SHREE PRAKSH SINGH,GURGAON vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-1, DIGBOI
In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed
ITA 14/GTY/2019[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Guwahati09 Oct 2020AY 2012-13
Bench: Shri A. T. Varkey, Jm &Dr. A.L.Saini, Am आयकरअपीलसं./Ita No.14/Gau/2019 ("नधा"रणवष" / Assessment Year:2012-13)
For Appellant: Shri S. P. Bhati, A.RFor Respondent: Shri Amitava Sen, JCIT, Sr. D.R
Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 147Section 148Section 50CSection 50C(1)
20,00,000, for both properties respectively). As per the information received, the property was ancestral. Therefore, the cost of acquisition is bound to be much lower than the valuation made for stamp duty purposes at the present date and it is obvious that the assessee by not declaring any income under the head “Capital Gain” in the return
