BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

64 results for “section 68”+ Section 2(24)(vi)clear

Sorted by relevance

Delhi2,400Mumbai1,830Bangalore802Karnataka599Jaipur493Ahmedabad410Kolkata363Chennai307Hyderabad280Chandigarh214Indore197Cochin196Pune124Surat119Rajkot94Nagpur87Cuttack81Raipur77Visakhapatnam72Guwahati64Lucknow64Calcutta62Telangana46SC42Amritsar34Panaji32Agra26Dehradun17Allahabad16Patna15Jodhpur15Varanasi11Ranchi8Kerala7Rajasthan6Orissa5Jabalpur5Gauhati2Punjab & Haryana1Andhra Pradesh1

Key Topics

Addition to Income48Section 143(3)41Section 153C38Section 6835Section 25032Section 80I29Disallowance24Section 153A23Deduction21Section 147

D.C.I.T., CIRCLE- 1, DIBRUGARH vs. BHAGWATI DEVII BAMALWA , DIBRUGARH

In the result, all the appeals of the Revenue are dismissed and that of the Cross Objections of the assessees are allowed

ITA 59/GTY/2023[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Guwahati01 Sept 2023AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav, Vice-(Kz) & Shri Rajesh Kumar

vi) That he was not aware of any organized racket of any operators involved in the generation of bogus LTCG as alleged by the A.O. CO Nos. 6 to 21/GAU/2023 (in ITA Nos. 51 to 66/GAU/2023) (vii) That the price escalation in shares was due to the order of the Hon’ble Calcutta High Court for amalgamation, which was passed

D.C.I.T., CIRCLE-1, DIBRUGARH vs. BACHH RAJ BAMALWA, DIBRUGARH

In the result, all the appeals of the Revenue are dismissed and that of the Cross Objections of the assessees are allowed

ITA 53/GTY/2023[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Guwahati01 Sept 2023AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav, Vice-(Kz) & Shri Rajesh Kumar

vi) That he was not aware of any organized racket of any operators involved in the generation of bogus LTCG as alleged by the A.O. CO Nos. 6 to 21/GAU/2023 (in ITA Nos. 51 to 66/GAU/2023) (vii) That the price escalation in shares was due to the order of the Hon’ble Calcutta High Court for amalgamation, which was passed

Showing 1–20 of 64 · Page 1 of 4

17
Depreciation14
Section 80l10

D.C.I.T., CIRCLE- 1, DIBRUGARH vs. VISHAL BAMALWA , DIBRUGARH

In the result, all the appeals of the Revenue are dismissed and that of the Cross Objections of the assessees are allowed

ITA 60/GTY/2023[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Guwahati01 Sept 2023AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav, Vice-(Kz) & Shri Rajesh Kumar

vi) That he was not aware of any organized racket of any operators involved in the generation of bogus LTCG as alleged by the A.O. CO Nos. 6 to 21/GAU/2023 (in ITA Nos. 51 to 66/GAU/2023) (vii) That the price escalation in shares was due to the order of the Hon’ble Calcutta High Court for amalgamation, which was passed

DCIT, CIRCLE-1, DIBRUGARH vs. BAJRANG LAL BAMALWA, DIBRUGARH

In the result, all the appeals of the Revenue are dismissed and that of the Cross Objections of the assessees are allowed

ITA 52/GTY/2023[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Guwahati01 Sept 2023AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav, Vice-(Kz) & Shri Rajesh Kumar

vi) That he was not aware of any organized racket of any operators involved in the generation of bogus LTCG as alleged by the A.O. CO Nos. 6 to 21/GAU/2023 (in ITA Nos. 51 to 66/GAU/2023) (vii) That the price escalation in shares was due to the order of the Hon’ble Calcutta High Court for amalgamation, which was passed

D.C.I.T., CIRCLE- 1, DIBRUGARH vs. HANS RAJ BAMALWA (HUF), DIBRUGARH

In the result, all the appeals of the Revenue are dismissed and that of the Cross Objections of the assessees are allowed

ITA 56/GTY/2023[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Guwahati01 Sept 2023AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav, Vice-(Kz) & Shri Rajesh Kumar

vi) That he was not aware of any organized racket of any operators involved in the generation of bogus LTCG as alleged by the A.O. CO Nos. 6 to 21/GAU/2023 (in ITA Nos. 51 to 66/GAU/2023) (vii) That the price escalation in shares was due to the order of the Hon’ble Calcutta High Court for amalgamation, which was passed

D.C.I.T., CIRCLE- 1, DIBRUGARH vs. USHA BAMALWA, DIBRUGARH

In the result, all the appeals of the Revenue are dismissed and that of the Cross Objections of the assessees are allowed

ITA 57/GTY/2023[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Guwahati01 Sept 2023AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav, Vice-(Kz) & Shri Rajesh Kumar

vi) That he was not aware of any organized racket of any operators involved in the generation of bogus LTCG as alleged by the A.O. CO Nos. 6 to 21/GAU/2023 (in ITA Nos. 51 to 66/GAU/2023) (vii) That the price escalation in shares was due to the order of the Hon’ble Calcutta High Court for amalgamation, which was passed

D.C.I.T., CIRCLE-1, DIBRUGARH vs. BACHH RAJ BAMALWA, DIBRUGARH

In the result, all the appeals of the Revenue are dismissed and that of the Cross Objections of the assessees are allowed

ITA 54/GTY/2023[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Guwahati01 Sept 2023AY 2015-16

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav, Vice-(Kz) & Shri Rajesh Kumar

vi) That he was not aware of any organized racket of any operators involved in the generation of bogus LTCG as alleged by the A.O. CO Nos. 6 to 21/GAU/2023 (in ITA Nos. 51 to 66/GAU/2023) (vii) That the price escalation in shares was due to the order of the Hon’ble Calcutta High Court for amalgamation, which was passed

DCIT, CIRCLE-1, DIBRUGARH vs. BAJRANG LAL BAMALWA, DIBRUGARH

In the result, all the appeals of the Revenue are dismissed and that of the Cross Objections of the assessees are allowed

ITA 51/GTY/2023[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Guwahati01 Sept 2023AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav, Vice-(Kz) & Shri Rajesh Kumar

vi) That he was not aware of any organized racket of any operators involved in the generation of bogus LTCG as alleged by the A.O. CO Nos. 6 to 21/GAU/2023 (in ITA Nos. 51 to 66/GAU/2023) (vii) That the price escalation in shares was due to the order of the Hon’ble Calcutta High Court for amalgamation, which was passed

D.C.I.T., CIRCLE- 1, DIBRUGARH vs. HANS RAJ BAMALWA, DIBRUGARH

In the result, all the appeals of the Revenue are dismissed and that of the Cross Objections of the assessees are allowed

ITA 55/GTY/2023[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Guwahati01 Sept 2023AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav, Vice-(Kz) & Shri Rajesh Kumar

vi) That he was not aware of any organized racket of any operators involved in the generation of bogus LTCG as alleged by the A.O. CO Nos. 6 to 21/GAU/2023 (in ITA Nos. 51 to 66/GAU/2023) (vii) That the price escalation in shares was due to the order of the Hon’ble Calcutta High Court for amalgamation, which was passed

D.C.I.T., CIRCLE-1, DIBRUGARH vs. VINAY BAMALWA, DIBRUGARH

In the result, all the appeals of the Revenue are dismissed and that of the Cross Objections of the assessees are allowed

ITA 61/GTY/2023[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Guwahati01 Sept 2023AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav, Vice-(Kz) & Shri Rajesh Kumar

vi) That he was not aware of any organized racket of any operators involved in the generation of bogus LTCG as alleged by the A.O. CO Nos. 6 to 21/GAU/2023 (in ITA Nos. 51 to 66/GAU/2023) (vii) That the price escalation in shares was due to the order of the Hon’ble Calcutta High Court for amalgamation, which was passed

D.C.I.T., CIRCLE-1, DIBRUGARH vs. RAVI BAMALWA, DIBRUGARH

In the result, all the appeals of the Revenue are dismissed and that of the Cross Objections of the assessees are allowed

ITA 62/GTY/2023[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Guwahati01 Sept 2023AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav, Vice-(Kz) & Shri Rajesh Kumar

vi) That he was not aware of any organized racket of any operators involved in the generation of bogus LTCG as alleged by the A.O. CO Nos. 6 to 21/GAU/2023 (in ITA Nos. 51 to 66/GAU/2023) (vii) That the price escalation in shares was due to the order of the Hon’ble Calcutta High Court for amalgamation, which was passed

D.C.I.T., CIRCLE-1, DIBRUGARH vs. MADAN LAL BAMALWA, DIBRUGARH

In the result, all the appeals of the Revenue are dismissed and that of the Cross Objections of the assessees are allowed

ITA 63/GTY/2023[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Guwahati01 Sept 2023AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav, Vice-(Kz) & Shri Rajesh Kumar

vi) That he was not aware of any organized racket of any operators involved in the generation of bogus LTCG as alleged by the A.O. CO Nos. 6 to 21/GAU/2023 (in ITA Nos. 51 to 66/GAU/2023) (vii) That the price escalation in shares was due to the order of the Hon’ble Calcutta High Court for amalgamation, which was passed

D.C.I.T., CIRCLE-1, DIBRUGARH vs. SHEETAL BAMALWA, DIBRUGARH

In the result, all the appeals of the Revenue are dismissed and that of the Cross Objections of the assessees are allowed

ITA 64/GTY/2023[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Guwahati01 Sept 2023AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav, Vice-(Kz) & Shri Rajesh Kumar

vi) That he was not aware of any organized racket of any operators involved in the generation of bogus LTCG as alleged by the A.O. CO Nos. 6 to 21/GAU/2023 (in ITA Nos. 51 to 66/GAU/2023) (vii) That the price escalation in shares was due to the order of the Hon’ble Calcutta High Court for amalgamation, which was passed

D.C.I.T., CIRCLE-1, DIBRUGARH vs. PRAMOD KUMAR BAMALWA, DIBRUGARH

In the result, all the appeals of the Revenue are dismissed and that of the Cross Objections of the assessees are allowed

ITA 65/GTY/2023[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Guwahati01 Sept 2023AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav, Vice-(Kz) & Shri Rajesh Kumar

vi) That he was not aware of any organized racket of any operators involved in the generation of bogus LTCG as alleged by the A.O. CO Nos. 6 to 21/GAU/2023 (in ITA Nos. 51 to 66/GAU/2023) (vii) That the price escalation in shares was due to the order of the Hon’ble Calcutta High Court for amalgamation, which was passed

D.C.I.T., CIRCLE-1, DIBRUGARH vs. VINOD BAMALWA, DIBRUGARH

In the result, all the appeals of the Revenue are dismissed and that of the Cross Objections of the assessees are allowed

ITA 66/GTY/2023[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Guwahati01 Sept 2023AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav, Vice-(Kz) & Shri Rajesh Kumar

vi) That he was not aware of any organized racket of any operators involved in the generation of bogus LTCG as alleged by the A.O. CO Nos. 6 to 21/GAU/2023 (in ITA Nos. 51 to 66/GAU/2023) (vii) That the price escalation in shares was due to the order of the Hon’ble Calcutta High Court for amalgamation, which was passed

D.C.I.T., CIRCLE- 1, DIBRUGARH vs. MEENAKSHI BAMALWA SONI, DIBRUGARH

In the result, all the appeals of the Revenue are dismissed and that of the Cross Objections of the assessees are allowed

ITA 58/GTY/2023[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Guwahati01 Sept 2023AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav, Vice-(Kz) & Shri Rajesh Kumar

vi) That he was not aware of any organized racket of any operators involved in the generation of bogus LTCG as alleged by the A.O. CO Nos. 6 to 21/GAU/2023 (in ITA Nos. 51 to 66/GAU/2023) (vii) That the price escalation in shares was due to the order of the Hon’ble Calcutta High Court for amalgamation, which was passed

GREENWOOD RESORTS PRIVATE LIMITED,GUWAHATI vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, GUWAHATI

In the result, ITA No. 114/GTY/2024 for AY 2017-18 is partly allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 110/GTY/2024[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Guwahati29 May 2025AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri Manomohan Das & Shri Rakesh Mishra

Section 153CSection 250Section 36Section 40A(3)Section 68

vi. ITA No. 115/GTY/2024: A.Y. 2018-19: 1 For that assessment order passed u/s 153C/143(3) is bad in law and liable to be quashed as no proper satisfaction has been recorded as required under the provision of I T Act. 2 For that additions made by the A.O. and upheld

GREENWOOD RESORTS PRIVATE LIMITED,GUWAHATI vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, GUWAHATI

In the result, ITA No. 114/GTY/2024 for AY 2017-18 is partly allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 116/GTY/2024[2019-20]Status: DisposedITAT Guwahati29 May 2025AY 2019-20

Bench: Shri Manomohan Das & Shri Rakesh Mishra

Section 153CSection 250Section 36Section 40A(3)Section 68

vi. ITA No. 115/GTY/2024: A.Y. 2018-19: 1 For that assessment order passed u/s 153C/143(3) is bad in law and liable to be quashed as no proper satisfaction has been recorded as required under the provision of I T Act. 2 For that additions made by the A.O. and upheld

GREENWOOD RESORTS PRIVATE LIMITED,GUWAHATI vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, GUWAHATI

In the result, ITA No. 114/GTY/2024 for AY 2017-18 is partly allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 111/GTY/2024[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Guwahati29 May 2025AY 2016-17

Bench: Shri Manomohan Das & Shri Rakesh Mishra

Section 153CSection 250Section 36Section 40A(3)Section 68

vi. ITA No. 115/GTY/2024: A.Y. 2018-19: 1 For that assessment order passed u/s 153C/143(3) is bad in law and liable to be quashed as no proper satisfaction has been recorded as required under the provision of I T Act. 2 For that additions made by the A.O. and upheld

GREENWOOD RESORTS PRIVATE LIMITED,GUWAHATI vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, GUWAHATI

In the result, ITA No. 114/GTY/2024 for AY 2017-18 is partly allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 113/GTY/2024[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Guwahati29 May 2025AY 2017-18

Bench: Shri Manomohan Das & Shri Rakesh Mishra

Section 153CSection 250Section 36Section 40A(3)Section 68

vi. ITA No. 115/GTY/2024: A.Y. 2018-19: 1 For that assessment order passed u/s 153C/143(3) is bad in law and liable to be quashed as no proper satisfaction has been recorded as required under the provision of I T Act. 2 For that additions made by the A.O. and upheld