BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

13 results for “section 68”+ Section 164clear

Sorted by relevance

Delhi651Karnataka468Mumbai458Surat158Bangalore138Jaipur127Kolkata101Ahmedabad78Chennai72Chandigarh64Hyderabad56Pune52Indore43Visakhapatnam36Ranchi36Telangana35Raipur33Lucknow31Cuttack25Nagpur25Calcutta17Cochin14Guwahati13Agra10Allahabad9Jodhpur7Patna7SC7Amritsar6Panaji5Rajkot5Rajasthan5Orissa3Andhra Pradesh1Varanasi1

Key Topics

Section 143(3)26Section 14713Addition to Income13Section 6812Section 80l10Deduction10Reopening of Assessment10Section 153A4Section 143(2)3

M/S. SMS SMELTERS LIMITED,NAHARLAGUN vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE - 3, GUWAHATI

Appeals are allowed in view of our foregoing detailed discussions

ITA 96/GTY/2017[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Guwahati06 Sept 2019AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri S.S.Godara & Dr. A.L. Saini

Section 143(3)Section 147Section 68Section 80l

68 of the Act. He has taken pains to invite our attention to the fact that the assessee’s investors / subscribers, Mr. C.N.Lyngdoh is an exempt assessee u/s 10(26) of the Act not filing any return of income and all this sufficiently indicates that the share application / premium amount in question lacks genuineness / creditworthiness. He further states that

JUD CEMENT LIMITED,SHILLONG vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME, CIRCLE - SHILLONG , SHILLONG

Appeals are allowed in view of our foregoing detailed discussions

Section 142(1)2
Section 151A2
Undisclosed Income2
ITA 40/GTY/2017[2008-09]Status: DisposedITAT Guwahati06 Sept 2019AY 2008-09

Bench: Shri S.S.Godara & Dr. A.L. Saini

Section 143(3)Section 147Section 68Section 80l

68 of the Act. He has taken pains to invite our attention to the fact that the assessee’s investors / subscribers, Mr. C.N.Lyngdoh is an exempt assessee u/s 10(26) of the Act not filing any return of income and all this sufficiently indicates that the share application / premium amount in question lacks genuineness / creditworthiness. He further states that

DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE - 3, GUWAHATI vs. M/S. SMS SMELTERS LIMITED, NAHARLAGUN

Appeals are allowed in view of our foregoing detailed discussions

ITA 69/GTY/2017[2007-08]Status: DisposedITAT Guwahati06 Sept 2019AY 2007-08

Bench: Shri S.S.Godara & Dr. A.L. Saini

Section 143(3)Section 147Section 68Section 80l

68 of the Act. He has taken pains to invite our attention to the fact that the assessee’s investors / subscribers, Mr. C.N.Lyngdoh is an exempt assessee u/s 10(26) of the Act not filing any return of income and all this sufficiently indicates that the share application / premium amount in question lacks genuineness / creditworthiness. He further states that

DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE - 3, GUWAHATI vs. M/S. SMS SMELTERS LIMITED, NAHARLAGUN

Appeals are allowed in view of our foregoing detailed discussions

ITA 91/GTY/2017[2006-07]Status: DisposedITAT Guwahati06 Sept 2019AY 2006-07

Bench: Shri S.S.Godara & Dr. A.L. Saini

Section 143(3)Section 147Section 68Section 80l

68 of the Act. He has taken pains to invite our attention to the fact that the assessee’s investors / subscribers, Mr. C.N.Lyngdoh is an exempt assessee u/s 10(26) of the Act not filing any return of income and all this sufficiently indicates that the share application / premium amount in question lacks genuineness / creditworthiness. He further states that

M/S. SMS SMELTERS LIMITED,NAHARLAGUN vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE - 3, GUWAHATI

Appeals are allowed in view of our foregoing detailed discussions

ITA 93/GTY/2017[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Guwahati06 Sept 2019AY 2009-10

Bench: Shri S.S.Godara & Dr. A.L. Saini

Section 143(3)Section 147Section 68Section 80l

68 of the Act. He has taken pains to invite our attention to the fact that the assessee’s investors / subscribers, Mr. C.N.Lyngdoh is an exempt assessee u/s 10(26) of the Act not filing any return of income and all this sufficiently indicates that the share application / premium amount in question lacks genuineness / creditworthiness. He further states that

M/S. SMS SMELTERS LIMITED,NAHARLAGUN vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE - 3, GUWAHATI

Appeals are allowed in view of our foregoing detailed discussions

ITA 94/GTY/2017[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Guwahati06 Sept 2019AY 2010-11

Bench: Shri S.S.Godara & Dr. A.L. Saini

Section 143(3)Section 147Section 68Section 80l

68 of the Act. He has taken pains to invite our attention to the fact that the assessee’s investors / subscribers, Mr. C.N.Lyngdoh is an exempt assessee u/s 10(26) of the Act not filing any return of income and all this sufficiently indicates that the share application / premium amount in question lacks genuineness / creditworthiness. He further states that

M/S. SMS SMELTERS LIMITED,NAHARLAGUN vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE - 3, GUWAHATI

Appeals are allowed in view of our foregoing detailed discussions

ITA 95/GTY/2017[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Guwahati06 Sept 2019AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri S.S.Godara & Dr. A.L. Saini

Section 143(3)Section 147Section 68Section 80l

68 of the Act. He has taken pains to invite our attention to the fact that the assessee’s investors / subscribers, Mr. C.N.Lyngdoh is an exempt assessee u/s 10(26) of the Act not filing any return of income and all this sufficiently indicates that the share application / premium amount in question lacks genuineness / creditworthiness. He further states that

JUD CEMENT LIMITED,SHILLONG vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME, CIRCLE - SHILLONG , SHILLONG

Appeals are allowed in view of our foregoing detailed discussions

ITA 39/GTY/2017[2006-07]Status: DisposedITAT Guwahati06 Sept 2019AY 2006-07

Bench: Shri S.S.Godara & Dr. A.L. Saini

Section 143(3)Section 147Section 68Section 80l

68 of the Act. He has taken pains to invite our attention to the fact that the assessee’s investors / subscribers, Mr. C.N.Lyngdoh is an exempt assessee u/s 10(26) of the Act not filing any return of income and all this sufficiently indicates that the share application / premium amount in question lacks genuineness / creditworthiness. He further states that

DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE - 3, GUWAHATI vs. M/S. SMS SMELTERS LIMITED, NAHARLAGUN

Appeals are allowed in view of our foregoing detailed discussions

ITA 76/GTY/2017[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Guwahati06 Sept 2019AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri S.S.Godara & Dr. A.L. Saini

Section 143(3)Section 147Section 68Section 80l

68 of the Act. He has taken pains to invite our attention to the fact that the assessee’s investors / subscribers, Mr. C.N.Lyngdoh is an exempt assessee u/s 10(26) of the Act not filing any return of income and all this sufficiently indicates that the share application / premium amount in question lacks genuineness / creditworthiness. He further states that

DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE - 3, GUWAHATI vs. M/S. SMS SMELTERS LIMITED, NAHARLAGUN

Appeals are allowed in view of our foregoing detailed discussions

ITA 77/GTY/2017[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Guwahati06 Sept 2019AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri S.S.Godara & Dr. A.L. Saini

Section 143(3)Section 147Section 68Section 80l

68 of the Act. He has taken pains to invite our attention to the fact that the assessee’s investors / subscribers, Mr. C.N.Lyngdoh is an exempt assessee u/s 10(26) of the Act not filing any return of income and all this sufficiently indicates that the share application / premium amount in question lacks genuineness / creditworthiness. He further states that

DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE- 3, GUWAHATI vs. M/S. SATYAM ISPAT (NORTH EAST) LIMITED, BANDERDEWA

Appeals are dismissed

ITA 84/GTY/2017[2007-08]Status: DisposedITAT Guwahati02 Aug 2019AY 2007-08

Bench: Shri S.S.Godara & Dr. A.L. Saini

Section 143(3)Section 153A

164 TTJ 448 (Delhi "F" Bench) (iv) Jai Steel (India) V/s. A.C.I.T. (2013) 259 CTR 281 (Rajasthan) ITA No.83-84/Gau/2017 A.Ys. 2006-07 &2007-08 DCIT, Cir-3 Guwa Vs. M/s Satyam Ispat (NE) Ltd. Page 3 (v) A.C.I.T. V/s. Pratibha Industries Ltd. (2013) 141 I.T.D. 151 (Mumbai) (vi) A.C.I.T. V/s. Kamal Kumar S. Agarwal (2010) 133 TTJ 818 (Nagpur

DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE- 3, GUWAHATI vs. M/S. SATYAM ISPAT (NORTH EAST) LIMITED, BANDERDEWA

Appeals are dismissed

ITA 83/GTY/2017[2006-07]Status: DisposedITAT Guwahati02 Aug 2019AY 2006-07

Bench: Shri S.S.Godara & Dr. A.L. Saini

Section 143(3)Section 153A

164 TTJ 448 (Delhi "F" Bench) (iv) Jai Steel (India) V/s. A.C.I.T. (2013) 259 CTR 281 (Rajasthan) ITA No.83-84/Gau/2017 A.Ys. 2006-07 &2007-08 DCIT, Cir-3 Guwa Vs. M/s Satyam Ispat (NE) Ltd. Page 3 (v) A.C.I.T. V/s. Pratibha Industries Ltd. (2013) 141 I.T.D. 151 (Mumbai) (vi) A.C.I.T. V/s. Kamal Kumar S. Agarwal (2010) 133 TTJ 818 (Nagpur

ASSAM VALLEY FINANCE AND INVESTMENT PVT LTD,GUWAHATI vs. D.C.I.T., CIRCLE 1, GUWAHATI

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 75/GTY/2025[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Guwahati18 Dec 2025AY 2016-17

Bench: Shri Rajesh Kumar, Am & Shri Manomohan Das, Jm Assam Valley Finance & Dcit, Circle 1 Investment Pvt. Ltd. Aayakar Bhawan, Christian Basti, House No.1, Niligiri Path, G.S Road, Guwahati-781005, Vs. Zoo Road, Guwahati-781024 Assam (Appellant) (Respondent) Pan No. Aabca6974B Assessee By : Shri Miraj D Shah, Ar Revenue By : Shri Santosh Kumar Karnani, Dr Date Of Hearing: 12.11.2025 Date Of Pronouncement: 18.12.2025 O R D E R Per Rajesh Kumar, Am:

For Appellant: Shri Miraj D Shah, ARFor Respondent: Shri Santosh Kumar Karnani
Section 142(1)Section 143(2)Section 144BSection 147Section 148Section 151Section 151ASection 68

164/- as unexplained cash credit u/s 68 of the Act in respect of loss shown by the assessee in the profit and loss account. 2.2. In the appellate proceedings, the ld. CIT (A) dismissed the appeal of the assessee. 2.3. After hearing the rival contentions and perusing the materials available on record, we find that in this case the assessment