ASSAM VALLEY FINANCE AND INVESTMENT PVT LTD,GUWAHATI vs. D.C.I.T., CIRCLE 1, GUWAHATI

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed

Bench: Shri Rajesh Kumar, Am & Shri Manomohan Das, Jm Assam Valley Finance & Dcit, Circle 1 Investment Pvt. Ltd. Aayakar Bhawan, Christian Basti, House No.1, Niligiri Path, G.S Road, Guwahati-781005, Vs. Zoo Road, Guwahati-781024 Assam (Appellant) (Respondent) Pan No. Aabca6974B Assessee By : Shri Miraj D Shah, Ar Revenue By : Shri Santosh Kumar Karnani, Dr Date Of Hearing: 12.11.2025 Date Of Pronouncement: 18.12.2025 O R D E R Per Rajesh Kumar, Am:

unexplained cash credit u/s 68 of the Act. The addition on this count also cannot be sustained. We therefore, inclined to quash the assessment framed by NFAC, Delhi on the ground of lack of jurisdiction. The ground nos.12 and 13 are allowed. 2.6. So far as the re-opening of assessment is concerned, we observe that the same is made

AMPLEX PROJECTS PRIVATE LIMITED,AGARTALA vs. DCIT/ACIT, CIRCLE SILCHAR, SILCHAR

In the result, appeal of the assessee is allowed in above terms

Bench: the Ld. CIT(A).

unexplained cash credit u/s 68 of the Act. Subsequently, proceeding w/s.153A of the Act was initiated against the assessee and notices 153A of the Act were issued and served on the assessee for the AYs 2010-11 to 2015-16. Copies enclosed at pg 1-6 of the Additional P/b. At the juncture, would be of relevance to quote secund

MANOJ ANAND,GUWAHATI vs. ITO W-2(2) GHY, GUWAHATI

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed

Bench: Shri Rajesh Kumar, Am & Shri Manomohan Das, Jm Manoj Anand Ito W-2(2), Ghy Flat 4D, Garima Grand, Aaykar Bhawan, Christian Basti, Departmental Representative B. G.S. Road, Guwahati-781005, Vs. Baruah Road, Guwahati-781007, Assam Assam (Appellant) (Respondent) Pan No. Agbpa9883C

unexplained cash credit/ bogus credit and added to the income of the assessee u/s 68 of the Act in the assessment framed u/s 147 read with section 144B of the Act dated 25.03.2023. 3.2. In the appellate proceedings, the ld. CIT (A) also confirmed the order of the ld. AO by dismissing the appeal of the assessee by observing

ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-1, GUWAHATI vs. M/S. PAWAN CEMENT COMPANY PRIVATE LIMITED, GUWAHATI

In the result, both the appeals filed by the Revenue for AY

Bench: Sri Rajpal Yadav(Kz) & Dr. Manish Borad

unexplained cash credit u/s 68 of the Act. 5. When the matter travelled before ld. CIT(A) he on observing that the addition made by ld. AO is only on the basis of the statement given during the course of search on 31.08.2016 which stands retracted by the assessee by filing an affidavit on 05.09.2016 and there being no incriminating

ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-1, GUWAHATI vs. M/S. PAWAN CEMENT COMPANY PRIVATE LIMITED, GUWAHATI

In the result, both the appeals filed by the Revenue for AY

Bench: Sri Rajpal Yadav(Kz) & Dr. Manish Borad

unexplained cash credit u/s 68 of the Act. 5. When the matter travelled before ld. CIT(A) he on observing that the addition made by ld. AO is only on the basis of the statement given during the course of search on 31.08.2016 which stands retracted by the assessee by filing an affidavit on 05.09.2016 and there being no incriminating

ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-1, DIBRUGARH, DIBRUGARH vs. SANTOSH BAMALWA, DIBRUGARH

In the result, appeal of the revenue is dismissed and the cross- objection filed by the assessee is allowed

Bench: Dr. Manish Borad, Hon’Ble & Shri Sonjoy Sarma, Hon’Blei.T.A. No. 104/Gty/2023 Assessment Year: 2012-13 Assistant Commissioner Of Income Smt. Santosh Bamalwa Tax, Circle-1, Dibrugarh Vs Ground Floor Mahalaya Road C/O A.K. Varma Dibrugarh - 786001 [Pan: Aedpb9900P] अपीलाथ"/ (Appellant) "" यथ"/ (Respondent) C.O. No. 34/Gty/2023 Assessment Year: 2012-13 Smt. Santosh Bamalwa Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax, Circle-1, Dibrugarh Vs Ground Floor Mahalaya Road C/O A.K. Varma Dibrugarh - 786001 [Pan: Aedpb9900P] अपीलाथ"/ (Appellant) "" यथ"/ (Respondent) Assessee By : Shri S.K. Tulsiyan, Advocate Revenue By : Shri Arun Bhowmick, Jcit, D/R सुनवाई क" तारीख/Date Of Hearing : 01/11/2023 घोषणा क" तारीख /Date Of Pronouncement: 13/12/2023 आदेश/O R D E R Per Dr. Manish Borad: The Present Appeal Filed By The Revenue & The Cross-Objection Filed By The Assessee Are Directed Against The Order Of The Learned Commissioner Of Income Tax (Appeals), Central, North-East Region, Guwahati (Hereinafter The “Ld. Cit(A)”) Dt. 14/07/2023, Passed U/S

unexplained cash credit. In appeal before the ld. CIT(A), assessee got relief on the ground that no incriminating material were found during the course of search pertaining to the alleged transaction giving rise to alleged long term capital gain and since the year under consideration is Assessment Year 2012-13 and the time limit to select the case

MAYURPLY INDUSTRIES PVT LTD.,HOOGHLY, WEST BENGAL vs. ACIT, CIRCLE 3, GUWAHATI, ASSAM

In the result IT(SS)A Nos

Bench: Shri Rajesh Kumar, Am & Shri Manomohan Das, Jm

cash credit in the hands of the assessee u/s 68 of the Act and added to the total income of the assessee in the assessment framed u/s 153A of the Act read with Section 144(3) dated 30.12.2019. 05. In the appellate proceedings, the ld. CIT (A), after discussing the assessment order, came to the conclusion that the addition

NORTH EAST HIRE PURCHASE COMPANY (INDIA) PVT.LTD.,GUWAHATI vs. ITO WARD 1(2), GUWAHATI

Appeal of the assessee is allowed

Bench: SHRI RAJESH KUMAR, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER SHRI MANOMOHAN DAS (Judicial Member)

unexplained cash credit u/s 68 of the Act. In the appellate proceedings, the addition was confirmed by the CIT(A). 4. After hearing the rival contentions and perusing the material available on record, we find that in this case the notice u/s 148A(b) of the Act was issued on 17.03.2022 mentioning therein that as per information available with

AMIT KUMAR,DELHI vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD 1(1), GUWAHATI, INCOME TAX OFFICER

Bench: SHRI MANOMOHAN DAS, JUDICIAL MEMBER SHRI SANJAY AWASTHI (Accountant Member)

147 of the Income-tax Act, 1961 Cash credit (Share capital) - Assessment year 2010-11 - Assessee-company was engaged in business of dying of cloth on job-work basis - It filed return declaring certain taxable income Assessing Officer passed an order of assessment under section 143(3) - Subsequently, Investigation Wing of Department supplied a list of paper companies which

AMIT KUMAR,DELHI vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD 1(1), GUWAHATI, INCOME TAS OFFICER

Bench: SHRI MANOMOHAN DAS, JUDICIAL MEMBER SHRI SANJAY AWASTHI (Accountant Member)

147 of the Income-tax Act, 1961 Cash credit (Share capital) - Assessment year 2010-11 - Assessee-company was engaged in business of dying of cloth on job-work basis - It filed return declaring certain taxable income Assessing Officer passed an order of assessment under section 143(3) - Subsequently, Investigation Wing of Department supplied a list of paper companies which

D.C.I.T., CIRCLE- 1, DIBRUGARH vs. MEENAKSHI BAMALWA SONI, DIBRUGARH

In the result, all the appeals of the Revenue are dismissed and that of the Cross Objections of the assessees are allowed

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav, Vice-(Kz) & Shri Rajesh Kumar

unexplained cash credits received. 3. Whether a fact emanating from the statement recorded during search operation could be sufficient to initiate and complete the proceedings u/s 153A/153D of the Income Tax Act. 4. The appellant craves the leave to add/modify/alter any or all the grounds during the course of hearing/pendency of appeal.” 4. As far as the Cross Objections raised

D.C.I.T., CIRCLE-1, DIBRUGARH vs. VINAY BAMALWA, DIBRUGARH

In the result, all the appeals of the Revenue are dismissed and that of the Cross Objections of the assessees are allowed

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav, Vice-(Kz) & Shri Rajesh Kumar

unexplained cash credits received. 3. Whether a fact emanating from the statement recorded during search operation could be sufficient to initiate and complete the proceedings u/s 153A/153D of the Income Tax Act. 4. The appellant craves the leave to add/modify/alter any or all the grounds during the course of hearing/pendency of appeal.” 4. As far as the Cross Objections raised

D.C.I.T., CIRCLE-1, DIBRUGARH vs. RAVI BAMALWA, DIBRUGARH

In the result, all the appeals of the Revenue are dismissed and that of the Cross Objections of the assessees are allowed

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav, Vice-(Kz) & Shri Rajesh Kumar

unexplained cash credits received. 3. Whether a fact emanating from the statement recorded during search operation could be sufficient to initiate and complete the proceedings u/s 153A/153D of the Income Tax Act. 4. The appellant craves the leave to add/modify/alter any or all the grounds during the course of hearing/pendency of appeal.” 4. As far as the Cross Objections raised

D.C.I.T., CIRCLE-1, DIBRUGARH vs. MADAN LAL BAMALWA, DIBRUGARH

In the result, all the appeals of the Revenue are dismissed and that of the Cross Objections of the assessees are allowed

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav, Vice-(Kz) & Shri Rajesh Kumar

unexplained cash credits received. 3. Whether a fact emanating from the statement recorded during search operation could be sufficient to initiate and complete the proceedings u/s 153A/153D of the Income Tax Act. 4. The appellant craves the leave to add/modify/alter any or all the grounds during the course of hearing/pendency of appeal.” 4. As far as the Cross Objections raised

D.C.I.T., CIRCLE-1, DIBRUGARH vs. SHEETAL BAMALWA, DIBRUGARH

In the result, all the appeals of the Revenue are dismissed and that of the Cross Objections of the assessees are allowed

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav, Vice-(Kz) & Shri Rajesh Kumar

unexplained cash credits received. 3. Whether a fact emanating from the statement recorded during search operation could be sufficient to initiate and complete the proceedings u/s 153A/153D of the Income Tax Act. 4. The appellant craves the leave to add/modify/alter any or all the grounds during the course of hearing/pendency of appeal.” 4. As far as the Cross Objections raised

D.C.I.T., CIRCLE-1, DIBRUGARH vs. PRAMOD KUMAR BAMALWA, DIBRUGARH

In the result, all the appeals of the Revenue are dismissed and that of the Cross Objections of the assessees are allowed

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav, Vice-(Kz) & Shri Rajesh Kumar

unexplained cash credits received. 3. Whether a fact emanating from the statement recorded during search operation could be sufficient to initiate and complete the proceedings u/s 153A/153D of the Income Tax Act. 4. The appellant craves the leave to add/modify/alter any or all the grounds during the course of hearing/pendency of appeal.” 4. As far as the Cross Objections raised

D.C.I.T., CIRCLE-1, DIBRUGARH vs. VINOD BAMALWA, DIBRUGARH

In the result, all the appeals of the Revenue are dismissed and that of the Cross Objections of the assessees are allowed

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav, Vice-(Kz) & Shri Rajesh Kumar

unexplained cash credits received. 3. Whether a fact emanating from the statement recorded during search operation could be sufficient to initiate and complete the proceedings u/s 153A/153D of the Income Tax Act. 4. The appellant craves the leave to add/modify/alter any or all the grounds during the course of hearing/pendency of appeal.” 4. As far as the Cross Objections raised

D.C.I.T., CIRCLE-1, DIBRUGARH vs. BACHH RAJ BAMALWA, DIBRUGARH

In the result, all the appeals of the Revenue are dismissed and that of the Cross Objections of the assessees are allowed

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav, Vice-(Kz) & Shri Rajesh Kumar

unexplained cash credits received. 3. Whether a fact emanating from the statement recorded during search operation could be sufficient to initiate and complete the proceedings u/s 153A/153D of the Income Tax Act. 4. The appellant craves the leave to add/modify/alter any or all the grounds during the course of hearing/pendency of appeal.” 4. As far as the Cross Objections raised