SHRI SUBRATA KUMAR SAHA,AGARTALA vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-AGARTALA, AGARTALA

Appeals are allowed in above terms

Bench: Shri S.S.Godara & Dr. A.L. Saini

260 to 266/Gau/2017 decided on 22.02.2018 quashing identical proceedings in absence of a valid satisfaction as under:- “2. As the facts and issue involved in these appeals are identical, they are being disposed off together by this consolidated order. 3. The grounds raised in the appeal of the assessee for assessment year 2009-2010 are as under:- ‘1. For that

SHRI SUBRATA KUMAR SAHA,AGARTALA vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-AGARTALA, AGARTALA

Appeals are allowed in above terms

Bench: Shri S.S.Godara & Dr. A.L. Saini

260 to 266/Gau/2017 decided on 22.02.2018 quashing identical proceedings in absence of a valid satisfaction as under:- “2. As the facts and issue involved in these appeals are identical, they are being disposed off together by this consolidated order. 3. The grounds raised in the appeal of the assessee for assessment year 2009-2010 are as under:- ‘1. For that

SHRI SUBRATA KUMAR SAHA,AGARTALA vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-AGARTALA, AGARTALA

Appeals are allowed in above terms

Bench: Shri S.S.Godara & Dr. A.L. Saini

260 to 266/Gau/2017 decided on 22.02.2018 quashing identical proceedings in absence of a valid satisfaction as under:- “2. As the facts and issue involved in these appeals are identical, they are being disposed off together by this consolidated order. 3. The grounds raised in the appeal of the assessee for assessment year 2009-2010 are as under:- ‘1. For that

SHRI SUBRATA KUMAR SAHA,AGARTALA vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-AGARTALA, AGARTALA

Appeals are allowed in above terms

Bench: Shri S.S.Godara & Dr. A.L. Saini

260 to 266/Gau/2017 decided on 22.02.2018 quashing identical proceedings in absence of a valid satisfaction as under:- “2. As the facts and issue involved in these appeals are identical, they are being disposed off together by this consolidated order. 3. The grounds raised in the appeal of the assessee for assessment year 2009-2010 are as under:- ‘1. For that

SHRI SUBRATA KUMAR SAHA,AGARTALA vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-AGARTALA, AGARTALA

Appeals are allowed in above terms

Bench: Shri S.S.Godara & Dr. A.L. Saini

260 to 266/Gau/2017 decided on 22.02.2018 quashing identical proceedings in absence of a valid satisfaction as under:- “2. As the facts and issue involved in these appeals are identical, they are being disposed off together by this consolidated order. 3. The grounds raised in the appeal of the assessee for assessment year 2009-2010 are as under:- ‘1. For that

DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE - AGARTALA , AGARTALA vs. SHRI SUBHAJIT PAUL, AGARTALA

In the result, cross-objection nos

Bench: Shri A. T. Varkey, Jm &Dr. A.L.Saini, Am आयकरअपीलसं./Ita No.116/Gau/2018 ("नधा"रणवष" / Assessment Year:2014-15)

260 ….do…. 11 ….do... …do…. 11- 1,16,61,819 ….do…. 12 ….do... …do…. 12- 2,32,87,431 ….do…. 13 ….do... …do…. 13- 1,85,27,754 ….do…. 14 ….do... …do…. 14- 2,80.46.245 ….do…. 15 Naamita Paul AGZPP8327N

JANARDAN MISHRA,GUWAHATI vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-1(3), GUWAHATI

Bench: Shri S.S.Godara & Dr. A.L.Saini

u/s. 254 of the said Act, as mentioned in section 153(3)(ii) thereof, the appellant seeks to refer to the pronouncement of the Hon'ble Supreme Court in Rajinder Nath vs. Commissioner of Income Tax (1979) 120 ITR in this respect, more particularly the following paragraph from the judgment at pages 18-19 of the Reports: ‘The expression “finding

JANARDAN MISRA,GUWAHATI vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-1(3), GUWAHATI

Bench: Shri S.S.Godara & Dr. A.L.Saini

u/s. 254 of the said Act, as mentioned in section 153(3)(ii) thereof, the appellant seeks to refer to the pronouncement of the Hon'ble Supreme Court in Rajinder Nath vs. Commissioner of Income Tax (1979) 120 ITR in this respect, more particularly the following paragraph from the judgment at pages 18-19 of the Reports: ‘The expression “finding