BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

58 results for “reassessment u/s 147”+ Section 23clear

Sorted by relevance

Delhi1,947Mumbai1,841Bangalore600Chennai576Jaipur391Kolkata371Ahmedabad354Hyderabad341Chandigarh184Pune162Raipur132Rajkot127Surat125Indore121Amritsar96Lucknow60Guwahati58Visakhapatnam55Patna51Cuttack48Agra41Jodhpur41Nagpur41Allahabad37Cochin36Telangana34Karnataka25Dehradun21Jabalpur9SC5Kerala5Panaji4Orissa4Varanasi4Ranchi2Gauhati2Rajasthan1Uttarakhand1

Key Topics

Section 14866Section 6851Section 153A51Section 143(3)39Addition to Income38Section 25037Section 153D25Section 14719Section 132

ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-1, GUWAHATI vs. M/S. WINNER DEALTRADE (P) LTD.,, KOLKATA

In the result, both the appeals of the Revenue are dismissed

ITA 13/GTY/2021[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Guwahati25 Sept 2023AY 2012-13

Bench: Dr. Manish Borad & Shri Sonjoy Sarma

Section 143(3)Section 68

u/s. 68 of the Act to explain the alleged cash credits to the satisfaction of the ld. Assessing Officer and there being no further inquiry conducted by the ld. Assessing Officer means that the ld. Assessing Officer was satisfied with the explanation offered by the assessee. Therefore, ld. Assessing Officer did not make any addition under section

ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-1, GUWAHATI vs. M/S. LINKSTAR PROMOTERS (P) LTD, KOLKATA

In the result, both the appeals of the Revenue are dismissed

ITA 9/GTY/2021[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Guwahati

Showing 1–20 of 58 · Page 1 of 3

14
Reassessment12
Penalty9
Disallowance9
25 Sept 2023
AY 2012-13

Bench: Dr. Manish Borad & Shri Sonjoy Sarma

Section 143(3)Section 68

u/s. 68 of the Act to explain the alleged cash credits to the satisfaction of the ld. Assessing Officer and there being no further inquiry conducted by the ld. Assessing Officer means that the ld. Assessing Officer was satisfied with the explanation offered by the assessee. Therefore, ld. Assessing Officer did not make any addition under section

ABCI INFRASTRUCTURES PRIVATE LIMITED,KOLKATA vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1, GUWAHATI

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed, whereas the appeal of the Revenue is dismissed

ITA 40/GTY/2022[2013-14]Status: HeardITAT Guwahati03 Apr 2023AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav, Vice-(Kz) & Dr. Manish Borad

For Appellant: (1) That on the facts and in the circumstances of the case
Section 143(3)Section 147Section 148Section 153Section 153C

reassessment proceeding u/s. 147 by issue of a notice u/s. 148, in spite of the fact that none of conditions precedent existed and/or have been complied with and/or fulfilled by the Ld. A.O. (2) That the Ld. CIT(A) was wholly wrong in not considering the fact that proceeding initiated u/s 147 of the IT Act, 1961 is completely

ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1, GUWAHATI vs. ABCI INFRASTRUCTURES PRIVATE LIMITED, KOLKATA

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed, whereas the appeal of the Revenue is dismissed

ITA 1/GTY/2023[2013-14]Status: HeardITAT Guwahati03 Apr 2023AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav, Vice-(Kz) & Dr. Manish Borad

For Appellant: (1) That on the facts and in the circumstances of the case
Section 143(3)Section 147Section 148Section 153Section 153C

reassessment proceeding u/s. 147 by issue of a notice u/s. 148, in spite of the fact that none of conditions precedent existed and/or have been complied with and/or fulfilled by the Ld. A.O. (2) That the Ld. CIT(A) was wholly wrong in not considering the fact that proceeding initiated u/s 147 of the IT Act, 1961 is completely

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX -II, GUWAHATI vs. M/S. ARIHANT INTERNATIONAL LIMITED , GUWAHATI

In the result, the appeal filed by the Revenue is dismissed

ITA 275/GTY/2018[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Guwahati19 Oct 2022AY 2009-10

Bench: Dr. Manish Borad & Sri Sonjoy Sarma

Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 147Section 148Section 250Section 43(5)Section 73

23 I.T.A. No.: 275/Gau/2018 Assessment Year: 2009-10 M/s. Arihant International Limited. bringing any tangible material on record to show that income had escaped assessment. 9.1. Reference in this regard is made to the first proviso to Section 147 of the Act which states that where an assessee has filed a return and thereafter the assessment is completed either u/s

D.C.I.T., CIRCLE-1, DIBRUGARH vs. VINAY BAMALWA, DIBRUGARH

In the result, all the appeals of the Revenue are dismissed and that of the Cross Objections of the assessees are allowed

ITA 61/GTY/2023[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Guwahati01 Sept 2023AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav, Vice-(Kz) & Shri Rajesh Kumar

23. In his next fold of submission, he pointed out that ld. Assessing Officer has made reference to the statement of Shri Pramod Kumar Bamalwa recorded under section 132(4) of the Income Tax Act. The questions and tabulated details confronted to Shri Pramod Kumar Bamalwa has been reproduced by the ld. 1st Appellate Authority on page

D.C.I.T., CIRCLE-1, DIBRUGARH vs. BACHH RAJ BAMALWA, DIBRUGARH

In the result, all the appeals of the Revenue are dismissed and that of the Cross Objections of the assessees are allowed

ITA 53/GTY/2023[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Guwahati01 Sept 2023AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav, Vice-(Kz) & Shri Rajesh Kumar

23. In his next fold of submission, he pointed out that ld. Assessing Officer has made reference to the statement of Shri Pramod Kumar Bamalwa recorded under section 132(4) of the Income Tax Act. The questions and tabulated details confronted to Shri Pramod Kumar Bamalwa has been reproduced by the ld. 1st Appellate Authority on page

D.C.I.T., CIRCLE- 1, DIBRUGARH vs. VISHAL BAMALWA , DIBRUGARH

In the result, all the appeals of the Revenue are dismissed and that of the Cross Objections of the assessees are allowed

ITA 60/GTY/2023[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Guwahati01 Sept 2023AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav, Vice-(Kz) & Shri Rajesh Kumar

23. In his next fold of submission, he pointed out that ld. Assessing Officer has made reference to the statement of Shri Pramod Kumar Bamalwa recorded under section 132(4) of the Income Tax Act. The questions and tabulated details confronted to Shri Pramod Kumar Bamalwa has been reproduced by the ld. 1st Appellate Authority on page

DCIT, CIRCLE-1, DIBRUGARH vs. BAJRANG LAL BAMALWA, DIBRUGARH

In the result, all the appeals of the Revenue are dismissed and that of the Cross Objections of the assessees are allowed

ITA 52/GTY/2023[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Guwahati01 Sept 2023AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav, Vice-(Kz) & Shri Rajesh Kumar

23. In his next fold of submission, he pointed out that ld. Assessing Officer has made reference to the statement of Shri Pramod Kumar Bamalwa recorded under section 132(4) of the Income Tax Act. The questions and tabulated details confronted to Shri Pramod Kumar Bamalwa has been reproduced by the ld. 1st Appellate Authority on page

D.C.I.T., CIRCLE-1, DIBRUGARH vs. RAVI BAMALWA, DIBRUGARH

In the result, all the appeals of the Revenue are dismissed and that of the Cross Objections of the assessees are allowed

ITA 62/GTY/2023[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Guwahati01 Sept 2023AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav, Vice-(Kz) & Shri Rajesh Kumar

23. In his next fold of submission, he pointed out that ld. Assessing Officer has made reference to the statement of Shri Pramod Kumar Bamalwa recorded under section 132(4) of the Income Tax Act. The questions and tabulated details confronted to Shri Pramod Kumar Bamalwa has been reproduced by the ld. 1st Appellate Authority on page

D.C.I.T., CIRCLE-1, DIBRUGARH vs. PRAMOD KUMAR BAMALWA, DIBRUGARH

In the result, all the appeals of the Revenue are dismissed and that of the Cross Objections of the assessees are allowed

ITA 65/GTY/2023[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Guwahati01 Sept 2023AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav, Vice-(Kz) & Shri Rajesh Kumar

23. In his next fold of submission, he pointed out that ld. Assessing Officer has made reference to the statement of Shri Pramod Kumar Bamalwa recorded under section 132(4) of the Income Tax Act. The questions and tabulated details confronted to Shri Pramod Kumar Bamalwa has been reproduced by the ld. 1st Appellate Authority on page

D.C.I.T., CIRCLE-1, DIBRUGARH vs. BACHH RAJ BAMALWA, DIBRUGARH

In the result, all the appeals of the Revenue are dismissed and that of the Cross Objections of the assessees are allowed

ITA 54/GTY/2023[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Guwahati01 Sept 2023AY 2015-16

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav, Vice-(Kz) & Shri Rajesh Kumar

23. In his next fold of submission, he pointed out that ld. Assessing Officer has made reference to the statement of Shri Pramod Kumar Bamalwa recorded under section 132(4) of the Income Tax Act. The questions and tabulated details confronted to Shri Pramod Kumar Bamalwa has been reproduced by the ld. 1st Appellate Authority on page

D.C.I.T., CIRCLE- 1, DIBRUGARH vs. HANS RAJ BAMALWA, DIBRUGARH

In the result, all the appeals of the Revenue are dismissed and that of the Cross Objections of the assessees are allowed

ITA 55/GTY/2023[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Guwahati01 Sept 2023AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav, Vice-(Kz) & Shri Rajesh Kumar

23. In his next fold of submission, he pointed out that ld. Assessing Officer has made reference to the statement of Shri Pramod Kumar Bamalwa recorded under section 132(4) of the Income Tax Act. The questions and tabulated details confronted to Shri Pramod Kumar Bamalwa has been reproduced by the ld. 1st Appellate Authority on page

D.C.I.T., CIRCLE- 1, DIBRUGARH vs. HANS RAJ BAMALWA (HUF), DIBRUGARH

In the result, all the appeals of the Revenue are dismissed and that of the Cross Objections of the assessees are allowed

ITA 56/GTY/2023[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Guwahati01 Sept 2023AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav, Vice-(Kz) & Shri Rajesh Kumar

23. In his next fold of submission, he pointed out that ld. Assessing Officer has made reference to the statement of Shri Pramod Kumar Bamalwa recorded under section 132(4) of the Income Tax Act. The questions and tabulated details confronted to Shri Pramod Kumar Bamalwa has been reproduced by the ld. 1st Appellate Authority on page

D.C.I.T., CIRCLE-1, DIBRUGARH vs. MADAN LAL BAMALWA, DIBRUGARH

In the result, all the appeals of the Revenue are dismissed and that of the Cross Objections of the assessees are allowed

ITA 63/GTY/2023[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Guwahati01 Sept 2023AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav, Vice-(Kz) & Shri Rajesh Kumar

23. In his next fold of submission, he pointed out that ld. Assessing Officer has made reference to the statement of Shri Pramod Kumar Bamalwa recorded under section 132(4) of the Income Tax Act. The questions and tabulated details confronted to Shri Pramod Kumar Bamalwa has been reproduced by the ld. 1st Appellate Authority on page

D.C.I.T., CIRCLE- 1, DIBRUGARH vs. MEENAKSHI BAMALWA SONI, DIBRUGARH

In the result, all the appeals of the Revenue are dismissed and that of the Cross Objections of the assessees are allowed

ITA 58/GTY/2023[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Guwahati01 Sept 2023AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav, Vice-(Kz) & Shri Rajesh Kumar

23. In his next fold of submission, he pointed out that ld. Assessing Officer has made reference to the statement of Shri Pramod Kumar Bamalwa recorded under section 132(4) of the Income Tax Act. The questions and tabulated details confronted to Shri Pramod Kumar Bamalwa has been reproduced by the ld. 1st Appellate Authority on page

D.C.I.T., CIRCLE- 1, DIBRUGARH vs. USHA BAMALWA, DIBRUGARH

In the result, all the appeals of the Revenue are dismissed and that of the Cross Objections of the assessees are allowed

ITA 57/GTY/2023[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Guwahati01 Sept 2023AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav, Vice-(Kz) & Shri Rajesh Kumar

23. In his next fold of submission, he pointed out that ld. Assessing Officer has made reference to the statement of Shri Pramod Kumar Bamalwa recorded under section 132(4) of the Income Tax Act. The questions and tabulated details confronted to Shri Pramod Kumar Bamalwa has been reproduced by the ld. 1st Appellate Authority on page

D.C.I.T., CIRCLE-1, DIBRUGARH vs. SHEETAL BAMALWA, DIBRUGARH

In the result, all the appeals of the Revenue are dismissed and that of the Cross Objections of the assessees are allowed

ITA 64/GTY/2023[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Guwahati01 Sept 2023AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav, Vice-(Kz) & Shri Rajesh Kumar

23. In his next fold of submission, he pointed out that ld. Assessing Officer has made reference to the statement of Shri Pramod Kumar Bamalwa recorded under section 132(4) of the Income Tax Act. The questions and tabulated details confronted to Shri Pramod Kumar Bamalwa has been reproduced by the ld. 1st Appellate Authority on page

DCIT, CIRCLE-1, DIBRUGARH vs. BAJRANG LAL BAMALWA, DIBRUGARH

In the result, all the appeals of the Revenue are dismissed and that of the Cross Objections of the assessees are allowed

ITA 51/GTY/2023[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Guwahati01 Sept 2023AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav, Vice-(Kz) & Shri Rajesh Kumar

23. In his next fold of submission, he pointed out that ld. Assessing Officer has made reference to the statement of Shri Pramod Kumar Bamalwa recorded under section 132(4) of the Income Tax Act. The questions and tabulated details confronted to Shri Pramod Kumar Bamalwa has been reproduced by the ld. 1st Appellate Authority on page

D.C.I.T., CIRCLE-1, DIBRUGARH vs. VINOD BAMALWA, DIBRUGARH

In the result, all the appeals of the Revenue are dismissed and that of the Cross Objections of the assessees are allowed

ITA 66/GTY/2023[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Guwahati01 Sept 2023AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav, Vice-(Kz) & Shri Rajesh Kumar

23. In his next fold of submission, he pointed out that ld. Assessing Officer has made reference to the statement of Shri Pramod Kumar Bamalwa recorded under section 132(4) of the Income Tax Act. The questions and tabulated details confronted to Shri Pramod Kumar Bamalwa has been reproduced by the ld. 1st Appellate Authority on page