BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

35 results for “reassessment u/s 147”+ Survey u/s 133Aclear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai521Delhi482Bangalore192Chennai156Hyderabad111Jaipur110Kolkata93Rajkot68Ahmedabad60Chandigarh45Patna39Surat39Pune39Guwahati35Visakhapatnam31Indore17Lucknow17Raipur15Nagpur15Amritsar14Jodhpur14Panaji6Agra5Cuttack4Allahabad3Ranchi2Kerala2Karnataka2Telangana2Dehradun1Uttarakhand1SC1

Key Topics

Section 14832Section 153A32Section 153D25Section 14721Addition to Income19Section 142(1)13Reopening of Assessment13Section 143(3)12Section 250

DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE -1, GUWAHATI vs. BMG INFORMATICS PVT. LTD., GUWAHATI

In the result, both, the appeal of the revenue as well as cross objection of the assessee are dismissed

ITA 61/GTY/2022[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Guwahati07 Aug 2023AY 2016-17

Bench: Shri Sanjay Garg & Shri Girish Agrawalassessment Year: 2016-17

For Respondent: Shri Amit Kumar Pandey, JCIT
Section 131Section 133ASection 143(3)Section 147Section 148Section 69A

133A of the Act was conducted in the case of D S System Pvt. Ltd. (DSSPL) on 02.11.2017. In this survey, a bunch of loose sheets were impounded inventorised as “DSS-05”. Subsequent to this survey, another survey action was undertaken on the assessee on 28.11.2017. In the course of survey at the premise of the assessee, no incriminating material

Showing 1–20 of 35 · Page 1 of 2

11
Section 133A11
Survey u/s 133A10
Exemption6

ACIT CENTRAL CIRCLE 1 GUWAHATI, GUWAHATI vs. DS SYSTEMS PRIVATE LIMITED, GUWAHATI

In the result, appeal of the revenue is dismissed

ITA 284/GTY/2025[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Guwahati11 Feb 2026AY 2016-17

Bench: the Hon'ble

For Appellant: Sandeep Goel, Advocate
Section 133ASection 143(1)(a)Section 143(2)Section 147Section 148Section 151Section 250Section 69C

147 of the Act, the objections raised by the assessee were disposed of through speaking order which was served to the assessee. Thereafter, detailed questionnaire was issued to the assessee. During the course of reassessment proceedings, the assessee furnished reply time to time. 3. A survey u/s 133A

M/S. SEEMA HOLDING PVT. LTD.,KOLKATA vs. A.C.I.T., CIRCLE -1, GUWAHATI

In the result, appeal of the assessee in ITA No

ITA 68/GTY/2023[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Guwahati01 Sept 2023AY 2015-16

Bench: Shri Rajesh Kumar, Hon’Ble & Shri Sonjoy Sarma, Hon’Blei.T.A. No. 67/Gty/2023 Assessment Year: 2014-15 M/S. Seema Holding Pvt. Ltd. I.T.O. Ward-15(2), Kolkata Vs [Now, Acit, Central Circle-1, 89, Muktaram Babu Street Guwahati] Kolkata - 700007 [Pan : Aadcs5209H] अपीलाथ"/ (Appellant) "" यथ"/ (Respondent)

For Appellant: Shri Soumitra Choudhary, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri Chandan Dutta, D/R
Section 143(3)Section 147Section 148Section 250

reassessment proceedings after expiry of four years from the end of relevant assessment year on the basis of report of investigation cannot be sustained and has to be set aside. In this case, the assessment was completed u/s 143(3) and thereafter the AO received the information from Investigation Wing that the assessee has received bogus loans

M/S. SEEMA HOLDING PVT. LTD.,KOLKATA vs. A.C.I.T., CIRCLE -1, GUWAHATI

In the result, appeal of the assessee in ITA No

ITA 67/GTY/2023[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Guwahati01 Sept 2023AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri Rajesh Kumar, Hon’Ble & Shri Sonjoy Sarma, Hon’Blei.T.A. No. 67/Gty/2023 Assessment Year: 2014-15 M/S. Seema Holding Pvt. Ltd. I.T.O. Ward-15(2), Kolkata Vs [Now, Acit, Central Circle-1, 89, Muktaram Babu Street Guwahati] Kolkata - 700007 [Pan : Aadcs5209H] अपीलाथ"/ (Appellant) "" यथ"/ (Respondent)

For Appellant: Shri Soumitra Choudhary, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri Chandan Dutta, D/R
Section 143(3)Section 147Section 148Section 250

reassessment proceedings after expiry of four years from the end of relevant assessment year on the basis of report of investigation cannot be sustained and has to be set aside. In this case, the assessment was completed u/s 143(3) and thereafter the AO received the information from Investigation Wing that the assessee has received bogus loans

M/S. SEEMA HOLDING PVT. LTD.,KOLKATA vs. A.C.I.T., CIRCLE -1, GUWAHATI

In the result, appeal of the assessee in ITA No

ITA 69/GTY/2023[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Guwahati01 Sept 2023AY 2015-16

Bench: Shri Rajesh Kumar, Hon’Ble & Shri Sonjoy Sarma, Hon’Blei.T.A. No. 67/Gty/2023 Assessment Year: 2014-15 M/S. Seema Holding Pvt. Ltd. I.T.O. Ward-15(2), Kolkata Vs [Now, Acit, Central Circle-1, 89, Muktaram Babu Street Guwahati] Kolkata - 700007 [Pan : Aadcs5209H] अपीलाथ"/ (Appellant) "" यथ"/ (Respondent)

For Appellant: Shri Soumitra Choudhary, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri Chandan Dutta, D/R
Section 143(3)Section 147Section 148Section 250

reassessment proceedings after expiry of four years from the end of relevant assessment year on the basis of report of investigation cannot be sustained and has to be set aside. In this case, the assessment was completed u/s 143(3) and thereafter the AO received the information from Investigation Wing that the assessee has received bogus loans

RI-BHOI ISPAT & ROLLING MILLS,BYRNIHAT vs. ITO, WARD- BYRNIHAT, BYRNIHAT

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 241/GTY/2024[2018-2019]Status: DisposedITAT Guwahati12 Aug 2025AY 2018-2019

Bench: Shri Manomohan Das & Shri Rakesh Mishra

Section 133ASection 147Section 250Section 69C

survey was conducted u/s 133A of the Act. It is stated that on the given addresses, the said entity was found to be non-existent. Accordingly, the assessing officer concluded that the PRPL was only used as a conduit to inflate the expenditure of the assessee. On account of the bogus purchase, the aforementioned addition was made

STAE HEALTH SOCIETY ASSAM,GUWAHATI vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER (EXEMPTION), WARD-2(3), GUWAHATI

In the result, the appeals of the assessee are treated as partly allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 123/GTY/2020[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Guwahati20 Jul 2023AY 2016-17

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav, Vice-(Kz) & Shri Girish Agrawal

Section 133ASection 142(1)Section 147Section 148

147 shall be taken by the assessing officer in case of such trust or institution for any assessment year preceding the aforesaid assessment year only for non-registration of such trust or institution for the said assessment year:] 11. From the plain reading of the said proviso it transpire that the provisions of sec 11 and 12 shall apply

STATE HEALTH SOCIETY ASSAM,GUWAHATI vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER (EXEMPTION), WARD-2(3), GUWAHATI

In the result, the appeals of the assessee are treated as partly allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 124/GTY/2020[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Guwahati20 Jul 2023AY 2017-18

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav, Vice-(Kz) & Shri Girish Agrawal

Section 133ASection 142(1)Section 147Section 148

147 shall be taken by the assessing officer in case of such trust or institution for any assessment year preceding the aforesaid assessment year only for non-registration of such trust or institution for the said assessment year:] 11. From the plain reading of the said proviso it transpire that the provisions of sec 11 and 12 shall apply

STATE HEALTH SOCIETY ASSAM,GUWAHATI vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, (EXEMPTION), WARD-2(3), GUWAHATI

In the result, the appeals of the assessee are treated as partly allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 121/GTY/2020[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Guwahati20 Jul 2023AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav, Vice-(Kz) & Shri Girish Agrawal

Section 133ASection 142(1)Section 147Section 148

147 shall be taken by the assessing officer in case of such trust or institution for any assessment year preceding the aforesaid assessment year only for non-registration of such trust or institution for the said assessment year:] 11. From the plain reading of the said proviso it transpire that the provisions of sec 11 and 12 shall apply

STATE HEALTH SOCIETY ASSAM,GUWAHATI vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, (EXEMPTION) WARD-2(3), GUWAHATI

In the result, the appeals of the assessee are treated as partly allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 122/GTY/2020[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Guwahati20 Jul 2023AY 2015-16

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav, Vice-(Kz) & Shri Girish Agrawal

Section 133ASection 142(1)Section 147Section 148

147 shall be taken by the assessing officer in case of such trust or institution for any assessment year preceding the aforesaid assessment year only for non-registration of such trust or institution for the said assessment year:] 11. From the plain reading of the said proviso it transpire that the provisions of sec 11 and 12 shall apply

STATE HEALTH SOCIETY ASSAM,GUWAHATI vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, (EXEMPTION), WARD-2(3), GUWAHATI

In the result, the appeals of the assessee are treated as partly allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 119/GTY/2020[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Guwahati20 Jul 2023AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav, Vice-(Kz) & Shri Girish Agrawal

Section 133ASection 142(1)Section 147Section 148

147 shall be taken by the assessing officer in case of such trust or institution for any assessment year preceding the aforesaid assessment year only for non-registration of such trust or institution for the said assessment year:] 11. From the plain reading of the said proviso it transpire that the provisions of sec 11 and 12 shall apply

STATE HEALTH SOCIETY ASSAM,GUWAHATI vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER (EXEMPTION), WARD-2(3), GUWAHATI

In the result, the appeals of the assessee are treated as partly allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 120/GTY/2020[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Guwahati20 Jul 2023AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav, Vice-(Kz) & Shri Girish Agrawal

Section 133ASection 142(1)Section 147Section 148

147 shall be taken by the assessing officer in case of such trust or institution for any assessment year preceding the aforesaid assessment year only for non-registration of such trust or institution for the said assessment year:] 11. From the plain reading of the said proviso it transpire that the provisions of sec 11 and 12 shall apply

INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-1, SILCHAR vs. ROHIT KUMAR GULGULIA, SILCHAR

In the result, appeal of the revenue is dismissed

ITA 182/GTY/2020[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Guwahati16 Aug 2023AY 2011-12

Bench: Shri Sanjay Garg & Shri Girish Agrawalassessment Year: 2011-12

For Appellant: Shri Babu Lal Jain, FCAFor Respondent: Shri N. T. Sherpa, JCIT
Section 131Section 133ASection 143(3)Section 147Section 68

u/s 147 were not disposed of by the AO by any speaking order in writing as required under the law, without taking into consideration the decision of the Hon'ble courts cited by the AO in his reply dated 24.04.2019, according to which a time span of four weeks was to be given to the assessee after the objections

ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-2, GUWAHATI vs. FORTUNE VANIJYA PRIVATE LIMITED, GUWAHATI

In the result both the appeal of the Revenue and the cross objections of the assessee stands partly allowed

ITA 21/GTY/2021[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Guwahati10 Dec 2021AY 2011-12

Bench: Shri P.M. Jagtap, Hon’Ble V.P (Kz) & Shri A. T. Varkey, Jm]

Section 132Section 132(4)Section 142(1)Section 153ASection 153CSection 68

147 of the Act, however the ratio decidendi will apply in the present case, because, like Section 147/148 of the Act, the AO gets the authority to assess/reassess the income of a searched person or other person u/s 153A/153C for the extended assessment years (7th to 10th AYs) only if he has in his possession the jurisdictional fact

D.C.I.T., CIRCLE-1, DIBRUGARH vs. SHEETAL BAMALWA, DIBRUGARH

In the result, all the appeals of the Revenue are dismissed and that of the Cross Objections of the assessees are allowed

ITA 64/GTY/2023[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Guwahati01 Sept 2023AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav, Vice-(Kz) & Shri Rajesh Kumar

survey operation was also conducted in the business premises of the Group at 190A, Maniktala Main Road, Kolkata on 20.11.2017 under section 133A of the Act. It is pertinent to observe CO Nos. 6 to 21/GAU/2023 (in ITA Nos. 51 to 66/GAU/2023) that all these respondents belonged to Nemichand Bamalwa & Sons Group. M/s. Nemichand Bamalwa & Sons

DCIT, CIRCLE-1, DIBRUGARH vs. BAJRANG LAL BAMALWA, DIBRUGARH

In the result, all the appeals of the Revenue are dismissed and that of the Cross Objections of the assessees are allowed

ITA 52/GTY/2023[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Guwahati01 Sept 2023AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav, Vice-(Kz) & Shri Rajesh Kumar

survey operation was also conducted in the business premises of the Group at 190A, Maniktala Main Road, Kolkata on 20.11.2017 under section 133A of the Act. It is pertinent to observe CO Nos. 6 to 21/GAU/2023 (in ITA Nos. 51 to 66/GAU/2023) that all these respondents belonged to Nemichand Bamalwa & Sons Group. M/s. Nemichand Bamalwa & Sons

D.C.I.T., CIRCLE-1, DIBRUGARH vs. BACHH RAJ BAMALWA, DIBRUGARH

In the result, all the appeals of the Revenue are dismissed and that of the Cross Objections of the assessees are allowed

ITA 53/GTY/2023[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Guwahati01 Sept 2023AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav, Vice-(Kz) & Shri Rajesh Kumar

survey operation was also conducted in the business premises of the Group at 190A, Maniktala Main Road, Kolkata on 20.11.2017 under section 133A of the Act. It is pertinent to observe CO Nos. 6 to 21/GAU/2023 (in ITA Nos. 51 to 66/GAU/2023) that all these respondents belonged to Nemichand Bamalwa & Sons Group. M/s. Nemichand Bamalwa & Sons

D.C.I.T., CIRCLE-1, DIBRUGARH vs. BACHH RAJ BAMALWA, DIBRUGARH

In the result, all the appeals of the Revenue are dismissed and that of the Cross Objections of the assessees are allowed

ITA 54/GTY/2023[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Guwahati01 Sept 2023AY 2015-16

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav, Vice-(Kz) & Shri Rajesh Kumar

survey operation was also conducted in the business premises of the Group at 190A, Maniktala Main Road, Kolkata on 20.11.2017 under section 133A of the Act. It is pertinent to observe CO Nos. 6 to 21/GAU/2023 (in ITA Nos. 51 to 66/GAU/2023) that all these respondents belonged to Nemichand Bamalwa & Sons Group. M/s. Nemichand Bamalwa & Sons

D.C.I.T., CIRCLE- 1, DIBRUGARH vs. HANS RAJ BAMALWA, DIBRUGARH

In the result, all the appeals of the Revenue are dismissed and that of the Cross Objections of the assessees are allowed

ITA 55/GTY/2023[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Guwahati01 Sept 2023AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav, Vice-(Kz) & Shri Rajesh Kumar

survey operation was also conducted in the business premises of the Group at 190A, Maniktala Main Road, Kolkata on 20.11.2017 under section 133A of the Act. It is pertinent to observe CO Nos. 6 to 21/GAU/2023 (in ITA Nos. 51 to 66/GAU/2023) that all these respondents belonged to Nemichand Bamalwa & Sons Group. M/s. Nemichand Bamalwa & Sons

D.C.I.T., CIRCLE- 1, DIBRUGARH vs. HANS RAJ BAMALWA (HUF), DIBRUGARH

In the result, all the appeals of the Revenue are dismissed and that of the Cross Objections of the assessees are allowed

ITA 56/GTY/2023[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Guwahati01 Sept 2023AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav, Vice-(Kz) & Shri Rajesh Kumar

survey operation was also conducted in the business premises of the Group at 190A, Maniktala Main Road, Kolkata on 20.11.2017 under section 133A of the Act. It is pertinent to observe CO Nos. 6 to 21/GAU/2023 (in ITA Nos. 51 to 66/GAU/2023) that all these respondents belonged to Nemichand Bamalwa & Sons Group. M/s. Nemichand Bamalwa & Sons