BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

88 results for “reassessment u/s 147”+ Section 5clear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai4,004Delhi3,919Chennai1,040Kolkata934Bangalore928Ahmedabad783Jaipur553Hyderabad488Pune379Chandigarh297Surat281Raipur261Indore252Rajkot244Amritsar168Visakhapatnam140Patna120Cochin113Nagpur107Lucknow92Guwahati88Agra85Cuttack72Dehradun58Jodhpur57Allahabad45Karnataka44Telangana43Panaji22Jabalpur20Ranchi18Calcutta16Varanasi9Kerala7Orissa7SC6Gauhati3Rajasthan2Himachal Pradesh2Punjab & Haryana2Uttarakhand1

Key Topics

Section 148106Addition to Income67Section 153A64Section 6863Section 14758Section 143(3)52Section 25049Section 143(2)29Section 10(26)

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX -II, GUWAHATI vs. M/S. ARIHANT INTERNATIONAL LIMITED , GUWAHATI

In the result, the appeal filed by the Revenue is dismissed

ITA 275/GTY/2018[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Guwahati19 Oct 2022AY 2009-10

Bench: Dr. Manish Borad & Sri Sonjoy Sarma

Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 147Section 148Section 250Section 43(5)Section 73

5 of 23 I.T.A. No.: 275/Gau/2018 Assessment Year: 2009-10 M/s. Arihant International Limited. 7. We have heard rival contentions and perused the records placed before us. Revenue is in appeal before this Tribunal challenging the order of ld. CIT(A) quashing the assessment order framed u/s 147 of the Act holding that the same has been reopened based

Showing 1–20 of 88 · Page 1 of 5

25
Reassessment24
Reopening of Assessment17
Penalty13

ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-1, GUWAHATI vs. M/S. LINKSTAR PROMOTERS (P) LTD, KOLKATA

In the result, both the appeals of the Revenue are dismissed

ITA 9/GTY/2021[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Guwahati25 Sept 2023AY 2012-13

Bench: Dr. Manish Borad & Shri Sonjoy Sarma

Section 143(3)Section 68

5 M/s. Linkstar Promoters Pvt. Limited & M/s. Winner Dealtrade Pvt. limited under section 68 read with respect to section 115BBE of the Act towards unexplained share capital and share premium received in the year. Aggrieved, the assessee preferred appeal before the ld. CIT(Appeals). 8. The assessee apart from raising the grounds on merit challenging the additions made

ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-1, GUWAHATI vs. M/S. WINNER DEALTRADE (P) LTD.,, KOLKATA

In the result, both the appeals of the Revenue are dismissed

ITA 13/GTY/2021[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Guwahati25 Sept 2023AY 2012-13

Bench: Dr. Manish Borad & Shri Sonjoy Sarma

Section 143(3)Section 68

5 M/s. Linkstar Promoters Pvt. Limited & M/s. Winner Dealtrade Pvt. limited under section 68 read with respect to section 115BBE of the Act towards unexplained share capital and share premium received in the year. Aggrieved, the assessee preferred appeal before the ld. CIT(Appeals). 8. The assessee apart from raising the grounds on merit challenging the additions made

ABCI INFRASTRUCTURES PRIVATE LIMITED,KOLKATA vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1, GUWAHATI

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed, whereas the appeal of the Revenue is dismissed

ITA 40/GTY/2022[2013-14]Status: HeardITAT Guwahati03 Apr 2023AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav, Vice-(Kz) & Dr. Manish Borad

For Appellant: (1) That on the facts and in the circumstances of the case
Section 143(3)Section 147Section 148Section 153Section 153C

reassessment proceeding u/s. 147 by issue of a notice u/s. 148, in spite of the fact that none of conditions precedent existed and/or have been complied with and/or fulfilled by the Ld. A.O. (2) That the Ld. CIT(A) was wholly wrong in not considering the fact that proceeding initiated u/s 147 of the IT Act, 1961 is completely

ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1, GUWAHATI vs. ABCI INFRASTRUCTURES PRIVATE LIMITED, KOLKATA

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed, whereas the appeal of the Revenue is dismissed

ITA 1/GTY/2023[2013-14]Status: HeardITAT Guwahati03 Apr 2023AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav, Vice-(Kz) & Dr. Manish Borad

For Appellant: (1) That on the facts and in the circumstances of the case
Section 143(3)Section 147Section 148Section 153Section 153C

reassessment proceeding u/s. 147 by issue of a notice u/s. 148, in spite of the fact that none of conditions precedent existed and/or have been complied with and/or fulfilled by the Ld. A.O. (2) That the Ld. CIT(A) was wholly wrong in not considering the fact that proceeding initiated u/s 147 of the IT Act, 1961 is completely

AMPLEX PROJECTS PRIVATE LIMITED,AGARTALA vs. DCIT/ACIT, CIRCLE SILCHAR, SILCHAR

In the result, appeal of the assessee is allowed in above terms

ITA 333/GTY/2025[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Guwahati19 Jan 2026AY 2013-14

Bench: the Ld. CIT(A).

For Respondent: Shri Santosh Kumar Karnani, Addl. CIT
Section 1Section 139(1)Section 143(3)Section 153ASection 245DSection 245D(4)Section 250

147 section 148. section 149, section 131 and section 153, in the case of a person where a search initiated under section 132 or books of account other documents or any assets are requisitioned under section 132A after the 31st day of May, 2003, the Assessing Officer shall- a) issue notice to such person requiring him to furnish within such

MAYURPLY INDUSTRIES PVT LTD.,HOOGHLY, WEST BENGAL vs. ACIT, CIRCLE 3, GUWAHATI, ASSAM

In the result IT(SS)A Nos

ITA 224/GTY/2024[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Guwahati24 Mar 2025AY 2018-19

Bench: Shri Rajesh Kumar, Am & Shri Manomohan Das, Jm

For Appellant: Shri Siddharth Agarwal, ARFor Respondent: Shri Kaushik Roy, DR
Section 132Section 143(3)Section 153ASection 253Section 253(5)

147, Section 148, Section 149, Section 151 and Section 153, in the case of a person where a search is initiated under section 132 or books of account, other documents or any assets are requisitioned under section 132-A after the 31st day of May, 2003, the Assessing Officer shall— (a) issue notice to such person requiring him to furnish

D.C.I.T., CIRCLE-1, DIBRUGARH vs. SHEETAL BAMALWA, DIBRUGARH

In the result, all the appeals of the Revenue are dismissed and that of the Cross Objections of the assessees are allowed

ITA 64/GTY/2023[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Guwahati01 Sept 2023AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav, Vice-(Kz) & Shri Rajesh Kumar

5 HANS RAJ 2012-13 Twenty First Century 4,05,02,867 PB-5 BAMALWA India Ltd. 6 HANS RAJ 2012-13 Twenty First Century 3,94,72,552 PB-6 BAMALWA India Ltd. (H.U.F) 7 USHA BAMALWA 2012-13 Twenty First Century 4,04,76,152 PB-7 India Ltd. 8 MEENAKSHI 2012-13 Twenty First Century

D.C.I.T., CIRCLE-1, DIBRUGARH vs. VINAY BAMALWA, DIBRUGARH

In the result, all the appeals of the Revenue are dismissed and that of the Cross Objections of the assessees are allowed

ITA 61/GTY/2023[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Guwahati01 Sept 2023AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav, Vice-(Kz) & Shri Rajesh Kumar

5 HANS RAJ 2012-13 Twenty First Century 4,05,02,867 PB-5 BAMALWA India Ltd. 6 HANS RAJ 2012-13 Twenty First Century 3,94,72,552 PB-6 BAMALWA India Ltd. (H.U.F) 7 USHA BAMALWA 2012-13 Twenty First Century 4,04,76,152 PB-7 India Ltd. 8 MEENAKSHI 2012-13 Twenty First Century

D.C.I.T., CIRCLE-1, DIBRUGARH vs. PRAMOD KUMAR BAMALWA, DIBRUGARH

In the result, all the appeals of the Revenue are dismissed and that of the Cross Objections of the assessees are allowed

ITA 65/GTY/2023[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Guwahati01 Sept 2023AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav, Vice-(Kz) & Shri Rajesh Kumar

5 HANS RAJ 2012-13 Twenty First Century 4,05,02,867 PB-5 BAMALWA India Ltd. 6 HANS RAJ 2012-13 Twenty First Century 3,94,72,552 PB-6 BAMALWA India Ltd. (H.U.F) 7 USHA BAMALWA 2012-13 Twenty First Century 4,04,76,152 PB-7 India Ltd. 8 MEENAKSHI 2012-13 Twenty First Century

D.C.I.T., CIRCLE- 1, DIBRUGARH vs. USHA BAMALWA, DIBRUGARH

In the result, all the appeals of the Revenue are dismissed and that of the Cross Objections of the assessees are allowed

ITA 57/GTY/2023[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Guwahati01 Sept 2023AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav, Vice-(Kz) & Shri Rajesh Kumar

5 HANS RAJ 2012-13 Twenty First Century 4,05,02,867 PB-5 BAMALWA India Ltd. 6 HANS RAJ 2012-13 Twenty First Century 3,94,72,552 PB-6 BAMALWA India Ltd. (H.U.F) 7 USHA BAMALWA 2012-13 Twenty First Century 4,04,76,152 PB-7 India Ltd. 8 MEENAKSHI 2012-13 Twenty First Century

D.C.I.T., CIRCLE- 1, DIBRUGARH vs. MEENAKSHI BAMALWA SONI, DIBRUGARH

In the result, all the appeals of the Revenue are dismissed and that of the Cross Objections of the assessees are allowed

ITA 58/GTY/2023[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Guwahati01 Sept 2023AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav, Vice-(Kz) & Shri Rajesh Kumar

5 HANS RAJ 2012-13 Twenty First Century 4,05,02,867 PB-5 BAMALWA India Ltd. 6 HANS RAJ 2012-13 Twenty First Century 3,94,72,552 PB-6 BAMALWA India Ltd. (H.U.F) 7 USHA BAMALWA 2012-13 Twenty First Century 4,04,76,152 PB-7 India Ltd. 8 MEENAKSHI 2012-13 Twenty First Century

DCIT, CIRCLE-1, DIBRUGARH vs. BAJRANG LAL BAMALWA, DIBRUGARH

In the result, all the appeals of the Revenue are dismissed and that of the Cross Objections of the assessees are allowed

ITA 51/GTY/2023[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Guwahati01 Sept 2023AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav, Vice-(Kz) & Shri Rajesh Kumar

5 HANS RAJ 2012-13 Twenty First Century 4,05,02,867 PB-5 BAMALWA India Ltd. 6 HANS RAJ 2012-13 Twenty First Century 3,94,72,552 PB-6 BAMALWA India Ltd. (H.U.F) 7 USHA BAMALWA 2012-13 Twenty First Century 4,04,76,152 PB-7 India Ltd. 8 MEENAKSHI 2012-13 Twenty First Century

DCIT, CIRCLE-1, DIBRUGARH vs. BAJRANG LAL BAMALWA, DIBRUGARH

In the result, all the appeals of the Revenue are dismissed and that of the Cross Objections of the assessees are allowed

ITA 52/GTY/2023[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Guwahati01 Sept 2023AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav, Vice-(Kz) & Shri Rajesh Kumar

5 HANS RAJ 2012-13 Twenty First Century 4,05,02,867 PB-5 BAMALWA India Ltd. 6 HANS RAJ 2012-13 Twenty First Century 3,94,72,552 PB-6 BAMALWA India Ltd. (H.U.F) 7 USHA BAMALWA 2012-13 Twenty First Century 4,04,76,152 PB-7 India Ltd. 8 MEENAKSHI 2012-13 Twenty First Century

D.C.I.T., CIRCLE- 1, DIBRUGARH vs. HANS RAJ BAMALWA, DIBRUGARH

In the result, all the appeals of the Revenue are dismissed and that of the Cross Objections of the assessees are allowed

ITA 55/GTY/2023[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Guwahati01 Sept 2023AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav, Vice-(Kz) & Shri Rajesh Kumar

5 HANS RAJ 2012-13 Twenty First Century 4,05,02,867 PB-5 BAMALWA India Ltd. 6 HANS RAJ 2012-13 Twenty First Century 3,94,72,552 PB-6 BAMALWA India Ltd. (H.U.F) 7 USHA BAMALWA 2012-13 Twenty First Century 4,04,76,152 PB-7 India Ltd. 8 MEENAKSHI 2012-13 Twenty First Century

D.C.I.T., CIRCLE-1, DIBRUGARH vs. RAVI BAMALWA, DIBRUGARH

In the result, all the appeals of the Revenue are dismissed and that of the Cross Objections of the assessees are allowed

ITA 62/GTY/2023[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Guwahati01 Sept 2023AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav, Vice-(Kz) & Shri Rajesh Kumar

5 HANS RAJ 2012-13 Twenty First Century 4,05,02,867 PB-5 BAMALWA India Ltd. 6 HANS RAJ 2012-13 Twenty First Century 3,94,72,552 PB-6 BAMALWA India Ltd. (H.U.F) 7 USHA BAMALWA 2012-13 Twenty First Century 4,04,76,152 PB-7 India Ltd. 8 MEENAKSHI 2012-13 Twenty First Century

D.C.I.T., CIRCLE-1, DIBRUGARH vs. BACHH RAJ BAMALWA, DIBRUGARH

In the result, all the appeals of the Revenue are dismissed and that of the Cross Objections of the assessees are allowed

ITA 54/GTY/2023[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Guwahati01 Sept 2023AY 2015-16

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav, Vice-(Kz) & Shri Rajesh Kumar

5 HANS RAJ 2012-13 Twenty First Century 4,05,02,867 PB-5 BAMALWA India Ltd. 6 HANS RAJ 2012-13 Twenty First Century 3,94,72,552 PB-6 BAMALWA India Ltd. (H.U.F) 7 USHA BAMALWA 2012-13 Twenty First Century 4,04,76,152 PB-7 India Ltd. 8 MEENAKSHI 2012-13 Twenty First Century

D.C.I.T., CIRCLE- 1, DIBRUGARH vs. HANS RAJ BAMALWA (HUF), DIBRUGARH

In the result, all the appeals of the Revenue are dismissed and that of the Cross Objections of the assessees are allowed

ITA 56/GTY/2023[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Guwahati01 Sept 2023AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav, Vice-(Kz) & Shri Rajesh Kumar

5 HANS RAJ 2012-13 Twenty First Century 4,05,02,867 PB-5 BAMALWA India Ltd. 6 HANS RAJ 2012-13 Twenty First Century 3,94,72,552 PB-6 BAMALWA India Ltd. (H.U.F) 7 USHA BAMALWA 2012-13 Twenty First Century 4,04,76,152 PB-7 India Ltd. 8 MEENAKSHI 2012-13 Twenty First Century

D.C.I.T., CIRCLE-1, DIBRUGARH vs. BACHH RAJ BAMALWA, DIBRUGARH

In the result, all the appeals of the Revenue are dismissed and that of the Cross Objections of the assessees are allowed

ITA 53/GTY/2023[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Guwahati01 Sept 2023AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav, Vice-(Kz) & Shri Rajesh Kumar

5 HANS RAJ 2012-13 Twenty First Century 4,05,02,867 PB-5 BAMALWA India Ltd. 6 HANS RAJ 2012-13 Twenty First Century 3,94,72,552 PB-6 BAMALWA India Ltd. (H.U.F) 7 USHA BAMALWA 2012-13 Twenty First Century 4,04,76,152 PB-7 India Ltd. 8 MEENAKSHI 2012-13 Twenty First Century

D.C.I.T., CIRCLE-1, DIBRUGARH vs. MADAN LAL BAMALWA, DIBRUGARH

In the result, all the appeals of the Revenue are dismissed and that of the Cross Objections of the assessees are allowed

ITA 63/GTY/2023[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Guwahati01 Sept 2023AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav, Vice-(Kz) & Shri Rajesh Kumar

5 HANS RAJ 2012-13 Twenty First Century 4,05,02,867 PB-5 BAMALWA India Ltd. 6 HANS RAJ 2012-13 Twenty First Century 3,94,72,552 PB-6 BAMALWA India Ltd. (H.U.F) 7 USHA BAMALWA 2012-13 Twenty First Century 4,04,76,152 PB-7 India Ltd. 8 MEENAKSHI 2012-13 Twenty First Century