa) 3 BACHH RAJ 2012-13 Twenty First Century 9,52,37,280 PB-3 BAMALWA India Ltd. (Self

D.C.I.T., CIRCLE-1, DIBRUGARH vs. MADAN LAL BAMALWA, DIBRUGARH

In the result, all the appeals of the Revenue are dismissed and that of the Cross Objections of the assessees are allowed

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav, Vice-(Kz) & Shri Rajesh Kumar

68 1 BAJRANG LAL 2012-13 Twenty First Century 4,76,18,448 PB-1 BAMALWA India Ltd. 2 BAJRANG LAL 2013-14 Twenty First Century 3,79,39,430 PB-2 BAMALWA India Ltd. (Clubbed income of Minor Son RohitBamalwa) 3 BACHH RAJ 2012-13 Twenty First Century 9,52,37,280 PB-3 BAMALWA India Ltd. (Self