SHREE PRAKSH SINGH,GURGAON vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-1, DIGBOI
In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed
ITA 14/GTY/2019[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Guwahati09 Oct 2020AY 2012-13
Bench: Shri A. T. Varkey, Jm &Dr. A.L.Saini, Am आयकरअपीलसं./Ita No.14/Gau/2019 ("नधा"रणवष" / Assessment Year:2012-13)
For Appellant: Shri S. P. Bhati, A.RFor Respondent: Shri Amitava Sen, JCIT, Sr. D.R
Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 147Section 148Section 50CSection 50C(1)
u/s 147 of the Act. During the reassessment proceedings the assessee submitted written submissions before the assessing officer to substantiate his claim, however, the assessing officer rejected the same and taking into account the valuation report of DVO had computed the long term capital gain of Rs.5,50,17,042/-.
6. Aggrieved by the order of the Assessing Officer
