BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

49 results for “section 68”+ Section 2(24)(x)clear

Sorted by relevance

Delhi1,634Mumbai1,065Karnataka566Bangalore383Jaipur326Kolkata307Ahmedabad279Chennai200Chandigarh179Hyderabad152Indore102Pune92Surat78Agra76Raipur67Cochin60Calcutta55Nagpur52Guwahati49Telangana49Lucknow48Visakhapatnam44Rajkot41Cuttack26SC19Jodhpur18Allahabad17Amritsar9Varanasi8Rajasthan7Jabalpur6Orissa4Ranchi4Dehradun3Panaji2Patna2Gauhati1

Key Topics

Section 143(1)59Section 153C33Addition to Income33Section 80I25Section 25023Section 15421Disallowance20Section 143(3)14Depreciation14Section 68

GREENWOOD RESORTS PRIVATE LIMITED,GUWAHATI vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, GUWAHATI

In the result, ITA No. 114/GTY/2024 for AY 2017-18 is partly allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 118/GTY/2024[2021-22]Status: DisposedITAT Guwahati29 May 2025AY 2021-22

Bench: Shri Manomohan Das & Shri Rakesh Mishra

Section 153CSection 250Section 36Section 40A(3)Section 68

X) for assessing the difference of actual consideration and FMV but said section has been incorporated in the Act by F Act 2017 w.e.f. 1/4/2017 but the transactions has took place earlier. 7. That Sir, from the above it is quite clear that one part of satisfaction note is on Survey proceeding and other part is in respect

GREENWOOD RESORTS PRIVATE LIMITED,GUWAHATI vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, GUWAHATI

Showing 1–20 of 49 · Page 1 of 3

10
Section 40A(3)9
Rectification u/s 1548

In the result, ITA No. 114/GTY/2024 for AY 2017-18 is partly allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 115/GTY/2024[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Guwahati29 May 2025AY 2018-19

Bench: Shri Manomohan Das & Shri Rakesh Mishra

Section 153CSection 250Section 36Section 40A(3)Section 68

X) for assessing the difference of actual consideration and FMV but said section has been incorporated in the Act by F Act 2017 w.e.f. 1/4/2017 but the transactions has took place earlier. 7. That Sir, from the above it is quite clear that one part of satisfaction note is on Survey proceeding and other part is in respect

GREENWOOD RESORTS PRIVATE LIMITED,GUWAHATI vs. ACIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1, GUWAHATI

In the result, ITA No. 114/GTY/2024 for AY 2017-18 is partly allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 112/GTY/2024[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Guwahati29 May 2025AY 2015-16

Bench: Shri Manomohan Das & Shri Rakesh Mishra

Section 153CSection 250Section 36Section 40A(3)Section 68

X) for assessing the difference of actual consideration and FMV but said section has been incorporated in the Act by F Act 2017 w.e.f. 1/4/2017 but the transactions has took place earlier. 7. That Sir, from the above it is quite clear that one part of satisfaction note is on Survey proceeding and other part is in respect

GREENWOOD RESORTS PRIVATE LIMITED,GUWAHATI vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, GUWAHATI

In the result, ITA No. 114/GTY/2024 for AY 2017-18 is partly allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 114/GTY/2024[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Guwahati29 May 2025AY 2017-18

Bench: Shri Manomohan Das & Shri Rakesh Mishra

Section 153CSection 250Section 36Section 40A(3)Section 68

X) for assessing the difference of actual consideration and FMV but said section has been incorporated in the Act by F Act 2017 w.e.f. 1/4/2017 but the transactions has took place earlier. 7. That Sir, from the above it is quite clear that one part of satisfaction note is on Survey proceeding and other part is in respect

GREENWOOD RESORTS PRIVATE LIMITED,GUWAHATI vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, GUWAHATI

In the result, ITA No. 114/GTY/2024 for AY 2017-18 is partly allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 110/GTY/2024[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Guwahati29 May 2025AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri Manomohan Das & Shri Rakesh Mishra

Section 153CSection 250Section 36Section 40A(3)Section 68

X) for assessing the difference of actual consideration and FMV but said section has been incorporated in the Act by F Act 2017 w.e.f. 1/4/2017 but the transactions has took place earlier. 7. That Sir, from the above it is quite clear that one part of satisfaction note is on Survey proceeding and other part is in respect

GREENWOOD RESORTS PRIVATE LIMITED,GUWAHATI vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, GUWAHATI

In the result, ITA No. 114/GTY/2024 for AY 2017-18 is partly allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 113/GTY/2024[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Guwahati29 May 2025AY 2017-18

Bench: Shri Manomohan Das & Shri Rakesh Mishra

Section 153CSection 250Section 36Section 40A(3)Section 68

X) for assessing the difference of actual consideration and FMV but said section has been incorporated in the Act by F Act 2017 w.e.f. 1/4/2017 but the transactions has took place earlier. 7. That Sir, from the above it is quite clear that one part of satisfaction note is on Survey proceeding and other part is in respect

GREENWOOD RESORTS PRIVATE LIMITED,GUWAHATI vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, GUWAHATI

In the result, ITA No. 114/GTY/2024 for AY 2017-18 is partly allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 116/GTY/2024[2019-20]Status: DisposedITAT Guwahati29 May 2025AY 2019-20

Bench: Shri Manomohan Das & Shri Rakesh Mishra

Section 153CSection 250Section 36Section 40A(3)Section 68

X) for assessing the difference of actual consideration and FMV but said section has been incorporated in the Act by F Act 2017 w.e.f. 1/4/2017 but the transactions has took place earlier. 7. That Sir, from the above it is quite clear that one part of satisfaction note is on Survey proceeding and other part is in respect

GREENWOOD RESORTS PRIVATE LIMITED,GUWAHATI vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, GUWAHATI

In the result, ITA No. 114/GTY/2024 for AY 2017-18 is partly allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 117/GTY/2024[2020-21]Status: DisposedITAT Guwahati29 May 2025AY 2020-21

Bench: Shri Manomohan Das & Shri Rakesh Mishra

Section 153CSection 250Section 36Section 40A(3)Section 68

X) for assessing the difference of actual consideration and FMV but said section has been incorporated in the Act by F Act 2017 w.e.f. 1/4/2017 but the transactions has took place earlier. 7. That Sir, from the above it is quite clear that one part of satisfaction note is on Survey proceeding and other part is in respect

GREENWOOD RESORTS PRIVATE LIMITED,GUWAHATI vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, GUWAHATI

In the result, ITA No. 114/GTY/2024 for AY 2017-18 is partly allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 111/GTY/2024[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Guwahati29 May 2025AY 2016-17

Bench: Shri Manomohan Das & Shri Rakesh Mishra

Section 153CSection 250Section 36Section 40A(3)Section 68

X) for assessing the difference of actual consideration and FMV but said section has been incorporated in the Act by F Act 2017 w.e.f. 1/4/2017 but the transactions has took place earlier. 7. That Sir, from the above it is quite clear that one part of satisfaction note is on Survey proceeding and other part is in respect

D.C.I.T., CIRCLE- 1, DIBRUGARH vs. HANS RAJ BAMALWA (HUF), DIBRUGARH

In the result, all the appeals of the Revenue are dismissed and that of the Cross Objections of the assessees are allowed

ITA 56/GTY/2023[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Guwahati01 Sept 2023AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav, Vice-(Kz) & Shri Rajesh Kumar

x) That the Assessee did not know the alleged operators of the company and had nothing to do with them. (xi) In rebuttal to the alleged circumstantial evidence/direct evidence against his claim of LTCG, the Assessee submitted as under: (a) With respect to the alleged statements of Sri Anil Khemka and Sri Rajendra Bubna, the Assessee categorically denied knowing them

DCIT, CIRCLE-1, DIBRUGARH vs. BAJRANG LAL BAMALWA, DIBRUGARH

In the result, all the appeals of the Revenue are dismissed and that of the Cross Objections of the assessees are allowed

ITA 52/GTY/2023[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Guwahati01 Sept 2023AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav, Vice-(Kz) & Shri Rajesh Kumar

x) That the Assessee did not know the alleged operators of the company and had nothing to do with them. (xi) In rebuttal to the alleged circumstantial evidence/direct evidence against his claim of LTCG, the Assessee submitted as under: (a) With respect to the alleged statements of Sri Anil Khemka and Sri Rajendra Bubna, the Assessee categorically denied knowing them

D.C.I.T., CIRCLE- 1, DIBRUGARH vs. HANS RAJ BAMALWA, DIBRUGARH

In the result, all the appeals of the Revenue are dismissed and that of the Cross Objections of the assessees are allowed

ITA 55/GTY/2023[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Guwahati01 Sept 2023AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav, Vice-(Kz) & Shri Rajesh Kumar

x) That the Assessee did not know the alleged operators of the company and had nothing to do with them. (xi) In rebuttal to the alleged circumstantial evidence/direct evidence against his claim of LTCG, the Assessee submitted as under: (a) With respect to the alleged statements of Sri Anil Khemka and Sri Rajendra Bubna, the Assessee categorically denied knowing them

DCIT, CIRCLE-1, DIBRUGARH vs. BAJRANG LAL BAMALWA, DIBRUGARH

In the result, all the appeals of the Revenue are dismissed and that of the Cross Objections of the assessees are allowed

ITA 51/GTY/2023[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Guwahati01 Sept 2023AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav, Vice-(Kz) & Shri Rajesh Kumar

x) That the Assessee did not know the alleged operators of the company and had nothing to do with them. (xi) In rebuttal to the alleged circumstantial evidence/direct evidence against his claim of LTCG, the Assessee submitted as under: (a) With respect to the alleged statements of Sri Anil Khemka and Sri Rajendra Bubna, the Assessee categorically denied knowing them

D.C.I.T., CIRCLE-1, DIBRUGARH vs. BACHH RAJ BAMALWA, DIBRUGARH

In the result, all the appeals of the Revenue are dismissed and that of the Cross Objections of the assessees are allowed

ITA 54/GTY/2023[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Guwahati01 Sept 2023AY 2015-16

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav, Vice-(Kz) & Shri Rajesh Kumar

x) That the Assessee did not know the alleged operators of the company and had nothing to do with them. (xi) In rebuttal to the alleged circumstantial evidence/direct evidence against his claim of LTCG, the Assessee submitted as under: (a) With respect to the alleged statements of Sri Anil Khemka and Sri Rajendra Bubna, the Assessee categorically denied knowing them

D.C.I.T., CIRCLE-1, DIBRUGARH vs. RAVI BAMALWA, DIBRUGARH

In the result, all the appeals of the Revenue are dismissed and that of the Cross Objections of the assessees are allowed

ITA 62/GTY/2023[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Guwahati01 Sept 2023AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav, Vice-(Kz) & Shri Rajesh Kumar

x) That the Assessee did not know the alleged operators of the company and had nothing to do with them. (xi) In rebuttal to the alleged circumstantial evidence/direct evidence against his claim of LTCG, the Assessee submitted as under: (a) With respect to the alleged statements of Sri Anil Khemka and Sri Rajendra Bubna, the Assessee categorically denied knowing them

D.C.I.T., CIRCLE-1, DIBRUGARH vs. VINOD BAMALWA, DIBRUGARH

In the result, all the appeals of the Revenue are dismissed and that of the Cross Objections of the assessees are allowed

ITA 66/GTY/2023[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Guwahati01 Sept 2023AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav, Vice-(Kz) & Shri Rajesh Kumar

x) That the Assessee did not know the alleged operators of the company and had nothing to do with them. (xi) In rebuttal to the alleged circumstantial evidence/direct evidence against his claim of LTCG, the Assessee submitted as under: (a) With respect to the alleged statements of Sri Anil Khemka and Sri Rajendra Bubna, the Assessee categorically denied knowing them

D.C.I.T., CIRCLE- 1, DIBRUGARH vs. MEENAKSHI BAMALWA SONI, DIBRUGARH

In the result, all the appeals of the Revenue are dismissed and that of the Cross Objections of the assessees are allowed

ITA 58/GTY/2023[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Guwahati01 Sept 2023AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav, Vice-(Kz) & Shri Rajesh Kumar

x) That the Assessee did not know the alleged operators of the company and had nothing to do with them. (xi) In rebuttal to the alleged circumstantial evidence/direct evidence against his claim of LTCG, the Assessee submitted as under: (a) With respect to the alleged statements of Sri Anil Khemka and Sri Rajendra Bubna, the Assessee categorically denied knowing them

D.C.I.T., CIRCLE-1, DIBRUGARH vs. BACHH RAJ BAMALWA, DIBRUGARH

In the result, all the appeals of the Revenue are dismissed and that of the Cross Objections of the assessees are allowed

ITA 53/GTY/2023[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Guwahati01 Sept 2023AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav, Vice-(Kz) & Shri Rajesh Kumar

x) That the Assessee did not know the alleged operators of the company and had nothing to do with them. (xi) In rebuttal to the alleged circumstantial evidence/direct evidence against his claim of LTCG, the Assessee submitted as under: (a) With respect to the alleged statements of Sri Anil Khemka and Sri Rajendra Bubna, the Assessee categorically denied knowing them

D.C.I.T., CIRCLE- 1, DIBRUGARH vs. USHA BAMALWA, DIBRUGARH

In the result, all the appeals of the Revenue are dismissed and that of the Cross Objections of the assessees are allowed

ITA 57/GTY/2023[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Guwahati01 Sept 2023AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav, Vice-(Kz) & Shri Rajesh Kumar

x) That the Assessee did not know the alleged operators of the company and had nothing to do with them. (xi) In rebuttal to the alleged circumstantial evidence/direct evidence against his claim of LTCG, the Assessee submitted as under: (a) With respect to the alleged statements of Sri Anil Khemka and Sri Rajendra Bubna, the Assessee categorically denied knowing them

D.C.I.T., CIRCLE-1, DIBRUGARH vs. MADAN LAL BAMALWA, DIBRUGARH

In the result, all the appeals of the Revenue are dismissed and that of the Cross Objections of the assessees are allowed

ITA 63/GTY/2023[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Guwahati01 Sept 2023AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav, Vice-(Kz) & Shri Rajesh Kumar

x) That the Assessee did not know the alleged operators of the company and had nothing to do with them. (xi) In rebuttal to the alleged circumstantial evidence/direct evidence against his claim of LTCG, the Assessee submitted as under: (a) With respect to the alleged statements of Sri Anil Khemka and Sri Rajendra Bubna, the Assessee categorically denied knowing them