THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-2, DIBRUGARH vs. OIL INDIA LTD., DIBRUGARH

Bench: Shri S.S.Godara & Dr. A.L. Saini

120 190 ITR 553 (All) at pages 555 (C) Regarding the assertions of the AO that the undertaking has been formed by transfer of assets, the AR submitted that the assessee has not transferred any plant or machinery which was formerly used by the assessee. In fact, in each Oil Well, only new plant or machinery has been used

OIL INDIA LTD.,,DIBRUGARH vs. THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-2,, DIBRUGARH.

Bench: Shri S.S.Godara & Dr. A.L. Saini

120 190 ITR 553 (All) at pages 555 (C) Regarding the assertions of the AO that the undertaking has been formed by transfer of assets, the AR submitted that the assessee has not transferred any plant or machinery which was formerly used by the assessee. In fact, in each Oil Well, only new plant or machinery has been used

THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-2, DIBRUGARH vs. OIL INDIA LTD., DIBRUGARH

Bench: Shri S.S.Godara & Dr. A.L. Saini

120 190 ITR 553 (All) at pages 555 (C) Regarding the assertions of the AO that the undertaking has been formed by transfer of assets, the AR submitted that the assessee has not transferred any plant or machinery which was formerly used by the assessee. In fact, in each Oil Well, only new plant or machinery has been used

OIL INDIA LTD.,DIBRUGARH vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE -2, DIBRUGARH

Bench: Shri S.S.Godara & Dr. A.L. Saini

120 190 ITR 553 (All) at pages 555 (C) Regarding the assertions of the AO that the undertaking has been formed by transfer of assets, the AR submitted that the assessee has not transferred any plant or machinery which was formerly used by the assessee. In fact, in each Oil Well, only new plant or machinery has been used

OIL INDIA LTD.,DIBRUGARH vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, RANGE -2, DIBRUGARH

Bench: Shri S.S.Godara & Dr. A.L. Saini

120 190 ITR 553 (All) at pages 555 (C) Regarding the assertions of the AO that the undertaking has been formed by transfer of assets, the AR submitted that the assessee has not transferred any plant or machinery which was formerly used by the assessee. In fact, in each Oil Well, only new plant or machinery has been used

OIL INDIA LTD.,DIBRUGARH vs. ADDITIONAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, RANGE -2, DIBRUGARH

Bench: Shri S.S.Godara & Dr. A.L. Saini

120 190 ITR 553 (All) at pages 555 (C) Regarding the assertions of the AO that the undertaking has been formed by transfer of assets, the AR submitted that the assessee has not transferred any plant or machinery which was formerly used by the assessee. In fact, in each Oil Well, only new plant or machinery has been used

THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-2,, DIBRUGARH. vs. OIL INDIA LTD., DIBRUGARH

Bench: Shri S.S.Godara & Dr. A.L. Saini

120 190 ITR 553 (All) at pages 555 (C) Regarding the assertions of the AO that the undertaking has been formed by transfer of assets, the AR submitted that the assessee has not transferred any plant or machinery which was formerly used by the assessee. In fact, in each Oil Well, only new plant or machinery has been used

THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-2,, DIBRUGARH. vs. OIL INDIA LTD., DIBRUGARH

Bench: Shri S.S.Godara & Dr. A.L. Saini

120 190 ITR 553 (All) at pages 555 (C) Regarding the assertions of the AO that the undertaking has been formed by transfer of assets, the AR submitted that the assessee has not transferred any plant or machinery which was formerly used by the assessee. In fact, in each Oil Well, only new plant or machinery has been used

DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE - AGARTALA , AGARTALA vs. SHRI SUBHAJIT PAUL, AGARTALA

In the result, cross-objection nos

Bench: Shri A. T. Varkey, Jm &Dr. A.L.Saini, Am आयकरअपीलसं./Ita No.116/Gau/2018 ("नधा"रणवष" / Assessment Year:2014-15)

68,760 ….do…. 11 ….do... …do…. 11- 21,25,81,959 ….do…. 12 ….do... …do…. 12- 33,70,10,742 ….do…. 13 ….do... …do…. 13- 27,25,50,393 ….do…. 14 ….do... …do…. 14- 20,70,87,907 ….do…. 15 Subhajit Paul AZNPP5539K

ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-1, GUWAHATI vs. ROHIT JAIN, SHILLONG

In the result, the appeals filed by the Revenue are dismissed

Bench: Sri Rajpal Yadav(Kz) & Dr. Manish Borad

4) of the Act on 29-07-2016. In fact, subsequent to the disclosure statement on 29-07-2016, the respondent had appeared before a Notary Public in Shillong on 25-08-2016, and affirmed on oath that the disclosure statement was obtained on coercion without any aid of the accounts of the respondent and his group members

ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-1, GUWAHATI vs. ROHIT JAIN, SHILLONG

In the result, the appeals filed by the Revenue are dismissed

Bench: Sri Rajpal Yadav(Kz) & Dr. Manish Borad

4) of the Act on 29-07-2016. In fact, subsequent to the disclosure statement on 29-07-2016, the respondent had appeared before a Notary Public in Shillong on 25-08-2016, and affirmed on oath that the disclosure statement was obtained on coercion without any aid of the accounts of the respondent and his group members

LAXMI NARAYAN PACKAGING INDUSTRIES,GUWAHATI vs. THE INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD - 2(1), GUWAHATI, GUWAHATI

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes

Bench: Sri Duvvuru Rl Reddy(Kz) & Sri Rakesh Mishra

120 (Cuttack)(TM) "Annexure - C” (at Pages 62 to 68). (b) Bansal Strips (P.) Ltd. Vs. A.C.I.T. (2006) 99 ITD 177 (Delhi) "Annexure - D" (at Pages 69 to 83). Further reliance was placed upon the decision of Hon'ble Madras High Court in the case of C.I.T. Vs. S. Khader Khan Son (2008) 300 ITR 157 (Madras) which was affirmed

GREENWOOD RESORTS PRIVATE LIMITED,GUWAHATI vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, GUWAHATI

In the result, ITA No. 114/GTY/2024 for AY 2017-18 is partly allowed for statistical purposes

Bench: Shri Manomohan Das & Shri Rakesh Mishra

4,95,17,205/- 5,97,56,401/- 31,84,000/- 70,55,196/- 9. That Sir, in view of 1 Proviso to Sec. 153C the date of Search is to be construed when it is received by AO of such third person. In this case we are the person covered by such law. In our case AO has issued

GREENWOOD RESORTS PRIVATE LIMITED,GUWAHATI vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, GUWAHATI

In the result, ITA No. 114/GTY/2024 for AY 2017-18 is partly allowed for statistical purposes

Bench: Shri Manomohan Das & Shri Rakesh Mishra

4,95,17,205/- 5,97,56,401/- 31,84,000/- 70,55,196/- 9. That Sir, in view of 1 Proviso to Sec. 153C the date of Search is to be construed when it is received by AO of such third person. In this case we are the person covered by such law. In our case AO has issued

GREENWOOD RESORTS PRIVATE LIMITED,GUWAHATI vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, GUWAHATI

In the result, ITA No. 114/GTY/2024 for AY 2017-18 is partly allowed for statistical purposes

Bench: Shri Manomohan Das & Shri Rakesh Mishra

4,95,17,205/- 5,97,56,401/- 31,84,000/- 70,55,196/- 9. That Sir, in view of 1 Proviso to Sec. 153C the date of Search is to be construed when it is received by AO of such third person. In this case we are the person covered by such law. In our case AO has issued

GREENWOOD RESORTS PRIVATE LIMITED,GUWAHATI vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, GUWAHATI

In the result, ITA No. 114/GTY/2024 for AY 2017-18 is partly allowed for statistical purposes

Bench: Shri Manomohan Das & Shri Rakesh Mishra

4,95,17,205/- 5,97,56,401/- 31,84,000/- 70,55,196/- 9. That Sir, in view of 1 Proviso to Sec. 153C the date of Search is to be construed when it is received by AO of such third person. In this case we are the person covered by such law. In our case AO has issued

GREENWOOD RESORTS PRIVATE LIMITED,GUWAHATI vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, GUWAHATI

In the result, ITA No. 114/GTY/2024 for AY 2017-18 is partly allowed for statistical purposes

Bench: Shri Manomohan Das & Shri Rakesh Mishra

4,95,17,205/- 5,97,56,401/- 31,84,000/- 70,55,196/- 9. That Sir, in view of 1 Proviso to Sec. 153C the date of Search is to be construed when it is received by AO of such third person. In this case we are the person covered by such law. In our case AO has issued

GREENWOOD RESORTS PRIVATE LIMITED,GUWAHATI vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, GUWAHATI

In the result, ITA No. 114/GTY/2024 for AY 2017-18 is partly allowed for statistical purposes

Bench: Shri Manomohan Das & Shri Rakesh Mishra

4,95,17,205/- 5,97,56,401/- 31,84,000/- 70,55,196/- 9. That Sir, in view of 1 Proviso to Sec. 153C the date of Search is to be construed when it is received by AO of such third person. In this case we are the person covered by such law. In our case AO has issued

GREENWOOD RESORTS PRIVATE LIMITED,GUWAHATI vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, GUWAHATI

In the result, ITA No. 114/GTY/2024 for AY 2017-18 is partly allowed for statistical purposes

Bench: Shri Manomohan Das & Shri Rakesh Mishra

4,95,17,205/- 5,97,56,401/- 31,84,000/- 70,55,196/- 9. That Sir, in view of 1 Proviso to Sec. 153C the date of Search is to be construed when it is received by AO of such third person. In this case we are the person covered by such law. In our case AO has issued